Employee Accidental Overpayment Salary Guide

Accidental salary overpayments create immediate financial, legal and operational pressure for employers. Whether caused by payroll input errors, incorrect hours, duplicated payments or outdated employee records, an overpayment must be handled carefully to avoid disputes, preserve trust and remain compliant with the Employment Rights Act 1996. Under section 14(1) ERA 1996, employers have a statutory right to recover mistaken payments, but the risk lies in how the recovery is carried out. Poor communication or unlawful deductions expose the business to grievances, reputational damage and potential employment tribunal claims.

What this article is about
This article provides HR directors and business employers with a detailed guide on responding to accidental salary overpayments. It explains the legal framework that governs recovery, the investigative steps employers should take, how to communicate with the employee and the payroll processes required to correct the error. The aim is to ensure employers can recover overpaid sums confidently and lawfully while maintaining fair treatment and minimising operational risk.

Section A: Legal Framework for Salary Overpayments

Accidental overpayments sit at the intersection of payroll administration and statutory employment rights. Employers must understand the legal framework in detail before attempting any recovery. While the law allows an employer to reclaim money paid by mistake, that right is not unlimited. The method of recovery, the clarity of evidence and the proportionality of the approach all determine whether the action is lawful and fair. An accidental overpayment is one of the limited situations where a deduction can be made without written consent, alongside statutory deductions such as tax and National Insurance, contractual deductions and deductions that the employee has agreed to.

1. Statutory Right to Recover Overpayments

The Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) provides employers with a specific exemption to the usual restrictions on wage deductions. Under section 14(1) ERA 1996, employers may lawfully deduct money from a worker’s wages to recover an accidental overpayment. This applies even where the worker has not agreed to the deduction in writing. The rationale is that the employee has been paid money they were not contractually entitled to receive, so the deduction does not fall under ordinary unlawful deduction from wages rules.

However, the existence of a legal right to make a deduction does not remove the employer’s duty to act reasonably. Employers should not impose deductions without warning or without giving the employee a proper explanation. Acting unilaterally can breach trust and confidence, increasing the risk of a grievance, constructive dismissal allegation or breakdown of the employment relationship. Tribunals have held that unreasonable enforcement of a section 14 deduction may still breach the implied term of mutual trust and confidence even where the deduction is technically permitted.

2. When a Deduction Becomes Unlawful

A deduction that is technically permitted under ERA 1996 can still become unlawful or unreasonable in practice if the employer handles the process improperly. Examples include failing to notify the employee, miscalculating the amount, deducting more than necessary or taking the entire amount from a single pay period in a way that leaves the employee without reasonable living funds. If the employee disputes the existence or size of the overpayment, the employer should not proceed with deductions until the dispute is resolved through a clear review process. Otherwise, the employer risks an unlawful deduction claim and may have to repay the money even if an overpayment did occur and may face allegations of breach of trust and confidence.

Where an employee argues that the overpayment had become part of their expected earnings, for example where it continued for several months, tribunals may scrutinise whether the employee could reasonably have known it was an error. If the employer contributed to the misunderstanding through poor pay records or inconsistent communication, this will weigh against the employer when assessing reasonableness and proportionality of the deduction.

3. Employee Defences and Estoppel

Although employers have a statutory right to recover mistaken payments, employees may seek to rely on a defence known as estoppel. This applies where the employee was led to believe the payment was correct, relied on it and would face significant detriment if forced to repay it. Estoppel does not automatically prevent recovery and it does not remove the statutory right under section 14(1), but it can influence how enforceable recovery is in practice, particularly in civil proceedings to recover a debt.

Estoppel is more commonly considered in the context of civil recovery in the courts rather than employment tribunal proceedings, but it should still influence employer decision-making. It is most relevant where the error continued for a long period, where the employee queried the payment and was told it was correct or where the employer’s negligence contributed to the confusion. Employers should assess whether any estoppel arguments might arise before initiating recovery and factor this into their approach and repayment proposals. The longer the overpayment has persisted, the more important it is that the employer demonstrates transparency, accurate calculations and a fair approach to repayment.

Section Summary

The law gives employers a clear right to recover accidental salary overpayments, but the manner of recovery must remain lawful and reasonable. Heavy-handed deductions or poor communication can expose the business to unnecessary legal and employee relations risk. Employers should therefore anchor their approach in section 14(1) ERA 1996 while taking account of fairness, proportionality and any potential estoppel issues, and ensure that no deductions are made while a genuine dispute remains unresolved.

Section B: Identifying and Investigating an Overpayment

Before an employer contacts the employee or initiates any deduction, they must first be certain an overpayment has occurred. Payroll inaccuracies are common in fast-moving or complex workforces and a premature assumption of error can undermine trust. A structured investigation enables employers to verify the facts, identify the cause and calculate the precise amount owed. This also ensures that any action taken aligns with statutory requirements and internal HR policies.

1. Payroll Controls and Detection

Overpayments typically arise from data entry mistakes, incorrect pay codes, misreported hours or changes in employment status that were not updated in time. Employers should maintain robust payroll controls that allow these anomalies to be detected quickly. This includes routine reconciliation checks, variance analysis between pay periods, audit trails for manual adjustments and clear communication channels between HR and payroll teams to ensure timely updates when employees join, leave or change role.

Detection should not rely solely on employee self-reporting. While many employees do highlight discrepancies, the employer remains responsible for accurate payroll administration. Systems that automatically flag unusual payments or deviations from contracted salary help reduce the likelihood of significant or repeated errors.

2. Internal Investigation Steps

Once an anomaly is identified, the employer should verify that the payment constitutes a genuine overpayment rather than a late adjustment, bonus or previously agreed entitlement. This involves reviewing the employee’s contract, recent variations, timesheets, overtime records and any relevant manager approvals. Payroll teams should document every step of this process, including calculations and source data, to ensure transparency and avoid disputes.

Employers must also identify the cause of the error. A one-off manual input mistake requires a different response to a systemic fault or recurring process failure. Establishing the cause helps determine whether internal policies need refinement or whether wider payroll training is required.

Before confirming any final figure, employers should also establish whether the recovery should be made on a net or gross basis, depending on timing within the tax year and HMRC rules on correcting payroll errors.

3. Assessing Size, Timescale and Employee Impact

The scale and duration of the overpayment significantly affect how employers should approach repayment. A small, one-off overpayment may be corrected in the next payroll cycle with minimal impact on the employee. A larger or long-running overpayment, however, may cause significant employee hardship if recovered in a single deduction.

Employers should assess whether the repayment proposal is proportionate and sustainable for the employee. This includes considering the employee’s pay frequency, existing deductions and any personal circumstances the employee highlights once notified. Employers should proactively invite employees to raise affordability concerns so repayments can be structured reasonably. Failing to consider impact may not breach the strict legal right to deduct, but it often leads to grievances and relationship damage that reasonable employers should avoid.

Section Summary

A careful investigation ensures that employers act on accurate information and follow a fair process. Clear evidence, transparent calculations and a documented review form the foundation for lawful and proportionate recovery. Employers who take time to identify the cause, establish net or gross repayment requirements and assess the impact on the employee reduce the risk of dispute and maintain confidence in payroll accuracy.

Section C: Communicating with the Employee

Once the investigation confirms the overpayment and the employer understands its scale and cause, the next step is to speak with the employee. Clear and respectful communication is critical. Even though the employer has a statutory right to recover the money, the employee may feel confused, anxious or unfairly blamed. A well-managed conversation reduces friction, builds cooperation and significantly lowers the risk of formal disputes.

1. How to Notify the Employee Professionally

Employers should inform the employee promptly and factually. The notification should explain how the overpayment occurred, the exact amount involved, the period it covers and the evidence supporting the calculation. Written confirmation should follow any initial discussion so both parties have a clear record. Employers should avoid language that implies employee wrongdoing unless there is separate evidence of misconduct; overpayments are usually administrative issues rather than disciplinary matters.

The tone should be objective and supportive. Many employees worry that an overpayment might have tax implications or affect their future salary. Providing reassurance, clarity and guidance at this stage helps maintain trust.

2. Agreeing a Repayment Plan

Although employers can legally deduct the full amount from the next payroll cycle, this is rarely the appropriate approach unless the overpayment is small. HR teams should discuss repayment options that protect the employee from financial hardship while allowing the employer to recover the full balance.

Repayment plans may include instalments over several pay periods, a revised deduction schedule aligned with the employee’s earnings or repayment outside payroll where the employee prefers to transfer funds directly. Employers should ensure any agreement is documented in writing to avoid future dispute. Transparency around whether adjustments will be made on a gross or net basis is also important, as tax and National Insurance corrections may affect the final amount.

3. Handling Disputes or Refusal to Repay

Employees may challenge the calculations, dispute the period covered or argue that the payment formed part of their expected earnings. The employer should respond proportionately by pausing deductions until the dispute is reviewed and resolved. This includes providing the employee with all relevant records and offering an opportunity to present evidence or raise concerns.

Where an employee refuses repayment entirely, the employer must avoid pressure tactics. Instead, they should reaffirm the statutory right to recover the amount, maintain accurate documentation and escalate through the appropriate internal process such as grievance procedures. Employers should weigh the cost, practicalities and employee relations impact before taking any civil recovery action. Recovering an overpayment does not breach National Minimum Wage rules, even if the deduction reduces take-home pay below NMW levels for that period.

Section Summary

Open and objective communication is the cornerstone of successful recovery. Employers who notify employees promptly, explain the facts clearly and offer reasonable repayment options minimise legal and HR risk. A structured, fair approach also helps resolve disagreements before they escalate, preserving the employment relationship wherever possible.

Section D: Payroll Corrections and Recovery Methods

Once the employee has been informed and repayment terms have been discussed, the employer must correct payroll records accurately and ensure any recovery method complies with statutory rules. Payroll adjustments must reflect the true contractual entitlement for the relevant pay periods, with clear documentation of the original error, the corrected amount and the repayment schedule. Errors in this stage can cause further overpayments, underpayments or tax discrepancies, adding unnecessary complexity and risk.

1. Making a Lawful Deduction

The statutory right under the Employment Rights Act 1996 allows employers to deduct the value of the overpayment directly from wages. However, deductions must still be calculated with precision and applied through correct payroll mechanisms. Employers should avoid taking the entire amount from a single pay period unless the overpayment is small or the employee has explicitly agreed to this approach. Excessive deductions can cause immediate financial difficulty and may be viewed as unreasonable, even if they remain technically lawful.

Deductions should be itemised clearly on the employee’s payslip, showing the amount recovered, the period to which it relates and any tax adjustments made. Transparent records protect both parties and ensure compliance if the recovery is later questioned.

2. Alternative Repayment Methods

Where deductions from salary are impractical or risk causing hardship, employers may agree repayment outside payroll. This might include the employee transferring funds via bank payment, making instalments over an agreed period or repaying the balance in full when they are able. Employers should document any such arrangement in writing, confirming amounts, dates and whether interest will be applied, although interest is rarely used for employment-related overpayments.

Repayment from final salary is common where an employee leaves the business before full recovery. Employers may deduct the outstanding amount from the final payslip provided it relates solely to the overpayment. If the final salary is insufficient, employers may request repayment directly from the former employee. Where repayment is refused, civil recovery is possible, but employers must weigh proportionality, cost and reputational impact before escalating to litigation.

3. HMRC and Tax Considerations

Correcting an overpayment may require payroll teams to adjust tax and National Insurance calculations for the relevant pay periods. In many cases, the simplest approach is to recover the net amount from the employee while adjusting payroll records so HMRC receives accurate year-to-date information. This avoids the need for the employee to reclaim tax directly from HMRC, which can otherwise add delay and complexity.

If recovery occurs after the end of the tax year, or where the employee has left employment, payroll teams may need to recover the gross amount and make a corrected RTI submission. Payroll must ensure P45 and final FPS submissions reflect the corrected earnings. Failure to do so can cause issues for the employee with HMRC, including incorrect tax coding or discrepancies in personal tax records.

Section Summary

Payroll correction is a technical stage that must be handled carefully to ensure compliance and accuracy. Employers must apply deductions lawfully, maintain transparent records and ensure tax and National Insurance adjustments are correct. A methodical approach protects the business, preserves trust and ensures the recovery is completed without causing further error.

FAQs

Can an employer force repayment of an accidental salary overpayment?
Yes. Employers have a statutory right under the Employment Rights Act 1996, section 14(1), to recover accidental overpayments. However, the method of recovery must be reasonable, clearly explained and supported by accurate calculations.

What if the employee has already spent the overpaid money?
The employee is still legally required to repay it. Spending the money does not remove the employer’s right to recover the overpayment, although employers should offer a realistic repayment plan if the amount is large or longstanding.

Can an employer deduct the full amount from one payslip?
Legally yes, but it is often unreasonable in practice unless the overpayment is small. Large deductions may create financial hardship and increase the risk of grievances. Instalment plans are usually the better approach.

What if the employee disputes the overpayment?
Employers should pause recovery until the dispute is reviewed. This includes providing the employee with evidence, checking calculations and following internal grievance processes where necessary.

What if the employee has left the business?
Employers may recover the amount from the final salary if sufficient funds are available. Otherwise, they can request repayment directly. Civil recovery is possible but should be considered carefully, weighing cost and proportionality.

Does recovery of an overpayment breach National Minimum Wage rules?
No. Recovering an overpayment does not breach NMW legislation, even if the deduction reduces take-home pay below NMW levels for the relevant pay period.

Conclusion

Accidental salary overpayments place employers in a situation that demands both legal certainty and practical judgement. While the Employment Rights Act 1996 gives employers a clear right to recover mistaken payments, the outcome depends heavily on how the recovery process is managed. A rushed deduction, a poorly explained calculation or a failure to consider the employee’s circumstances can turn an administrative correction into an employee relations problem.

Employers who follow a structured approach minimise this risk. This means confirming the error through careful payroll investigation, providing transparent evidence, engaging with the employee constructively and agreeing repayment terms that are fair and sustainable. Payroll teams should then correct salary records and tax submissions accurately to ensure HMRC receives the correct information and the employee’s tax profile remains accurate.

Treating overpayment recovery as both a legal and people-management issue protects the employer’s position while maintaining trust within the workforce. Clear communication, proportionate action and accurate payroll correction are the foundations of a compliant and efficient process.

Glossary

Useful Links