Smokers’ Rights at Work UK: What Employers Must Know

Discussions around “smokers’ rights at work” are often framed as though smoking carries legal protections similar to other personal characteristics. In reality, UK employment law takes a very different approach. Smoking is heavily regulated, not protected, and employers are placed under clear statutory duties to prevent exposure to tobacco smoke in most work-related settings.

For employers, the real risk does not come from restricting smoking. It comes from misunderstanding where legal obligations end and discretionary management decisions begin. Poorly drafted policies, inconsistent enforcement, or informal concessions can quickly escalate into grievances, allegations of unfair treatment, working time disputes, or enforcement action by local authorities. For broader context on employer decision-making in this area, see HR law.

What this article is about

This guide examines the legal position on smoking at work from an employer’s perspective. It explains whether employees have any legal right to smoke, how smoking interacts with equality law, what employers must do to comply with smoke-free legislation, and how to manage smoking-related issues without creating unnecessary legal or operational risk.

Section A: Do employees have a legal right to smoke at work?

The starting point for employers is simple but often misunderstood: there is no general legal right to smoke at work in the UK. Smoking is not protected by employment law, and employers are not required to accommodate it beyond ensuring statutory rest breaks are provided in accordance with working time rules.

1. Is smoking a protected right under UK employment law?

Smoking is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010. Unlike age, disability, religion, or sex, smoking does not attract statutory protection. This means employers are free, in principle, to restrict or prohibit smoking without breaching discrimination law, provided their approach is applied consistently and reasonably.

Nicotine addiction is also not recognised as a disability for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. Tribunals have repeatedly rejected arguments that smoking addiction constitutes a physical or mental impairment with a substantial and long-term adverse effect on day-to-day activities. As a result, employers are not under a duty to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate smoking. For related guidance, see disability discrimination.

This distinction is critical. Many workplace disputes arise because smoking is treated informally as a “need” rather than what it legally is: a personal habit that employers may regulate.

2. What does the law actually require employers to do?

Rather than protecting smoking, UK law actively restricts it. Smoke-free legislation imposes positive duties on employers to prevent smoking in enclosed and substantially enclosed workplaces, shared work vehicles, and other regulated spaces.

In practice, this means employers must:

• Prohibit smoking in smoke-free premises and vehicles
• Display compliant no-smoking signage
• Take reasonable steps to stop employees, contractors, or visitors from smoking in prohibited areas

Failure to do so can result in enforcement action and financial penalties against the business or the person in control of the premises.

3. Can employees argue unfair treatment if smoking is restricted?

Employees may perceive restrictions on smoking as unfair, particularly if they previously smoked during working hours or used informal arrangements that were tolerated in the past. However, perceived unfairness does not equate to legal entitlement.

The legal risk for employers does not lie in imposing restrictions, but in how those restrictions are implemented. Problems typically arise where:

• Smoking rules are applied inconsistently
• Certain employees are given informal exemptions
• Managers “turn a blind eye” in practice but rely on policies in disputes
• Smoking breaks are handled differently across teams

From a risk management perspective, clarity and consistency are far more important than generosity.

4. Employer decision-making at this stage

At this point, employers must be clear on three things:

• What the law requires: prevent smoking in smoke-free areas
• What employers must decide:</strong how far to go beyond the statutory minimum
• What happens if they get it wrong:</strong grievances, allegations of inconsistent treatment, and enforcement risk

Understanding that smoking is not a protected right gives employers the confidence to set clear rules, provided those rules are lawful, proportionate, and properly communicated.

Section A summary

Employees do not have a legal right to smoke at work, and smoking is not protected under UK equality law. Employers are required to prevent smoking in regulated areas and are entitled to control smoking during working hours through policy and management instruction. Legal risk arises not from restricting smoking, but from unclear, inconsistent, or poorly enforced rules.

Section B: Are employers required to allow smoke breaks?

Questions about smoke breaks are where employers most commonly expose themselves to avoidable legal risk. The issue is rarely whether smoking should be allowed, but how smoking is accommodated in practice and whether informal arrangements quietly undermine compliance with working time law.

1. Is there a legal right to smoke breaks at work?

There is no legal right to smoke breaks under UK employment law. Employees who smoke are entitled to the same statutory rest breaks as non-smokers and nothing more. Smoking does not create an entitlement to additional time away from work.

The relevant law is the working time rules. Under these regulations, most adult workers are entitled to:

• One uninterrupted rest break of at least 20 minutes
• Where the working day exceeds six hours

The regulations do not refer to smoking and make no distinction between smokers and non-smokers. How an employee chooses to use their rest break, including whether they smoke during it, is a matter for the employee, provided smoking takes place lawfully.

2. Can employers refuse to allow smoking during working hours?

Yes. Employers are entitled to require that smoking only takes place during authorised rest breaks and only in permitted locations. There is no obligation to allow smoking during paid working time.

From a compliance and productivity perspective, many employers choose to prohibit smoking during working hours altogether, except during statutory or contractual breaks. This is lawful, provided the rule is clear and applied consistently.

Problems tend to arise where managers make informal concessions, such as allowing employees to “pop out for a cigarette” outside scheduled breaks. Over time, these informal practices can become entrenched and difficult to withdraw without dispute.

3. Can rest breaks be split up to allow smoking?

This is a common grey area and a frequent source of quiet non-compliance.

Under the Working Time Regulations, the 20-minute rest break must be uninterrupted. Allowing employees to split that break into multiple shorter breaks, such as two 10-minute breaks or several five-minute breaks to smoke, does not technically comply with the regulations.

In practice, many employers tolerate this arrangement without challenge. However, doing so creates risk rather than flexibility. If a dispute arises, an employee could argue that they were never given a compliant rest break, even if they took multiple short pauses during the day. For practical employer guidance on entitlements, see break entitlement.

It is important to be clear on the nature of the risk. Breaches of the Working Time Regulations in this context are not enforced through automatic fines. Instead, the exposure is to employment tribunal claims, particularly where an employee alleges:

• Failure to provide statutory rest breaks
• Unfair or inconsistent treatment compared with colleagues
• Detriment for asserting working time rights

4. Should smokers and non-smokers be treated differently?

From a legal and employee relations perspective, differential treatment is where employers get into difficulty. Allowing smokers more frequent breaks than non-smokers can generate resentment and lead to complaints of unfairness, even if those complaints do not ultimately succeed as legal claims.

The safer approach is to frame all breaks in neutral terms:

• Breaks are defined by law or contract
• Smoking is a personal choice
• Any permitted smoking must fit within existing break entitlements

This avoids framing smoking as something the employer is obliged to facilitate.

5. Employer decision-making at this stage

Employers should make deliberate decisions on the following points:

• What the law requires: provision of uninterrupted rest breaks under the Working Time Regulations
• What the employer must decide: whether smoking is permitted only during breaks, and whether breaks can be used flexibly
• What happens if this is mishandled: working time claims, inconsistent treatment disputes, and managerial drift

Clear policy wording, supported by consistent line management practice, is far safer than informal tolerance.

Section B summary

Employees do not have a legal right to smoke breaks. Employers are only required to provide statutory or contractual rest breaks, which must be uninterrupted. Allowing additional or fragmented breaks for smokers is a matter of discretion, not obligation, and can create compliance and fairness risks if not carefully controlled.

Section C: Can employers ban smoking completely?

One of the most common questions employers ask is not whether they must restrict smoking, but how far they are legally entitled to go. In particular, many employers want to know whether they can impose a total ban on smoking, including outside areas and during working hours, without exposing themselves to legal challenge.

1. Can an employer impose a complete smoking ban?

Yes. UK employers are legally entitled to impose a complete ban on smoking across their premises, including outdoor areas, provided the ban is lawful, reasonable, and clearly communicated.

Smoke-free legislation sets a minimum standard by prohibiting smoking in enclosed and substantially enclosed workplaces and shared vehicles. It does not prevent employers from going further. Employers are free to adopt stricter rules as part of their management of health and safety, productivity, reputation, and workplace standards.

A total ban may apply to:

• All indoor areas, as required by law
• Outdoor areas such as entrances, car parks, and grounds
• Smoking during paid working time

The key legal issue is not whether a ban exists, but whether it is implemented properly.

2. Does banning smoking outdoors create legal risk?

Banning smoking in outdoor areas is lawful, but it must be approached carefully. Outdoor smoking bans are not required by statute, so employers must rely on management instruction and contractual authority rather than statutory enforcement.

From a legal risk perspective, outdoor bans are most defensible where they are justified by legitimate business reasons, such as:

• Preventing smoke drift into buildings
• Protecting visitors and clients
• Maintaining a professional image
• Reducing litter and fire risk

Problems arise where outdoor bans are introduced abruptly, without consultation, or enforced selectively. While consultation is not legally mandatory in most cases, failure to engage employees can increase resistance and the likelihood of grievances.

3. Can employers ban smoking during working hours?

Employers are entitled to prohibit smoking during working hours, including during paid time. This is particularly common in safety-critical roles, customer-facing environments, and settings where employees are expected to remain on site.

Smoking during unpaid rest breaks may still be restricted to certain locations or prohibited altogether if the employer operates a total ban. There is no legal obligation to permit smoking simply because the time is unpaid.

The legal risk here is not the ban itself, but inconsistency. Allowing some employees to smoke during working hours while disciplining others can quickly undermine the employer’s position in any dispute.

4. What about contractual rights and long-standing practices?

Employers should be cautious where smoking arrangements have existed informally for many years. While employees do not acquire a legal right to smoke, long-standing practices can sometimes be argued to form part of custom and practice.

This does not mean employers are prevented from changing the rules, but it does mean changes should be managed carefully. Sudden withdrawal of informal concessions without notice or explanation can trigger grievances or claims of unfair treatment, even if those claims ultimately fail.

Best practice is to:

• Formalise smoking rules in writing
• Give reasonable notice of changes
• Apply rules consistently across the workforce

5. Employer decision-making at this stage

Employers considering a total smoking ban should be clear on:

• What the law requires: prevention of smoking in smoke-free areas
• What the employer must decide: whether to go beyond the statutory minimum
• What happens if this is mishandled: grievances, morale issues, and inconsistent enforcement claims

A clear, well-communicated policy is far more defensible than ad hoc restrictions applied by individual managers.

Section C summary

Employers can lawfully impose a complete ban on smoking, including outdoor areas and during working hours. The legal risk does not lie in the existence of the ban, but in how it is introduced, justified, and enforced. Consistency, clarity, and alignment with business objectives are critical to avoiding disputes.

Section D: Smoking in work vehicles and during business travel

Smoking in work vehicles is one of the areas where the law is both clear and frequently misunderstood. Employers often assume vehicle rules mirror premises rules exactly, or that smoking is a matter of personal choice where the vehicle is not customer-facing. In reality, smoke-free legislation places specific and enforceable duties on employers in relation to vehicles used for work.

1. When is a work vehicle legally smoke-free?

Under UK smoke-free legislation, any vehicle used for work by more than one person is classed as a smoke-free place. This applies regardless of whether the vehicle is owned by the employer, leased, or privately owned but used for work purposes.

The critical factor is shared use, not ownership.

Examples of smoke-free work vehicles include:

• Company cars shared by more than one employee
• Pool cars
• Vans used by multiple drivers
• Goods vehicles with multiple drivers
• Taxis and private hire vehicles

Smoking is prohibited in these vehicles at all times, including when the vehicle is stationary.

2. Can employees smoke in company cars?

An employee may smoke in a company car only if the vehicle is used exclusively by that individual and only if the employer permits it. This is a matter of employer discretion rather than employee entitlement.

Many employers choose to prohibit smoking even in sole-use vehicles, particularly where vehicles are leased or resold, or where the vehicle may later be allocated to another employee. This is lawful and can be justified on cost, maintenance, and hygiene grounds.

3. Does the ban apply to private vehicles used for work?

Private vehicles are not automatically covered by smoke-free legislation. However, a private vehicle becomes a smoke-free work vehicle if it is:

• Used for work purposes by more than one person, or
• Used for hire or reward

If an employee uses their own vehicle solely for individual business travel, smoking is not prohibited by smoke-free law. That said, employers may still impose contractual or policy restrictions, particularly where employees transport colleagues or clients. This should be assessed alongside broader rules on employees working away from home.

4. What about smoking during business travel?

Smoking rules continue to apply during business travel. This includes:

• Travel between sites
• Client visits
• Temporary work locations

Employers should be clear that smoke-free requirements apply whenever a vehicle falls within the definition of a work vehicle, regardless of whether the journey is routine or occasional.

Grey areas arise where employees share lifts informally or where travel arrangements change at short notice. From a risk perspective, clarity in policy wording is more important than trying to cover every scenario exhaustively.

5. Employer decision-making at this stage

Employers should take a deliberate position on:

• What the law requires: smoking must be prohibited in shared work vehicles
• What the employer must decide: whether to allow smoking in sole-use vehicles
• What happens if this is mishandled: enforcement action, reputational damage, and vehicle remediation costs

Clear rules reduce ambiguity and make enforcement far easier if issues arise.

Section D summary

Smoking is prohibited in any work vehicle used by more than one person. Employers may permit or prohibit smoking in sole-use vehicles at their discretion. Legal risk arises where vehicle use is unclear or where policies fail to reflect how vehicles are actually used in practice.

Section E: Do smokers have rights to vape at work?

As smoking rates decline, disputes about workplace behaviour are increasingly shifting from traditional tobacco use to vaping and other nicotine-containing products. Employers often assume that vaping sits in the same legal category as smoking. In fact, the law treats them very differently, which creates both flexibility and risk.

1. Is vaping covered by smoke-free legislation?

No. The UK’s smoke-free legislation does not apply to e-cigarettes, vaporisers, or other vaping devices. The statutory prohibition on smoking is limited to tobacco products and herbal substances that are lit and capable of being smoked.

This means there is no automatic legal ban on vaping in workplaces or work vehicles under smoke-free law. Employees do not commit a statutory offence by vaping indoors, and employers are not under a statutory duty to prevent it.

However, the absence of a statutory ban does not create a right to vape at work.

2. Can employers ban vaping at work?

Yes. Employers are entitled to regulate or prohibit vaping through workplace rules, policies, and contractual terms. A vaping ban can apply to:

• Indoor areas
• Outdoor areas
• Working hours
• Vehicles

The legal basis for regulating vaping is managerial authority rather than statutory enforcement. This makes policy clarity particularly important.

Employers commonly choose to treat vaping in the same way as smoking for reasons including consistency, professionalism, and the avoidance of confusion or enforcement difficulties.

3. Does banning vaping create discrimination risk?

In most cases, no. As with smoking, vaping is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010. Banning vaping does not, by itself, amount to unlawful discrimination.

That said, employers should be alert to indirect risks. For example, if vaping is used by an employee as part of a smoking cessation programme, heavy-handed enforcement without explanation could undermine employee relations, even if it does not create legal liability.

Clear communication of the rationale for any ban is therefore important.

4. Should vaping be treated differently from smoking?

This is a strategic decision rather than a legal one. Some employers permit vaping in designated areas while prohibiting smoking, often to support harm reduction or cessation efforts. Others prohibit both to maintain clarity and avoid line-management difficulties.

What matters from a legal perspective is that whatever approach is adopted:

• It is documented
• It is communicated clearly
• It is enforced consistently

Allowing vaping informally while prohibiting smoking can create arguments about inconsistency, particularly if enforcement later tightens.

5. Employer decision-making at this stage

Employers should be clear on:

• What the law requires: nothing, in relation to vaping
• What the employer must decide: whether to permit, restrict, or ban vaping
• What happens if this is mishandled: grievances, enforcement inconsistency, reputational issues

The lack of statutory rules makes policy discipline more important, not less.

Section E summary

Employees do not have a legal right to vape at work. Vaping is not covered by smoke-free legislation, but employers are free to regulate or prohibit it through policy and management instruction. Legal risk arises where vaping rules are unclear, inconsistently enforced, or poorly communicated.

Section F: Smoking, homeworking, and outreach roles

As homeworking and outreach work have expanded, employers increasingly face questions about how smoking rules apply outside traditional workplaces. This is one of the most complex areas of smoking regulation, because statutory smoke-free duties intersect with private spaces, health and safety obligations, and professional conduct expectations.

1. Can employers stop homeworkers from smoking during working hours?

In most cases, no. Smoke-free legislation does not apply to private residential accommodation, including an employee’s home, even where that home is designated as the employee’s permanent place of work.

Employers therefore do not have a statutory power to prevent a homeworker from smoking in their own home during working hours. Attempting to impose a blanket prohibition in this context is likely to be unenforceable and counterproductive.

However, this does not mean employers are powerless. The legal position should be understood alongside broader rules on working from home and contractual standards of conduct.

2. Can employers regulate smoking during video calls and virtual meetings?

Yes. Employers are entitled to set standards of professional conduct during working time, including during video calls, client meetings, and internal conferences.

A rule requiring employees not to smoke or vape during video calls is generally lawful and defensible. The justification is not health protection, but professionalism and workplace standards. Employers may treat virtual meetings as equivalent to in-person meetings for behavioural purposes.

The key is to frame the rule correctly. It should be presented as a professional conduct requirement rather than a health and safety prohibition.

3. What about employees exposed to smoke in clients’ homes?

This is where employer duties become more active. While clients’ homes are private spaces, they can also be workplaces for outreach staff, domiciliary carers, health workers, and agency staff.

Employers have a duty under health and safety law to take reasonable steps to protect employees from risks to their health, including exposure to second-hand smoke, where it is reasonably practicable to do so. This duty should be considered alongside the employer’s wider duty of care.

This does not create an absolute obligation to eliminate exposure, but it does require employers to assess the risk and take proportionate action.

4. What reasonable steps can employers take?

Common and defensible measures include:

• Informing clients in advance that employees should not be exposed to smoke during visits
• Requesting that smoking is avoided for a period before and during visits
• Offering alternative meeting locations where feasible
• Allowing staff to withdraw from environments that pose an immediate health risk

Employers should avoid promising absolute protection where this cannot realistically be delivered. The legal standard is reasonableness, not perfection.

5. Employer decision-making at this stage

Employers managing homeworking and outreach roles should be clear on:

• What the law requires: reasonable steps to protect health, not absolute bans
• What the employer must decide: how far professional standards extend into private spaces
• What happens if this is mishandled: health and safety complaints, staff disengagement, or reputational damage

Clear guidance to staff and clients is more effective than rigid rules that cannot be enforced.

Section F summary

Employers cannot generally prevent homeworkers from smoking in their own homes, but they can regulate professional conduct during working time and take reasonable steps to protect outreach staff from exposure to second-hand smoke. Legal risk arises where expectations are unclear or where employers overstate their powers.

Section G: Enforcement, penalties, and employer liability

Understanding how smoking law is enforced is critical for employers. Many organisations underestimate their exposure because enforcement is local rather than high-profile, or because smoking issues are treated informally at site level. In reality, failures in this area can lead to fines, reputational damage, and personal liability for those in control of premises.

1. Who enforces smoke-free law?

Smoke-free legislation is enforced by local authorities, not the police. Environmental health officers are responsible for monitoring compliance, responding to complaints, and issuing enforcement notices or fixed penalties where appropriate.

Complaints can be made by employees, visitors, contractors, or members of the public. They are often anonymous and frequently triggered by ongoing tolerance of smoking rather than isolated incidents.

Once a complaint is received, the authority may:

• Investigate the premises or vehicles
• Request evidence of compliance measures
• Issue fixed penalty notices
• Prosecute where breaches are serious or persistent

Employers should not assume that informal arrangements or “common sense” practices will satisfy enforcement officers.

2. What penalties apply to employers?

Penalties vary slightly across the UK due to devolved legislation, but the structure is broadly consistent.

In England and Wales, employers or those in control of smoke-free premises may face:

• A fixed penalty for failing to display compliant no-smoking signage
• Prosecution for failing to prevent smoking in smoke-free areas
• A maximum court-imposed fine of up to £2,500 for serious breaches

There is no fixed penalty option for failing to prevent smoking. This reflects the seriousness with which the law treats management responsibility.

In Scotland and Northern Ireland, similar enforcement powers exist, with variations in fixed penalty amounts and procedures. Employers operating across multiple jurisdictions should ensure their policies reflect local requirements.

3. Can individual managers be personally liable?

Yes. Liability does not always sit solely with the corporate entity. The law places responsibility on the person who manages or controls the premises or vehicle.

In practice, this can include:

• Site managers
• Operations managers
• Directors with direct control over premises

Where smoking is routinely tolerated, enforcement action may focus on individual decision-makers as well as the organisation.

4. What about penalties for employees?

Employees who smoke in smoke-free areas may be issued with fixed penalty notices or prosecuted. However, enforcement bodies expect employers to take reasonable steps to prevent smoking. Repeated employee offences may therefore reflect poorly on management rather than absolve it.

Relying on individual fines without addressing underlying policy or enforcement failures is unlikely to satisfy regulators.

5. Employer decision-making at this stage

Employers should be clear on:

• What the law requires: active prevention of smoking in smoke-free areas
• What the employer must decide: who is responsible for enforcement and escalation
• What happens if this is mishandled: fines, prosecutions, and personal liability

From a compliance perspective, documented policies, signage, training, and consistent enforcement are all evidence that reasonable steps have been taken.

Section G summary

Smoke-free law is enforced by local authorities and places active duties on employers and those in control of premises. Financial penalties, prosecutions, and personal liability can arise where smoking is tolerated or compliance measures are inadequate. Clear accountability and consistent enforcement are essential to managing risk.

Section H: How employers should document and enforce smoking rules

Once employers understand that smoking is not a protected right and that legal risk sits in inconsistency rather than restriction, the focus shifts to documentation and enforcement. This is where many otherwise compliant organisations create exposure, not through what their policies say, but through how those policies are applied in practice.

1. Do employers need a smoking policy?

There is no statutory requirement to have a written smoking policy. However, from a compliance and risk management perspective, operating without one is increasingly difficult to justify.

A written policy provides:

• Evidence that the employer has taken reasonable steps to comply with smoke-free law
• A clear framework for managers to follow
• A defensible position if enforcement action or disputes arise

In the absence of a policy, enforcement decisions tend to be ad hoc, which is where problems begin. This should be considered alongside wider disciplinary procedure requirements.

2. What should a compliant smoking policy cover?

A smoking policy should be practical rather than aspirational. At a minimum, it should clearly state:

• Where smoking is prohibited by law
• Any additional restrictions imposed by the employer
• Rules on smoking during working hours and breaks
• How vaping is treated
• Rules relating to vehicles, homeworking, and client premises
• The consequences of breaching the policy

Ambiguity is the enemy of compliance. If employees or managers have to guess what is allowed, enforcement will be inconsistent.

3. How should smoking rules be enforced?

Enforcement should be framed as a conduct issue, not a moral or health judgement. Managers should focus on behaviour and compliance, not personal habits.

A proportionate approach typically involves:

• Clear communication of expectations
• Informal correction for first breaches
• Escalation through disciplinary procedures where behaviour persists

Employers should resist the temptation to tolerate repeated breaches because “it’s only smoking”. Repeated tolerance weakens the employer’s position if enforcement later becomes necessary.

4. What role does consistency play?

Consistency is the single most important factor in defending smoking-related disputes. Many grievances are framed not around the existence of restrictions, but around allegations that:

• Certain employees are treated more favourably
• Rules are enforced differently by different managers
• Senior staff are exempt in practice

From a legal perspective, these arguments rarely succeed on their own. From an employee relations perspective, they are highly damaging. Employers should ensure managers are trained on smoking rules and understand that informal exceptions create long-term risk.

5. Employer decision-making at this stage

Employers should be clear on:

• What the law requires: active prevention of smoking in regulated areas
• What the employer must decide: the scope and strictness of internal rules
• What happens if this is mishandled: grievances, tribunal risk, and weakened enforcement credibility

A smoking policy should support managers, not undermine them.

Section H summary

While employers are not legally required to have a smoking policy, operating without one creates unnecessary compliance and enforcement risk. Clear documentation, consistent application, and proportionate enforcement are essential to managing smoking at work lawfully and defensibly.

Smoking at work FAQs: employers’ questions answered

1. Do employees have smokers’ rights at work in the UK?

No. Employees do not have a general legal right to smoke at work. Smoking is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010, and employers are not required to accommodate smoking beyond providing statutory rest breaks and complying with smoke-free legislation.

2. Is smoking considered a disability under UK law?

No. Nicotine addiction is not recognised as a disability under the Equality Act 2010. Employers are not under a duty to make reasonable adjustments to allow smoking or vaping at work.

3. Are employers legally required to allow smoke breaks?

No. Employers are only required to provide statutory or contractual rest breaks. There is no legal obligation to provide additional smoke breaks, and employees who smoke are entitled to the same breaks as non-smokers.

4. Can employers restrict smoking to rest breaks only?

Yes. Employers may lawfully require that smoking only takes place during authorised rest breaks and only in permitted locations. Smoking during paid working time can be prohibited.

5. Can employers ban smoking completely, including outdoors?

Yes. Employers may impose a total smoking ban across their premises, including outdoor areas and during working hours, provided the ban is reasonable, clearly communicated, and enforced consistently.

6. Can employees smoke in company cars?

Smoking is prohibited in any work vehicle used by more than one person. An employer may allow smoking in a sole-use company vehicle, but this is a matter of discretion, not employee entitlement.

7. Do employees have a right to vape at work?

No. Vaping is not covered by smoke-free legislation, but employees do not have a legal right to vape at work. Employers may regulate or prohibit vaping through workplace policies.

8. Can homeworkers smoke during working hours?

Employers cannot generally prevent employees from smoking in their own homes, even where the home is designated as a place of work. However, employers may set professional conduct rules, such as prohibiting smoking during video calls. This should be aligned with an organisation’s working from home policy.

9. Who enforces smoking law in the workplace?

Smoke-free legislation is enforced by local authorities. Employers and those in control of premises can face enforcement action if they fail to prevent smoking in smoke-free areas.

10. What should employers do if an employee challenges smoking restrictions?

Employers should rely on documented policy, apply rules consistently, and handle challenges through appropriate management and HR processes. Where a dispute escalates, it may be dealt with under the organisation’s grievance at work process.

Conclusion

The idea of “smokers’ rights at work” is widely misunderstood. UK employment law does not protect smoking as a right, nor does it require employers to accommodate it. Instead, the law places clear and active duties on employers to prevent smoking in regulated areas and gives them wide discretion to control smoking during working hours and on workplace premises.

For employers, the real legal and commercial risk does not arise from restricting smoking, but from doing so inconsistently or informally. Poorly drafted policies, unmanaged custom and practice, and ad hoc managerial concessions are far more likely to result in grievances, working time disputes, or enforcement action than firm, well-communicated rules.

A compliance-led approach requires employers to understand the limits of employee entitlement, make deliberate decisions about workplace standards, and document those decisions clearly. Where smoking rules are lawful, proportionate, and consistently enforced, employers are well placed to manage legal exposure while maintaining operational control and employee confidence.

Glossary

Useful Links