Holiday Pay on Termination UK 2026: How Much & When It’s Paid

holiday pay

SECTION GUIDE

Holiday pay on termination of employment in the UK refers to the payment an employee or worker is entitled to for unused annual leave when their employment ends, whether through resignation, dismissal, redundancy, the expiry of a fixed-term contract or another form of termination.

What this article is about: This is a compliance-grade employer guide to Holiday Pay on Termination UK. It explains what the law requires, what HR and payroll must decide and do at the point of exit and what exposure follows if you get it wrong. It also deals with higher-risk scenarios such as notice, PILON, garden leave, overused holiday, contractual holiday above statutory minimum and irregular hours arrangements.

 

Section A: What are employers legally required to pay for unused holiday when employment ends?

When an employment relationship ends, employers must treat holiday pay as a statutory exit obligation, not a discretionary payroll item. The legal baseline is that workers must receive a payment for statutory annual leave that has accrued but not been taken by the termination date. This is commonly described as “payment in lieu of holiday”, but employers should be careful with wording: payment in lieu of unused holiday is only permitted on termination, because the statutory scheme expects holiday to be taken as rest during employment and not routinely “bought out” while the individual remains employed.

 

1. What the law requires

The Working Time Regulations 1998 give most workers a statutory minimum of 5.6 weeks’ paid holiday per leave year. Statutory entitlement may include bank and public holidays where the contract provides for this. Where the contract ends part-way through the leave year, statutory leave entitlement is pro-rated to the termination date. If the worker has untaken statutory leave at that point, the employer must make a payment in lieu for that unused balance.

The practical effect is straightforward:

  • the employer must identify how much statutory leave has accrued up to the termination date
  • the employer must identify how much statutory leave has been taken
  • any unused statutory balance must be paid at the correct holiday pay rate (covered later in the calculation section)

 

This duty applies regardless of the reason for termination. A worker does not lose the right to be paid for accrued statutory holiday because they resigned, were dismissed, left on poor terms or did not follow an internal process. Where there is a dispute, the risk route is often framed as an unlawful deduction from wages and employers should assume that miscalculation can quickly become a formal complaint.

 

2. Who is covered: employees and “workers”

Employers should not limit their analysis to employees. The statutory annual leave framework applies to “workers” as well as employees. That matters operationally because many businesses have individuals engaged on arrangements labelled as casual, bank, zero-hours, seasonal or contractor-style relationships, where status may be disputed. If the individual is a worker in law, the obligation to pay for accrued statutory holiday on termination still applies.

For HR risk management, the status point is not academic. Where you treat someone as self-employed but the reality is worker status, termination will often trigger backdated holiday pay claims. Final pay disputes can become the entry point for wider liability arguments.

 

3. What employers must decide and do

At termination, HR and payroll should run a structured decision sequence:

  • confirm the contractual termination date (this drives accrual)
  • confirm the leave year and the statutory entitlement baseline
  • confirm leave taken and whether any carry-over exists (and on what basis)
  • separate statutory leave from contractual leave (because the legal treatment may differ)
  • calculate the payment in lieu and itemise it clearly on the final payslip

 

The termination date is central. If you are paying in lieu of notice, placing the employee on garden leave or ending employment immediately for gross misconduct, you must still identify the legally operative end date for accrual. Employers commonly create disputes by treating the “last day worked” as the termination date when the contract actually ends later, or by assuming holiday does not accrue when the individual is not actively attending work.

 

4. Statutory holiday vs contractual holiday: why the distinction matters

Statutory holiday must be paid if accrued and untaken at termination. Contractual holiday above the statutory minimum is different. Many contracts provide enhanced entitlement (for example, 30 days plus bank holidays). Whether enhanced leave must be paid out on exit depends primarily on contract terms and how the contractual entitlement is structured and applied in practice.

From an employer risk perspective, the danger is inconsistent treatment. If you have historically paid enhanced leave on exit or your policies imply that untaken contractual leave is paid, you can create expectation and dispute risk even if the contract is not explicit. Conversely, if you refuse to pay anything beyond the statutory minimum, you need to be sure your contract drafting and past practice supports that position.

This is why holiday pay on termination should be treated as both a legal compliance and a policy governance issue. It is not enough to “do what payroll usually does” if you cannot defend the approach consistently across leavers.

 

5. What happens if you get it wrong

Holiday pay errors at termination are high-risk because they are easy for individuals to challenge and easy for tribunals to understand. Employers face exposure in several directions:

  • underpayment claims framed as unlawful deduction from wages
  • knock-on disputes about worker status and historic holiday pay
  • employee relations damage at the point of exit, with reputational impact
  • operational cost: management time, reconciliation work, legal spend and settlement pressure

 

The commercial issue is not only the quantum of underpaid holiday. It is that termination is a trigger event: once final pay is disputed, employees and advisers often scrutinise everything else, including notice pay, bonuses, commission, deductions, expenses and contract compliance.

 

6. Section Summary

Employers must pay workers for accrued but untaken statutory annual leave when employment ends. This is a statutory obligation that applies regardless of the reason for leaving and it is only permissible to “pay in lieu” of unused holiday at the point of termination, not during ongoing employment. The employer’s operational risk sits in three areas: getting the termination date wrong, failing to distinguish statutory vs contractual leave and mismanaging worker status edge cases. The safest approach is a documented leaver process that identifies entitlement, confirms leave taken, calculates correctly and itemises payment transparently.

 

Section B: How should holiday pay on termination be calculated in practice?

For employers, the legal risk around holiday pay on termination rarely sits in whether payment is due. It sits in how the payment is calculated, which rate of pay is used and whether the calculation can be defended if challenged. This is where payroll shortcuts, outdated assumptions and poorly configured systems most often lead to underpayment claims.

This section focuses on the practical mechanics of calculating holiday pay on termination in a way that aligns with current UK law and withstands scrutiny from employees, advisers and tribunals.

 

1. What the law requires

When paying for unused statutory holiday on termination, employers must calculate pay based on what the worker would have earned had they actually taken the holiday. The underlying legal principle is that holiday pay should reflect normal remuneration, not basic pay alone, where pay fluctuates. What constitutes “normal remuneration” is shaped by case law rather than exhaustively defined in statute.

Holiday entitlement accrues progressively throughout the leave year. There is no concept in law of holiday accruing “in advance”, even though many employers administer accrual monthly for simplicity. On termination, entitlement must be calculated up to the contractual termination date and then reduced by any statutory leave already taken.

Where a worker has accrued unused statutory holiday, that balance must be paid at the correct rate. Employers cannot substitute convenience for accuracy if the two diverge.

 

2. How statutory holiday accrues up to termination

In most cases, statutory holiday entitlement is calculated on a pro-rata basis using the leave year as the reference point. The legal framework allows employers to use a standard statutory formula unless the contract provides a different, lawful method.

In broad terms, the calculation involves:

  • identifying the statutory entitlement for the leave year
  • calculating the proportion of the leave year elapsed at termination
  • deducting statutory leave already taken

 

This produces the statutory holiday balance due.

The risk point is that many employers treat accrual as a simple monthly fraction without checking whether this aligns with the actual termination date or the leave year. Small discrepancies can lead to underpayment, particularly where employment ends mid-month or where notice arrangements extend the contractual end date beyond the last working day.

 

3. Which rate of pay applies?

Holiday pay on termination must be paid at the worker’s normal rate of pay. This is where miscalculations most often occur.

For workers with fixed hours and fixed pay, this will usually align with basic salary. However, for many roles, holiday pay must reflect more than just contractual base pay. Employers should ensure their approach to holiday pay calculations captures all pay elements that form part of normal remuneration.

Depending on the working arrangement, this can include:

  • regular overtime
  • commission payments
  • allowances that are normally paid and linked to work performed

 

The key test is whether the pay element forms part of the worker’s normal remuneration. If it does, excluding it from holiday pay on termination creates underpayment risk. For higher-risk pay patterns, employers should sanity-check their approach to overtime and holiday pay and commission and holiday pay.

 

4. The 52-week reference period and why it matters

For workers whose pay varies, holiday pay must be calculated using the statutory reference period. The current position is a 52-week averaging period, counting back from the calculation date and excluding weeks in which the worker was not paid. Where necessary, employers can look back up to 104 weeks to identify 52 paid weeks.

This applies equally to holiday pay paid during employment and holiday pay paid on termination.

From an employer risk perspective, this means:

  • payroll systems must retain sufficient historic pay data
  • calculations must exclude unpaid weeks rather than diluting the average
  • manual intervention may be required for recent starters or irregular work patterns

 

Using a shorter averaging period or defaulting to basic pay for convenience is a common source of claims.

 

5. Fixed hours, variable hours and irregular work patterns

The calculation approach must reflect the worker’s contractual reality.

For full-time employees with fixed hours and stable pay, holiday pay on termination is usually straightforward, provided regular overtime and allowances are properly captured.

For workers with variable hours, zero-hours arrangements or fluctuating pay, the calculation is more complex. The reference period becomes critical and employers must ensure that the average pay used genuinely reflects what the worker would have earned if they had taken holiday instead of leaving.

From a compliance perspective, this is an area where employers should assume heightened scrutiny. Many holiday pay disputes arise precisely because variable pay has been simplified or approximated without legal justification.

 

6. What employers must decide and do

At the point of termination, employers should make deliberate decisions rather than default assumptions:

  • confirm whether the worker’s pay is fixed or variable
  • identify all elements of normal remuneration that must be included
  • apply the correct reference period where pay varies
  • ensure the calculation aligns with the contractual termination date
  • document the calculation in case of challenge

 

For HR and payroll teams, the practical control is not the formula itself but the inputs. Most underpayments arise from missing pay elements or incorrect averaging, not from misunderstanding the legal entitlement.

 

7. What happens if employers get the calculation wrong

Calculation errors expose employers to more than just the difference in pay. They can lead to:

  • unlawful deduction of wages claims
  • claims covering multiple pay periods if underpayment is systemic
  • leverage for broader exit disputes
  • reputational damage where patterns emerge

 

Because holiday pay calculations are relatively transparent, errors are easy for advisers to spot and difficult to defend once identified.

 

8. Section Summary

Holiday pay on termination must be calculated using accrued statutory entitlement and paid at the worker’s normal rate of pay, not a simplified or convenient figure. The 52-week reference period, inclusion of regular pay elements and accurate identification of the termination date are central to compliance. Employers that rely on payroll shortcuts or outdated assumptions risk underpayment claims that extend beyond the immediate leaver and expose wider payroll practices.

 

Section C: How do notice, PILON and garden leave affect holiday pay on termination?

Notice arrangements are one of the most common sources of error in holiday pay on termination. Employers often focus on the last day the individual attended work, rather than the contractual termination date, which is what drives holiday accrual and payment obligations. Where notice, pay in lieu of notice (PILON) or garden leave are involved, the distinction becomes critical.

This section explains how different notice scenarios affect holiday accrual, entitlement and payment, and what employers must do to avoid overpayment or underpayment risk.

 

1. Does holiday continue to accrue during the notice period?

As a general rule, statutory holiday continues to accrue until the employment contract legally ends. This applies whether the employee is:

  • working their notice as normal
  • placed on garden leave
  • willing to work but instructed not to attend

 

The key point for employers is that holiday accrual is tied to the existence of the employment contract, not to whether the employee is actively working. If the contract remains in force, statutory holiday continues to accrue.

This frequently catches employers out where notice is lengthy or where individuals are removed from duties early. Treating the last working day as the cut-off point for holiday accrual, when the contract ends later, can result in underpayment.

 

2. How does garden leave affect holiday pay?

Garden leave keeps the employment contract alive while removing the employee from active duties. During garden leave:

  • salary continues to be paid
  • contractual benefits usually continue
  • statutory holiday entitlement continues to accrue

 

Employers may also require employees to take accrued holiday during garden leave, provided the contract allows this or the employer gives appropriate statutory notice. If holiday is validly taken during garden leave, it reduces the balance payable on termination.

From a risk perspective, employers must ensure that any instruction to take holiday during garden leave is clear, lawful and properly recorded. Failure to do so can result in disputes over whether leave was actually taken or whether it remains payable at termination.

 

3. What changes if notice is paid in lieu (PILON)?

PILON introduces a different analysis because it can bring the employment contract to an immediate end.

Where there is a contractual pay in lieu of notice clause and the employer exercises it, the contract will usually terminate immediately on payment. In that case:

  • holiday accrues up to the termination date only
  • there is no ongoing accrual during the period covered by the PILON payment

 

Where PILON is paid without a contractual right, the legal position can be more complex and may give rise to breach of contract issues. However, for holiday pay purposes, the key question remains the contractual termination date.

Employers should be precise. Paying a sum labelled as PILON does not, by itself, determine whether holiday accrues. What matters is whether the contract ends immediately or continues to run.

 

4. Can employers require employees to take holiday during notice?

Employers can require employees to take holiday during their notice period, provided they comply with the statutory notice requirements under the Working Time Regulations or rely on a valid contractual clause.

If holiday is properly required and taken during notice, it reduces the amount of unused holiday payable on termination. However, employers should be cautious about last-minute instructions, particularly where notice is short or the employee disputes the validity of the requirement.

From an HR risk perspective, poorly communicated or non-compliant instructions to take holiday can lead to arguments that leave was not validly taken and must still be paid.

 

5. What if the employee leaves without working their notice?

Where an employee leaves without working their notice and without agreement, holiday entitlement generally accrues only up to their actual termination date. Employers are not required to continue accruing holiday beyond the point at which the contract ends.

However, employers should be careful not to conflate breach of notice obligations with holiday pay rights. Accrued statutory holiday up to the termination date must still be paid, regardless of how the employee left or whether the employer intends to pursue a claim for breach of contract.

 

6. What employers must decide and do

When notice arrangements are involved, employers should:

  • identify the contractual termination date, not just the last working day
  • confirm whether notice is worked, covered by garden leave or ended by PILON
  • check whether holiday has been validly required and taken during notice
  • ensure accrual calculations align with the contractual end date
  • itemise holiday pay clearly in the final payslip

 

The operational risk lies in assumptions. Payroll often defaults to “last day worked”, while HR may assume PILON automatically stops accrual. Both assumptions can be wrong.

 

7. What happens if employers get this wrong

Errors around notice and holiday accrual commonly lead to:

  • underpayment of holiday pay
  • disputes over termination dates
  • allegations of unlawful deduction from wages
  • escalation into wider contractual disputes

 

Because notice arrangements are usually documented, inconsistencies between HR records, payroll calculations and contractual terms are easy for employees and advisers to identify.

 

8. Section Summary

Holiday entitlement continues to accrue until the employment contract legally ends. During working notice and garden leave, accrual continues. Where PILON is exercised and the contract ends immediately, accrual stops at that point. Employers must focus on the contractual termination date, not assumptions about attendance or payment, and must carefully document any requirement for holiday to be taken during notice. Getting this wrong exposes employers to avoidable underpayment claims and exit disputes.

 

Section D: What about contractual holiday above the statutory minimum?

Once statutory holiday has been identified and dealt with, the next employer decision point is contractual holiday entitlement above the statutory minimum. This is where legal obligation gives way to contractual interpretation, policy consistency and risk management. Many disputes over holiday pay on termination arise not because employers misunderstand statutory rules, but because they underestimate the exposure created by enhanced holiday arrangements.

This section focuses on what employers are required to pay, what they may lawfully limit and where silence or inconsistency creates avoidable risk.

 

1. Is an employer required to pay enhanced contractual holiday on termination?

Unlike statutory holiday, there is no automatic legal requirement to pay enhanced contractual holiday on termination. Whether payment is due depends on the terms of the contract of employment and how the entitlement is structured and applied in practice.

If the contract expressly states that unused contractual holiday above the statutory minimum will be paid on termination, the employer must honour that commitment. Equally, if the contract clearly limits payment to statutory holiday only, that limitation will usually be enforceable, provided it is applied consistently.

Risk arises where contracts are silent or ambiguous. Silence alone does not guarantee that enhanced holiday is payable, but where contractual holiday is presented as a single blended entitlement rather than clearly segmented, employees may argue that all accrued leave is payable on exit.

 

2. Why contractual structure and drafting matter

From a compliance and governance perspective, the way contractual holiday is drafted and described is critical.

Employers face increased exposure where:

  • contracts refer to a single total holiday entitlement without separating statutory and additional leave
  • policies do not explain how enhanced leave is treated on termination
  • payroll systems do not distinguish between statutory and contractual days
  • managers routinely tell employees that “unused holiday is paid when you leave” without qualification

 

In these scenarios, employees may reasonably assume that all accrued holiday is payable. This assumption becomes harder to challenge if the employer’s documentation and behaviour point in the same direction.

 

3. Custom and practice and implied terms risk

Even where contracts attempt to limit payment to statutory holiday only, employers should consider whether custom and practice has created an implied term.

If an employer has consistently paid enhanced contractual holiday on termination over time, employees may argue that this has become an implied contractual right. This risk is heightened for long-serving employees, senior staff or roles with individually negotiated benefits.

From a commercial perspective, the issue is not just whether the employer ultimately succeeds in resisting payment, but whether the cost and disruption of the dispute outweighs the value of the holiday in question.

 

4. What employers must decide and do

At termination, employers should make an explicit, defensible decision on contractual holiday rather than defaulting to habit:

  • check whether the contract clearly distinguishes statutory and additional holiday
  • confirm whether there is an express provision on payment of enhanced leave
  • consider whether past practice undermines a restrictive clause
  • ensure payroll calculations reflect the intended legal position
  • communicate the position clearly to the departing employee

 

From an HR strategy perspective, this is also a forward-looking issue. If enhanced holiday is offered as part of a reward proposition, contracts and policies should be reviewed to ensure termination treatment is clearly addressed.

 

5. Commercial and compliance consequences of getting this wrong

Errors or inconsistency around contractual holiday can lead to:

  • breach of contract claims
  • employee relations fallout at exit
  • inconsistent treatment across leavers
  • pressure to settle disputes to avoid escalation

 

While the financial value of contractual holiday disputes may appear limited, the reputational and governance implications are often more significant, particularly where senior or high-profile exits are involved.

 

6. Section Summary

Payment of enhanced contractual holiday on termination is governed by contract, not statute. Employers must be clear whether contractual holiday above the statutory minimum is payable and must ensure that contracts, policies and practice align. Ambiguity, silence or inconsistent treatment creates dispute risk and can turn a manageable exit payment into a contested contractual issue. Clear drafting and disciplined application are the most effective controls.

 

Section E: What if an employee has taken more holiday than they accrued?

Overused holiday is a common issue at termination, particularly where employees take leave early in the leave year, during notice or where termination is unexpected. Employers often assume they can simply deduct the value of excess holiday from final pay. In law, that assumption is risky.

This section explains when employers can recover overused holiday, when they cannot and what controls must be in place to avoid unlawful deduction claims.

 

1. Can employers recover holiday taken in excess of entitlement?

An employer may only recover the value of holiday taken in excess of accrued entitlement if there is a lawful basis to do so. That basis must come from either:

  • an express term in the employment contract permitting recovery or deduction
  • a separate written agreement with the employee authorising the deduction

 

Without one of these, deducting money from final pay is likely to amount to an unlawful deduction from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The fact that the employee has objectively taken more holiday than they accrued does not, by itself, give the employer a right to recover the overpayment.

 

2. Why contractual wording is critical

Many employers rely on broadly worded clauses stating that holiday is taken “in advance” or that overused holiday “may be deducted”. Vague or poorly drafted clauses increase risk rather than reduce it.

To support lawful recovery, contractual wording should:

  • clearly state that holiday may be taken in advance of accrual
  • expressly permit deduction of overused holiday from final pay on termination
  • explain how the value of the deduction will be calculated

 

Where these elements are missing or ambiguous, employers may still attempt recovery but should assume a high likelihood of challenge.

 

3. Interaction with National Minimum Wage rules

Even where a contractual deduction clause exists, employers must consider National Minimum Wage compliance. Deductions for overused holiday can reduce pay below the minimum wage in certain circumstances.

As a general rule:

  • deductions linked to the employee’s own conduct or choice, such as leaving mid-year after taking advanced holiday, may lawfully reduce pay below NMW if the employee agreed in advance
  • deductions imposed without agreement or not linked to the employee’s actions may breach NMW rules

 

This creates a compliance intersection between employment law and wage enforcement that employers often overlook.

 

4. What if the employee disputes the deduction?

Where an employee disputes a deduction for overused holiday, the employer bears the evidential burden. Payroll accuracy alone is not enough. The employer must be able to point to:

  • a valid contractual or written authority for the deduction
  • a defensible calculation of overused holiday
  • compliance with National Minimum Wage requirements

 

If any of these elements are missing, the safest commercial option may be not to deduct at all and instead treat the overpayment as a cost of exit.

 

5. What employers must decide and do

At termination, employers should not default to deduction. They should:

  • confirm whether the employee has taken more holiday than accrued
  • check whether the contract clearly authorises recovery
  • assess NMW implications before making any deduction
  • decide whether recovery is proportionate and defensible
  • communicate the position transparently to the employee

 

From a risk management perspective, consistency matters. Selective recovery increases the risk of discrimination or unfairness arguments.

 

6. What happens if employers get this wrong

Improper deductions expose employers to:

  • claims for unlawful deduction from wages
  • National Minimum Wage enforcement action
  • escalation of relatively small disputes into formal proceedings
  • reputational damage where exit handling is perceived as heavy-handed

 

In practice, disputes over overused holiday often become symbolic. Employees may accept losing holiday pay but strongly resist deductions they see as unfair or unexpected.

 

7. Section Summary

Employers can only recover overused holiday on termination where there is clear contractual or written authority and where deductions comply with National Minimum Wage rules. Payroll logic alone is not enough. Without proper authority, deductions are likely to be unlawful. Employers should treat recovery decisions as a risk-managed choice, not an automatic entitlement, and ensure contracts and policies clearly address holiday taken in advance.

 

Section F: How do irregular hours and part-year workers change the analysis?

Holiday pay on termination becomes significantly more complex where workers do not have fixed hours or a standard working pattern. This is an area that has seen recent legislative change and one where employers are at heightened risk if they rely on outdated assumptions or partial understanding of the post-2024 framework.

This section explains how holiday entitlement and pay should be handled on termination for irregular hours and part-year workers, and what employers must actively decide to remain compliant.

 

1. Why irregular hours and part-year workers require a different approach

Irregular hours and part-year workers are those whose paid hours vary from week to week or who work only part of the year. Common examples include zero-hours staff, bank workers, seasonal staff and casual arrangements.

For these workers, traditional pro-rata calculations based on fixed working patterns can produce distorted outcomes. Historically, this led to litigation and uncertainty, particularly where part-year workers were disproportionately advantaged by standard accrual models that did not reflect actual hours worked.

 

2. The post-2024 statutory framework

For leave years starting on or after 1 April 2024, employers may choose to calculate statutory holiday entitlement for irregular hours and part-year workers using a percentage-based accrual method. Under this model, statutory holiday accrues at 12.07% of hours worked in the relevant pay period.

The critical compliance point is that this method is optional, not mandatory. Employers may continue to use other lawful accrual methods, but whichever method is chosen must be applied consistently and must not be mixed within the same leave year.

Where the 12.07% method is adopted, entitlement is directly linked to hours actually worked. This can simplify calculations and reduce anomalies, but it also requires accurate time and pay records.

 

3. How termination affects holiday pay for irregular hours workers

On termination, employers must calculate how much statutory holiday has accrued up to the contractual termination date under the chosen accrual method, and then identify how much has been taken.

Where the 12.07% method is used, employers must:

  • calculate total hours worked in the relevant accrual period
  • apply the 12.07% rate to determine accrued entitlement
  • deduct any statutory holiday already taken
  • pay the unused balance at the correct holiday pay rate

 

Holiday pay itself continues to be calculated using the 52-week reference period for pay, excluding weeks with no pay and extending back up to 104 weeks if required. Employers must not confuse the accrual mechanism with the pay calculation mechanism, as they operate separately.

 

4. Transitional and consistency risks

One of the most significant risks for employers is inconsistency. Problems commonly arise where:

  • different accrual methods are applied to similar groups of workers
  • methods are changed without documentation or contractual alignment
  • leave years span periods before and after April 2024
  • payroll systems have not been updated to reflect the chosen approach

 

In termination scenarios, these inconsistencies are often exposed because final pay calculations are scrutinised more closely than day-to-day payroll.

 

5. What employers must decide and do

For irregular hours and part-year workers, employers should make deliberate, documented decisions rather than ad hoc calculations:

  • decide whether to adopt the 12.07% accrual method
  • ensure contracts and policies reflect the chosen method
  • configure payroll and time-recording systems accordingly
  • apply the method consistently across comparable workers
  • retain records to evidence entitlement and pay calculations on termination

 

From a risk management perspective, clarity and consistency are more important than which lawful method is chosen.

 

6. What happens if employers get this wrong

Misapplying the post-2024 framework can expose employers to:

  • underpayment or overpayment of holiday pay
  • backdated claims across multiple workers
  • arguments that payroll systems are fundamentally non-compliant
  • increased scrutiny in audits, disputes or transactions

 

Because this area has recently changed, employers should expect advisers and tribunals to look closely at how decisions were made and implemented, not just at the final figures.

 

7. Section Summary

For leave years starting on or after 1 April 2024, employers may calculate statutory holiday entitlement for irregular hours and part-year workers using the 12.07% accrual method, but this is optional and must be applied consistently within a leave year. On termination, accrued entitlement must be calculated under the chosen method and unused holiday paid at the correct rate using the statutory pay reference period. Inconsistency, poor documentation and system misalignment are the primary sources of risk in this area.

 

Section G: What are the consequences of getting holiday pay on termination wrong?

Holiday pay on termination is one of the most common triggers for formal employment disputes. From a legal and commercial perspective, errors in this area are rarely contained. A relatively small underpayment can escalate quickly into a broader challenge to payroll practices, worker status and contractual compliance.

This section explains the legal, financial and reputational consequences employers face when holiday pay on termination is handled incorrectly.

 

1. What claims can employees bring?

The most common route for challenge is a claim for unlawful deduction from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996. Holiday pay is treated as wages for this purpose, meaning that any failure to pay accrued entitlement, or any unauthorised deduction, can give rise to a claim.

Employees may also frame claims as:

  • breach of contract, particularly in relation to contractual holiday
  • failure to comply with statutory obligations under the Working Time Regulations
  • backdated holiday pay claims where underpayment forms part of a series of deductions

 

Where worker status is disputed, holiday pay on termination often becomes the entry point for wider arguments that the individual was misclassified throughout their engagement. This can significantly increase liability beyond the termination event itself.

 

2. Tribunal remedies and financial exposure

Employment tribunals do not impose punitive fines for holiday pay errors, but the financial exposure for employers can still be significant.

Remedies commonly include:

  • payment of the unpaid holiday pay
  • arrears where a series of deductions is established
  • interest on sums awarded
  • management time, legal costs and internal resource diversion

 

Employers should also be aware that holiday pay disputes may progress through employment tribunal claims, increasing visibility and scrutiny of payroll practices that would otherwise remain internal.

 

3. Enforcement and regulatory risk

Although most holiday pay disputes are brought by individuals, employers should not ignore the wider enforcement context. Systemic underpayment, particularly where it interacts with variable pay or deductions, can attract scrutiny in relation to National Minimum Wage compliance.

From a governance perspective, holiday pay errors may also surface during audits, due diligence exercises or internal reviews, creating downstream risk in corporate transactions, restructures or funding rounds.

 

4. Reputational and employee relations impact

Termination disputes carry reputational risk because they often occur at a point when employees are more willing to escalate issues. Former employees may:

  • seek external advice and pursue formal claims
  • raise concerns with regulators or enforcement bodies
  • influence current employees’ perception of fairness and trust

 

In senior exits or collective redundancy situations, holiday pay errors can undermine confidence in the employer’s process and increase resistance to wider organisational change.

 

5. Commercial consequences beyond the immediate dispute

The commercial impact of getting holiday pay on termination wrong is rarely limited to the value of the holiday pay itself. Employers may face:

  • pressure to settle disputes to avoid escalation
  • disproportionate legal spend relative to the sums in issue
  • disruption to HR and payroll operations
  • exposure of broader compliance weaknesses

 

Because termination is a predictable event, tribunals and advisers are generally unsympathetic to arguments that errors were accidental or purely administrative.

 

6. What employers must decide and do

To manage risk effectively, employers should treat holiday pay on termination as a controlled compliance process rather than a routine payroll task:

  • audit termination calculations periodically
  • ensure payroll systems reflect current legal rules
  • escalate complex or high-risk cases rather than relying on assumptions
  • correct errors promptly where identified

 

Early resolution of mistakes often limits exposure far more effectively than defensive positioning once a claim has been issued.

 

7. Section Summary

Errors in holiday pay on termination expose employers to unlawful deduction claims, backdated liability, regulatory scrutiny and reputational damage. While the financial value of individual disputes may be modest, escalation risk is high. Employers that approach termination holiday pay as a structured compliance obligation, rather than an administrative afterthought, are far better placed to contain both legal and commercial risk.

 

Section H: What should employers do to manage holiday pay risk at termination?

From a governance and risk perspective, holiday pay on termination should be treated as a high-risk payroll event, not a routine administrative task. Most disputes arise not because the law is unclear, but because employers lack a consistent, documented approach at the point of exit. This section focuses on how employers can reduce exposure through structure, decision-making discipline and forward planning.

 

1. What the law requires employers to get right every time

At a minimum, employers must ensure that:

  • statutory holiday entitlement is correctly accrued up to the contractual termination date
  • unused statutory holiday is paid at the correct rate of normal remuneration
  • deductions are only made where lawfully authorised
  • calculations are transparent, accurate and defensible

 

Failure in any one of these areas can undermine the entire final pay process and expose the employer to challenge.

 

2. Building a defensible leaver process

Employers should operate a formal termination checklist that brings together HR, payroll and legal considerations. This process should not sit solely with payroll and should be embedded within wider HR compliance controls.

A defensible leaver process will typically include:

  • confirmation of the contractual termination date, not just the last day worked
  • identification of the applicable leave year
  • separation of statutory and contractual holiday entitlement
  • confirmation of holiday taken and any lawful carry-over
  • application of the correct pay reference period
  • review of any proposed deductions against contractual authority and National Minimum Wage rules

 

The objective is consistency and auditability, not speed.

 

3. Contract and policy controls

Many termination disputes can be prevented well before employment ends. Employers should review contracts and policies to ensure they clearly address:

  • how statutory and contractual holiday are defined and distinguished
  • whether enhanced holiday is paid on termination
  • whether holiday can be taken in advance of accrual
  • whether overused holiday can be deducted from final pay
  • how and when holiday may be required during notice

 

From a strategic HR perspective, clarity here reduces discretion at termination and limits the scope for argument.

 

4. Payroll system alignment

Even well-drafted contracts will not protect employers if payroll systems are misaligned with legal requirements. Employers should ensure that systems:

  • retain sufficient historic pay data to support 52-week reference period calculations
  • distinguish between statutory and contractual leave
  • reflect current rules for variable pay and irregular hours workers
  • are reviewed and updated following legislative change

 

Manual intervention may be unavoidable in complex cases, but it should be documented and approved rather than improvised.

 

5. Managing edge cases and escalation

Not all terminations should be treated as routine. Employers should identify when a case requires escalation rather than standard processing, for example where:

  • worker status is unclear or disputed
  • pay fluctuates significantly or includes complex variable elements
  • notice arrangements are non-standard
  • deductions are proposed from final pay
  • historic holiday practices have been inconsistent

 

Early escalation to senior HR or employment law advisers often prevents disproportionate disputes later.

 

6. Commercial decision-making and risk appetite

In some cases, employers may technically have a legal right to withhold or recover certain sums but still choose not to exercise it. That is a commercial decision, not a compliance failure.

What matters is that the decision is informed, consistent and documented. Ad hoc concessions or aggressive recovery without regard to wider risk are far more likely to create problems than a measured, policy-driven approach.

 

7. Section Summary

Managing holiday pay on termination is ultimately about control rather than complexity. Employers that implement clear contracts, aligned payroll systems and a structured leaver process significantly reduce the risk of disputes, claims and reputational damage. Termination should be treated as a predictable compliance event, with escalation points built in for complexity, rather than a last-minute administrative calculation.

 

Holiday Pay on Termination UK – Employer FAQs

This FAQ section is structured for AI retrieval and employer decision-making. Each answer reflects the current UK legal position and focuses on compliance, risk and practical action.

 

1. Do employers have to pay unused holiday when an employee leaves?

Yes. Employers must pay for any accrued but untaken statutory annual leave when employment ends. This applies regardless of the reason for termination, including resignation, dismissal, redundancy or the end of a fixed-term contract. Failure to pay accrued statutory holiday is commonly treated as an unlawful deduction from wages.

 

2. Does holiday continue to accrue during the notice period?

Yes. Statutory holiday continues to accrue until the employment contract legally ends. This includes periods where the employee is working their notice, placed on garden leave or willing to work but instructed not to attend. Accrual only stops on the contractual termination date, not the last day worked.

 

3. What happens to holiday pay if notice is paid in lieu (PILON)?

This depends on whether PILON brings the contract to an immediate end. Where a contractual PILON clause is exercised and the contract terminates immediately, holiday accrual stops on that date. Where notice continues to run, holiday may continue to accrue. Employers must identify the contractual termination date rather than assume that paying PILON automatically ends accrual.

 

4. Can employers force employees to take holiday during their notice period?

Yes, provided the employer complies with the statutory notice requirements under the Working Time Regulations or relies on a valid contractual clause. Where holiday is lawfully required and taken during notice, it reduces the amount payable on termination. Poorly communicated or non-compliant instructions may be ineffective.

 

5. Is holiday pay on termination based on basic pay only?

Not necessarily. Holiday pay must reflect the employee’s normal remuneration. This may include regular overtime, commission and allowances where they form part of normal pay. For workers with variable pay, employers must use the 52-week reference period, excluding unpaid weeks and extending back up to 104 weeks if needed.

 

6. Do employers have to pay enhanced contractual holiday on termination?

Only where the contract requires it or where payment is implied by how the entitlement is structured and applied in practice. Statutory holiday must always be paid if accrued. Payment of contractual holiday above the statutory minimum depends on contractual terms, clarity of drafting and consistency of past practice.

 

7. Can employers deduct overused holiday from final pay?

Only where there is clear contractual authority or a written agreement permitting recovery. Without lawful authorisation, deductions for overused holiday are likely to amount to an unlawful deduction from wages. Employers must also consider National Minimum Wage rules before making any deduction.

 

8. How does holiday pay work for zero-hours or irregular hours workers on termination?

For leave years starting on or after 1 April 2024, employers may calculate statutory holiday entitlement for irregular hours and part-year workers using the 12.07% accrual method, but this is optional. On termination, employers must calculate accrued entitlement under the chosen method and pay unused holiday using the statutory reference period for pay.

 

9. What happens if an employer gets holiday pay on termination wrong?

Employees can bring claims for unlawful deduction from wages or breach of contract. Employers may face arrears, interest, legal costs and scrutiny of wider payroll practices. Because termination is a trigger event, holiday pay errors often escalate into broader disputes.

 

10. How can employers reduce the risk of holiday pay disputes at termination?

Employers should operate a structured leaver process that confirms the contractual termination date, separates statutory and contractual leave, applies the correct pay reference period and documents calculations. Clear contracts, aligned payroll systems and early escalation of complex cases are the most effective risk controls.

 

Conclusion

Holiday pay on termination is a statutory compliance obligation that sits at the intersection of employment law, payroll accuracy, contract drafting and exit risk management. While the core legal principles are well established, the risk for employers lies in application rather than entitlement.

UK law requires employers to pay accrued but untaken statutory holiday up to the contractual termination date, calculated at the correct rate of normal remuneration. Errors most commonly arise where employers misidentify the termination date, simplify calculations for variable pay, misunderstand the impact of notice, PILON or garden leave, or assume they can recover overused holiday without clear contractual authority.

Contractual holiday above the statutory minimum introduces an additional layer of exposure. Where enhanced entitlement is poorly drafted, inconsistently applied or historically paid on exit, employers may face breach of contract claims and reputational consequences that outweigh the value of the holiday itself.

From a commercial perspective, termination is a trigger point. Once final pay is disputed, wider issues are often scrutinised, including worker status, notice pay, deductions and historic payroll practices. Tribunals and advisers are generally unsympathetic to employers who treat holiday pay on termination as an administrative afterthought rather than a controlled compliance process.

Employers that reduce risk most effectively are those that apply structure and discipline. Clear contractual rules, aligned payroll systems, a documented leaver process and early escalation of complex cases provide the strongest defence. Where discretion exists, decisions should be informed, consistent and documented, balancing legal entitlement against wider commercial risk.

Handled correctly, holiday pay on termination is predictable and manageable. Handled poorly, it remains one of the fastest routes to avoidable legal exposure, cost and employee relations damage.

 

Glossary

 

TermDefinition
Holiday PayPayment made to a worker for statutory or contractual annual leave, calculated to reflect normal remuneration rather than basic pay alone where pay fluctuates.
Statutory Holiday EntitlementThe minimum annual leave entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998, currently 5.6 weeks per leave year, which may include bank and public holidays where the contract provides for this.
Contractual HolidayAnnual leave provided in addition to the statutory minimum, as set out in the employment contract or related policies.
Accrued HolidayHoliday entitlement that has built up during the leave year up to the contractual termination date.
Payment in Lieu of HolidayA payment made on termination of employment to compensate for accrued but untaken statutory annual leave. This is only permitted when employment ends.
Notice PeriodThe period of notice an employer or employee must give to lawfully terminate the employment contract, whether statutory or contractual.
Pay in Lieu of Notice (PILON)A payment made instead of requiring an employee to work their notice period, which may bring the employment contract to an immediate end if permitted by contract.
Garden LeaveA period during notice where the employee remains employed and paid but is not required to attend work or perform duties.
Unlawful Deduction from WagesA claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996 arising where an employer fails to pay wages or makes unauthorised deductions, including unpaid holiday pay.
Irregular Hours WorkerA worker whose paid hours vary from week to week, including zero-hours, casual or bank staff.
Normal RemunerationPay reflecting what a worker normally earns, including regular overtime, commission and allowances where applicable, used for holiday pay calculations.

 

Useful Links

 

ResourceLink
Employment law for businesshttps://www.davidsonmorris.com/employment-law-for-business/
Termination of employment guidancehttps://www.davidsonmorris.com/termination-of-employment/
Holiday pay guidancehttps://www.davidsonmorris.com/holiday-pay/
Unlawful deduction from wageshttps://www.davidsonmorris.com/unlawful-deduction-of-wages/
Irregular hours holiday payhttps://www.davidsonmorris.com/irregular-hours-holiday-pay/
Working Time Regulations 1998https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/1833/contents
Holiday entitlement and pay (GOV.UK)https://www.gov.uk/holiday-entitlement-rights

 

About DavidsonMorris

As employer solutions lawyers, DavidsonMorris offers a complete and cost-effective capability to meet employers’ needs across UK immigration and employment law, HR and global mobility.

Led by Anne Morris, one of the UK’s preeminent immigration lawyers, and with rankings in The Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners, we’re a multi-disciplinary team helping organisations to meet their people objectives, while reducing legal risk and nurturing workforce relations.

Read more about DavidsonMorris here

About our Expert

Picture of Anne Morris

Anne Morris

Founder and Managing Director Anne Morris is a fully qualified solicitor and trusted adviser to large corporates through to SMEs, providing strategic immigration and global mobility advice to support employers with UK operations to meet their workforce needs through corporate immigration.She is recognised by Legal 500 and Chambers as a legal expert and delivers Board-level advice on business migration and compliance risk management as well as overseeing the firm’s development of new client propositions and delivery of cost and time efficient processing of applications.Anne is an active public speaker, immigration commentator, and immigration policy contributor and regularly hosts training sessions for employers and HR professionals.
Picture of Anne Morris

Anne Morris

Founder and Managing Director Anne Morris is a fully qualified solicitor and trusted adviser to large corporates through to SMEs, providing strategic immigration and global mobility advice to support employers with UK operations to meet their workforce needs through corporate immigration.She is recognised by Legal 500 and Chambers as a legal expert and delivers Board-level advice on business migration and compliance risk management as well as overseeing the firm’s development of new client propositions and delivery of cost and time efficient processing of applications.Anne is an active public speaker, immigration commentator, and immigration policy contributor and regularly hosts training sessions for employers and HR professionals.

Legal Disclaimer

The matters contained in this article are intended to be for general information purposes only. This article does not constitute legal advice, nor is it a complete or authoritative statement of the law, and should not be treated as such. Whilst every effort is made to ensure that the information is correct at the time of writing, no warranty, express or implied, is given as to its accuracy and no liability is accepted for any error or omission. Before acting on any of the information contained herein, expert legal advice should be sought.