Gender Pay Gap Reporting 2026: Requirements & How to Comply

Gender pay gap reporting is no longer a niche HR disclosure exercise. For employers in scope of the UK gender pay gap reporting regime, it is a repeatable annual compliance obligation with real commercial consequences if it is mishandled. The legal duty is to calculate and publish prescribed figures on time and in the correct form. But the employer’s risk sits wider than the regulations: late, inaccurate or poorly contextualised reporting can drive reputational damage, employee relations issues, recruitment friction, investor questions and, in some cases, can surface equal pay or discrimination risks that require separate legal handling.

What this article is about: this guide explains what UK gender pay gap reporting legally requires, which employers must report and when, what must be reported and how, how enforcement works, what the commercial consequences of non-compliance look like in practice and what decisions HR and leadership teams should take to keep reporting defensible, accurate and proportionate. It should be read alongside wider UK employment law compliance obligations where pay governance, employee relations and dispute risk intersect.

Section A: What is gender pay gap reporting and why does it matter to employers?

Gender pay gap reporting is a statutory transparency regime. It requires certain employers to publish a set of prescribed calculations showing pay and bonus differences between male and female employees. It does not, by itself, require an employer to “fix” a gap or prove discrimination. The point for employers is that the figures are public, comparable year-on-year and easy for third parties to interpret (and misinterpret). That means compliance is not just about producing numbers. It is also about governance, data integrity, communication discipline and anticipating how the figures could be used by employees, unions, customers, investors, bidders, journalists and litigants.

1. What is gender pay gap reporting under UK law?

In legal terms, gender pay gap reporting is the obligation on in-scope employers to calculate and publish specific gender pay gap metrics annually using a defined “snapshot date” and prescribed methods. The figures focus on hourly pay and bonuses and include pay quartile distribution. The reporting requirement is triggered by headcount on the snapshot date and is repeated each reporting year where the employer remains in scope.

What the law requires

• Employers in scope must calculate the prescribed measures using the statutory definitions of pay, bonus pay and relevant employees.
• Employers must publish the results in the required format, on time and in a publicly accessible way, and submit them to the government reporting service.
• For most private and voluntary sector employers, a written statement signed by an appropriate senior person is required to confirm the accuracy of the published figures. A narrative and action plan are not mandated by the regulations (although commonly used).

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide who owns the reporting process internally: HR, reward, payroll, finance, legal, or a joint governance model.
• Decide how to define and quality-check the underlying payroll dataset and employee population for reporting purposes (especially where you have atypical worker populations, variable pay, allowances or complex bonus arrangements).
• Decide the level of disclosure beyond the legal minimum (for example, whether to publish a narrative, action plan and additional breakdowns) and who signs this off.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Late or incorrect reporting can trigger regulatory engagement and enforcement, reputational damage and commercial fallout (particularly in recruitment, procurement and employee relations).
• Poor-quality reporting can create avoidable equal pay risk if the organisation uses the wrong language, makes casual admissions, or publishes commentary that suggests unlawful pay practices when the actual issue is structural representation.

A key point for employers is that the reporting regime is formulaic. The “numbers” do not explain causation. Organisations with entirely non-discriminatory pay practices can still show significant gender pay gaps due to workforce composition, occupational segregation, seniority distribution, part-time patterns and bonus structures. Your governance approach should be designed to produce accurate figures and communicate them without creating additional legal exposure.

2. Gender pay gap vs equal pay: what employers commonly confuse

This is the single most important conceptual distinction to get right, because it drives how you manage internal risk once the figures are known.

Equal pay is a legal right enforceable through claims, and it is rooted in the Equality Act 2010. It is about whether men and women are receiving the same contractual pay and benefits for the same work, like work, work rated as equivalent, or work of equal value. If an employer cannot justify a difference by a material factor not tainted by sex discrimination, it may be unlawful. For a deeper legal overview, see equal pay law and the mechanics of an equal pay claim.

On the other hand, the gender pay gap is a statistical comparison of average pay across the workforce. It does not compare individuals doing the same work. It compares average hourly pay and bonuses across male and female populations within the organisation.

Gender pay gap reporting does not assess whether men and women are paid equally for the same work and does not, by itself, establish liability under equal pay law.

What the law requires

• Equal pay compliance is an ongoing legal obligation. Gender pay gap reporting is a periodic statutory reporting duty for employers in scope.

What the employer must decide or do

• Treat gender pay gap reporting as a compliance project with legal oversight, but do not treat it as an admission of unlawful pay practice.
• Build a decision pathway: if the reported gap is large or volatile, decide whether you need a deeper diagnostic exercise to test whether the organisation has an equal pay vulnerability (for example, inconsistent starting salaries, discretion-driven pay progression, bonus eligibility rules, market supplements, allowances, or legacy arrangements).

What happens if you get it wrong

• If you present gender pay gap figures as “proof” of unequal pay, you create unnecessary legal and employee relations risk.
• If you ignore gender pay gap signals that point to discretionary pay practices, you can drift into equal pay and discrimination exposure that becomes harder to manage once an employee challenge arises.

Employers often make two opposite mistakes. The first is denial: “a gap doesn’t matter because it’s not illegal.” That is commercially naïve, because stakeholders increasingly treat a significant gap as a governance issue. The second is overcorrection: treating the gap as if it automatically means equal pay breaches. That can lead to rushed changes, poor communications and ill-judged commitments that create contractual or discrimination complications.

The better approach is disciplined: understand what the regime measures, comply with the reporting rules and use the reporting output as one lens in a wider reward, progression and workforce planning strategy. Where concerns arise, employers should distinguish between reporting risk and potential employment discrimination exposure, including the risk of direct discrimination claims where decision-making is not properly governed.

3. Why gender pay gap reporting is a board-level risk issue

For many employers, the most material impact of gender pay gap reporting is not legal enforcement. It is commercial and reputational exposure and the internal management load that follows publication.

Reputational risk and employer brand

The figures are public, easy to compare and frequently picked up in recruitment conversations, staff forums and media commentary. Employers with large gaps may face a narrative that they are “unfair” or “behind the curve,” even where the gap is structural and not about unequal pay. That affects retention, attraction and morale, especially where you are competing for talent.

Procurement, ESG and client scrutiny

Many larger customers, public sector bodies and regulated entities assess workforce diversity metrics in procurement and due diligence. Gender pay figures can appear in tender questions, contract renewals, supplier onboarding and ESG reporting. Even when not a formal requirement, they can shape risk scoring and confidence in management.

Workforce relations and grievance risk

Once figures are published, employee questions often follow, particularly if the numbers move year to year or if there is a large bonus gap. Poor internal communication can create a sense of unfairness, which can trigger grievances, collective engagement or union attention. Where there is already tension in the workplace, the reporting moment can become a focal point.

Litigation adjacency

Gender pay gap reporting itself does not create liability for unequal pay, but it can influence perceptions and prompt employees to ask questions about pay setting and progression. If your organisation has weak pay governance, inconsistent reward practices or insufficient documentation, reporting can increase the likelihood of challenge.

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide whether reporting sits under HR alone or under a broader governance model with legal, payroll and leadership oversight.
• Decide the internal line on narrative: factual, cautious, consistent across years and aligned with what you can evidence.
• Decide whether you need additional internal review work before publication, particularly if you anticipate questions about bonuses, progression, recruitment pipelines, part-time patterns, or leadership representation.

What happens if you get it wrong

• You end up managing a preventable crisis: late reporting, inaccurate reporting, inconsistencies between internal and external messaging, or statements that create evidential problems later.

For HR professionals and business owners, the practical reality is simple: gender pay gap reporting is now a predictable annual compliance event. Your organisation should treat it like any other repeatable regulatory obligation: clear accountability, tested data processes, documented checks, controlled communications and proportionate follow-up actions.

Section A summary

Gender pay gap reporting is a statutory transparency duty, not a legal requirement to eliminate a gap. The compliance task is calculating and publishing prescribed measures correctly and on time, but the risk is broader: reputation, procurement, employee relations and the potential for equal pay scrutiny if underlying reward governance is weak. The key employer decision is to run reporting as a controlled governance process, with disciplined communication that distinguishes statistical gaps from unlawful pay differences and that avoids creating unnecessary legal exposure.

Section B: Which employers must report gender pay gap data and when?

For employers, the first compliance decision is whether the reporting duty applies at all in a given year. This is not always as straightforward as counting permanent staff, and mistakes at this stage are common, particularly in organisations with group structures, atypical worker populations or fluctuating headcount.

1. Which organisations are legally required to report?

Under the UK gender pay gap reporting regime, the duty to report applies to employers with 250 or more relevant employees on the applicable snapshot date.

The concept of “relevant employees” is defined by the regulations and is wider than many employers assume. It generally includes employees, workers and apprentices within scope, and can extend to individuals whose status depends on employment status analysis and whether they are engaged personally to perform work where UK employment law applies.

This means that some individuals who are not traditional permanent employees may still count towards the 250-employee threshold if they fall within the statutory definition and are captured by the relevant pay data.

What the law requires

• Employers must assess headcount on the snapshot date each year.
• If the employer has 250 or more relevant employees on that date, it must report for that reporting year.

What the employer must decide or do

• Identify the legal employing entity or entities. Gender pay gap reporting is assessed per legal employer, not automatically across a group.
• Determine which categories of worker fall within the definition of “relevant employees” for your organisation, including any categories that sit in grey areas and require status analysis.
• Confirm whether any overseas workers should be included, which will usually turn on whether UK employment law applies and the employee has a sufficient connection to Great Britain.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Failing to report when required exposes the organisation to enforcement action and reputational risk.
• Reporting when not required can also create unnecessary scrutiny, particularly if figures fluctuate significantly year to year.

Group structures often create confusion. A parent company does not automatically report for its subsidiaries unless it is the legal employer. Equally, employers sometimes aggregate headcount across entities when they are not legally required to do so, or fail to recognise that a single employing entity has crossed the threshold due to growth, acquisition or seasonal workforce changes. Where group issues arise, employers should be clear on the legal employer and any relevant group company arrangements before finalising scope.

2. Snapshot dates and reporting deadlines employers must meet

Gender pay gap reporting operates on a fixed annual cycle built around a snapshot date. The snapshot date determines both who counts as an employee and which pay data is captured for reporting purposes.

There are two snapshot dates, depending on the type of employer:

• Private, voluntary and most public sector employers: 5 April
• Most public authority employers: 31 March

The reporting deadline is 12 months after the snapshot date.

This means:

• Employers using a 5 April snapshot date must publish their report by 4 April the following year.
• Employers using a 31 March snapshot date must publish their report by 30 March the following year.

What the law requires

• Employee headcount and pay data must be captured on the snapshot date.
• Reports must be published and submitted to the government gender pay gap service within 12 months.

What the employer must decide or do

• Plan backwards from the deadline, allowing time for data validation, internal review and senior sign-off.
• Align internal payroll and HR timelines so that the correct pay period is used for the snapshot calculations.
• Decide who is responsible for monitoring deadlines and submission confirmation.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Late publication is visible to the public and to regulators.
• The government service applies a publicly visible “late” status to non-compliant employers.
• Late reporting increases the likelihood of regulatory engagement and negative external commentary.

A common mistake is underestimating how long internal validation and approval can take, particularly in larger organisations or where the figures raise internal concern.

3. What happens if headcount drops below 250?

An employer is only required to report if it has 250 or more relevant employees on the snapshot date for that reporting year.

If headcount drops below 250 on the snapshot date:

• There is no legal obligation to publish a report for that year.
• The employer may still choose to report voluntarily, but this is a strategic decision rather than a compliance requirement.

What the law requires

• No reporting obligation applies for that year if the threshold is not met.

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide whether to report voluntarily for consistency or stakeholder expectations.
• Consider how voluntary reporting might be interpreted if figures change significantly or if reporting stops and starts across years.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Voluntary reporting can create unnecessary reputational exposure or internal confusion if not clearly explained.
• Inconsistent reporting across years can raise questions from employees, unions or clients.

4. Public sector versus private sector obligations

There are two sets of regulations governing gender pay gap reporting:

• One applying to most private and voluntary sector employers
• One applying to most public authority employers

The core reporting requirements are broadly similar, but there are differences that matter for compliance.

Written statement requirements

Most private and voluntary sector employers must include a written statement confirming the accuracy of the data, signed by an appropriate senior person. Public authorities listed in Schedule 19 to the Equality Act 2010 are not required to provide a written statement, although they may choose to do so voluntarily.

The identity of the “appropriate senior person” depends on the legal structure of the employer. A corporate body (other than a limited liability partnership) will need a director, an LLP will require a designated member, a limited partnership will need a general partner, any other type of partnership will require a partner, for an unincorporated body of persons (other than a partnership) it will be a member of the governing body or senior officer, and for any other type of body it will be the most senior employee.

What the employer must decide or do

• Confirm which regulatory regime applies to the organisation.
• Identify the correct senior signatory and ensure they understand the legal significance of the confirmation.
• Decide whether to publish additional narrative or explanation beyond the statutory minimum.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Missing or invalid sign-off can render the report non-compliant.
• Inaccurate or poorly worded confirmation statements can create personal and organisational risk.

Section B summary

The duty to report gender pay gap data depends on headcount, snapshot date and the legal identity of the employer. Errors commonly arise from misunderstanding who counts as a relevant employee, how group structures operate, or when the reporting obligation is triggered. Employers should assess applicability annually, plan reporting well in advance of the deadline and ensure that accountability for compliance is clearly assigned to avoid late, incorrect or unnecessary reporting.

Section C: What exactly must be reported under gender pay gap reporting rules?

Once an employer is in scope, compliance turns on getting the content of the report right. The regulations are prescriptive about what must be calculated and published, and they leave little room for interpretation. Errors at this stage are common, particularly where payroll structures are complex or where employers apply equal pay concepts to what is, in law, a statistical reporting exercise.

1. The six statutory gender pay gap measures employers must publish

Employers in scope must calculate and publish six specific measures each reporting year. These measures are fixed by the regulations and must be calculated using the statutory methodology.

The six measures are:

• Mean gender pay gap in hourly pay
  The difference between the average hourly pay of male and female full-pay relevant employees, expressed as a percentage of male pay.
• Median gender pay gap in hourly pay
  The difference between the midpoint hourly pay of male and female full-pay relevant employees, expressed as a percentage of male pay.
• Mean bonus gender pay gap
  The difference between the average bonus paid to male and female relevant employees over the 12-month bonus period.
• Median bonus gender pay gap
  The difference between the midpoint bonus paid to male and female relevant employees over the 12-month bonus period.
• Proportion of males and females receiving a bonus
  The percentage of male and female relevant employees who received any bonus pay during the bonus period.
• Proportion of males and females in each pay quartile
  The distribution of male and female full-pay relevant employees across four equal-sized pay bands, ranked by hourly pay.

What the law requires

• All six measures must be calculated and published.
• The statutory methodology must be followed without adjustment.
• Figures must be expressed in the prescribed format.

What the employer must decide or do

• Ensure the correct employee populations are used for each measure.
• Validate calculations carefully, particularly where bonus structures are complex or discretionary.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Incomplete or incorrect reporting places the employer in breach of the regulations.
• Correcting published figures later can attract additional scrutiny and undermine confidence in governance.

2. What counts as “pay” and what is excluded?

One of the most frequent sources of error in gender pay gap reporting is misunderstanding what counts as pay for reporting purposes. The statutory definitions do not always align with how pay is defined for contractual or tax purposes.

Included in hourly pay calculations:

• Basic pay
• Paid leave
• Shift premium pay
• Allowances
• Pay for piecework

Excluded from hourly pay calculations:

• Overtime pay
• Redundancy pay
• Expenses
• Benefits in kind

Bonus pay is reported separately and includes commission, productivity bonuses, profit-sharing payments and long-term incentive awards. Employers should pay particular attention to how bonus pay and variable reward schemes are treated, especially where eligibility or timing differs across the workforce.

What the law requires

• Statutory definitions must be applied even where they differ from internal payroll categories.
• Overtime must be excluded from hourly pay calculations.

What the employer must decide or do

• Map payroll codes and allowances to the statutory definitions.
• Ensure consistent treatment of allowances, premiums and commission.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Misclassification can materially distort the reported figures.
• Errors may require republication and increase regulatory scrutiny.

3. Who counts as a “full-pay relevant employee”?

Hourly pay and pay quartile calculations are based on full-pay relevant employees only. This excludes employees who were not paid their usual full pay during the pay period that includes the snapshot date.

Employees are excluded from hourly pay calculations if they were receiving reduced pay due to leave, including maternity, paternity, adoption, shared parental or sick leave.

They may still be included in bonus calculations if a bonus was paid during the relevant bonus period.

What the law requires

• Full-pay status must be assessed for the snapshot pay period.
• Excluded employees must not be included in hourly pay or quartile calculations.

What the employer must decide or do

• Identify employees on reduced pay during the snapshot period.
• Ensure payroll systems correctly flag full-pay and reduced-pay status.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Including employees on reduced pay can skew reported gaps.
• Incorrect quartile placement undermines confidence in the data.

4. Data accuracy risks and common employer mistakes

Even where employers understand the legal definitions, errors often arise from data handling rather than interpretation.

Common risk areas include:

• Using the wrong pay period for the snapshot date
• Inconsistent treatment of allowances
• Incorrect bonus period selection
• Manual spreadsheet errors

Payroll errors can have knock-on effects across reporting and wider reward governance. Employers should be alert to underlying payroll errors that may distort figures.

What the law requires

• Accurate calculation and publication of the prescribed measures.

What the employer must decide or do

• Build internal checks and cross-verification between HR, payroll and finance.
• Maintain an audit trail explaining how figures were calculated.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Regulatory engagement and reputational damage.
• Loss of trust in pay and reporting governance.

Section C summary

Gender pay gap reporting is a technical compliance exercise governed by fixed statutory measures and definitions. Employers must publish all six prescribed figures using the correct employee populations and pay definitions. Most compliance failures arise from data handling errors rather than misunderstandings of the law, making robust validation and clear internal ownership essential.

Section D: What are the legal and commercial consequences of getting gender pay gap reporting wrong?

Gender pay gap reporting is not enforced in the same way as many other employment law obligations. There are no automatic fines for non-compliance, and there is no requirement to eliminate a gender pay gap. That does not mean the risks are low. The consequences of late, inaccurate or poorly handled reporting are often indirect, but they can be serious and long-lasting for employers.

1. Is gender pay gap reporting legally enforceable?

Yes. Gender pay gap reporting is a statutory obligation for employers in scope, and failure to comply is a breach of the regulations.

However, it is important to understand what is, and is not, being enforced.

What the law enforces

• Whether the employer has published the required information
• Whether it has done so within the statutory timeframe
• Whether the published information meets the prescribed requirements

What the law does not enforce

• Whether the employer has a gender pay gap
• Whether the employer has taken steps to reduce that gap
• Whether the gap is acceptable in size or trend

What the employer must decide or do

• Treat reporting as a compliance obligation, not a voluntary disclosure exercise.
• Ensure there is a documented process showing how compliance has been achieved.

What happens if you get it wrong

• The employer may be treated as having breached a statutory duty, triggering regulatory engagement.

This distinction matters. Employers sometimes assume that because there is no fine attached to the figures themselves, enforcement is weak. In reality, enforcement operates through reputational pressure, formal regulatory action and escalation mechanisms that can be more damaging than a fixed penalty.

2. The role of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC)

The Equality and Human Rights Commission is responsible for enforcing gender pay gap reporting obligations in England, Scotland and Wales.

The EHRC’s approach is typically graduated rather than immediate and may include informal engagement, formal investigation and escalation where non-compliance persists. Employers should understand the EHRC’s wider role in workplace discrimination enforcement when assessing overall exposure.

What the law requires

• Employers must cooperate with lawful EHRC requests relating to gender pay gap reporting.
• Employers must comply with court orders made following EHRC enforcement action.

What the employer must decide or do

• Respond promptly and accurately to EHRC correspondence.
• Ensure any remedial steps, such as late publication, are properly authorised and fact-checked.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Failure to comply with a court order can result in unlimited fines.
• Public enforcement action can damage reputation and stakeholder confidence.

Employers should be aware that the EHRC publicly identifies non-compliant organisations, which can amplify reputational exposure even where no further legal sanctions are applied.

3. Reputational, workforce and commercial risks

For most employers, the most immediate impact of non-compliance is reputational rather than regulatory.

Reputational exposure

Late or missing reports are publicly visible. Journalists, campaign groups and competitors can access and compare data. Poor compliance can undermine employer brand and wider trust, particularly where organisations publicly promote equality or ESG commitments.

Workforce relations

Published figures frequently prompt employee questions about fairness, progression and reward. If mishandled, these issues can escalate into workplace grievances, collective engagement or union involvement.

Commercial and procurement risk

Gender pay gap data is increasingly considered in procurement, tendering and due diligence processes. Non-compliance or poorly explained figures may affect contract awards, investor confidence and regulatory relationships.

What the employer must decide or do

• Anticipate stakeholder reaction and prepare internal communications before publication.
• Ensure external messaging aligns with internal explanations.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Employers may find themselves managing a reputational issue rather than a compliance task.

4. Indirect legal risks employers often overlook

Although gender pay gap reporting does not itself create liability for unequal pay, it can act as a catalyst for wider legal risk.

Gender pay gap reporting does not assess whether men and women are paid equally for the same work and does not, by itself, establish liability under equal pay law. However, published data may prompt employees to question pay practices, particularly where gaps are large or widening.

Equal pay and discrimination claims

Employees may use published data to support questions or challenges that develop into employment tribunal claims if pay differences cannot be objectively justified.

Grievances and whistleblowing

Reporting can trigger internal complaints. If mishandled, these may escalate into formal disputes or protected disclosures.

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide whether reported figures justify a deeper, legally privileged review of pay practices.
• Brief managers on how to respond consistently and lawfully to employee questions.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Casual admissions or poorly framed explanations can be relied on in later disputes.
• Failure to address genuine issues may compound legal and reputational risk over time.

Section D summary

Gender pay gap reporting is a legally enforceable transparency obligation with significant indirect consequences. Non-compliance exposes employers to regulatory engagement, reputational damage, workforce relations issues and increased scrutiny of pay practices. The key risk management task is ensuring accurate, timely reporting and disciplined communication that does not create unnecessary legal exposure.

Section E: How employers should approach gender pay gap reporting strategically

Once employers understand what the law requires and the risks of non-compliance, the next issue is how gender pay gap reporting should be handled in practice. For most organisations, this is not simply a technical reporting task. It is a strategic decision about governance, risk appetite and how pay transparency is managed across the business.

1. What the law requires versus what best practice demands

The legal obligation is narrow. Employers in scope must calculate and publish the prescribed figures on time, using the statutory methodology, and provide a written confirmation statement where required. There is no legal requirement to explain the figures, publish an action plan or demonstrate progress over time.

Best practice often goes further, but it is not mandatory.

What the law requires

• Publication of the six statutory gender pay gap measures.
• Submission of the data via the government reporting service.
• A signed confirmation statement for most private and voluntary sector employers.

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide whether to publish a narrative explaining the figures.
• Decide whether to publish voluntary commitments or targets.
• Decide how gender pay gap reporting fits within wider HR compliance and governance frameworks.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Overstating obligations or implying legal fault can increase employee relations and litigation risk.
• Publishing commitments without the ability to deliver can undermine credibility and trust.

Employers should be clear internally that best practice is discretionary. The decision to go beyond the statutory minimum should be deliberate and aligned with the organisation’s overall risk and governance approach.

2. Should employers publish a supporting narrative?

A supporting narrative is not required by law, but many employers choose to publish one to provide context and manage interpretation of the figures.

A well-drafted narrative can:

• Explain structural or workforce factors behind the reported gap.
• Reinforce the distinction between gender pay gap reporting and equal pay.
• Reduce the risk of misinterpretation by employees, candidates and external stakeholders.

However, narratives also create risk if they are poorly framed.

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide whether a narrative is necessary given the size, direction and volatility of the gap.
• Ensure any narrative is factual, cautious and evidence-based.
• Involve legal or senior HR oversight where figures are sensitive or complex.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Statements suggesting women are paid less for the same work may be relied on in later disputes.
• Inconsistent explanations across reporting years can undermine trust.

The safest narratives explain what the figures show, why the organisation believes they look that way and what, if anything, the employer is considering doing, without admitting fault or creating binding commitments.

3. Action plans: voluntary, but not risk-free

Publishing an action plan is entirely voluntary. While action plans can demonstrate commitment, they should not be treated as a default response to a reported gender pay gap.

Potential benefits

• Signals leadership engagement and accountability.
• Supports employer brand and recruitment messaging.
• Aligns gender pay gap reporting with wider ESG and workforce governance objectives.

Potential risks

• Targets may be treated as promises by employees or unions.
• Failure to meet published commitments can attract criticism.
• Reactive pay adjustments may create equal pay or discrimination risk.

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide whether an action plan aligns with organisational strategy and capacity.
• Ensure any targets are realistic, measurable and time-bound.
• Avoid commitments that could be construed as guarantees.

4. Using gender pay gap data to manage workforce risk

Gender pay gap data should be used as a diagnostic tool rather than a compliance endpoint.

Recruitment and progression

Persistent gaps often reflect underrepresentation at senior levels. Employers may need to review recruitment pipelines, promotion criteria and development opportunities rather than pay rates alone.

Bonus design and eligibility

Significant bonus gaps may indicate eligibility rules, performance assessment processes or discretionary decision-making that warrant review.

Flexible working and retention

Patterns of part-time work and career breaks can influence pay distribution. Employers should assess whether flexible working policies support progression or unintentionally limit advancement.

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide whether internal diagnostics are required beyond the published figures.
• Separate statistical reporting from legal equal pay analysis.
• Ensure findings are used constructively within wider HR strategy.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Ignoring structural drivers can allow risk to compound over time.
• Poorly targeted interventions can create new legal or operational problems.

Section E summary

Strategic handling of gender pay gap reporting requires clarity about what the law mandates and what is optional. Narratives and action plans can support governance and reputation, but only where they are carefully framed and aligned with organisational capacity. Employers should adopt a measured, evidence-based approach that supports compliance while avoiding unnecessary legal exposure.

Section F: Step-by-step employer process for gender pay gap reporting

For most employers, the practical challenge of gender pay gap reporting lies not in understanding the regulations but in executing the process consistently, accurately and defensibly each year. A robust process should be repeatable, auditable and clearly owned, reflecting that reporting is a standing compliance obligation rather than a one-off HR task.

1. Preparing internally before the snapshot date

Effective reporting begins well before the snapshot date. Employers that wait until after the snapshot often discover data gaps or classification issues that are difficult to resolve without increasing risk.

What the law requires

• Employee headcount and pay data must be assessed as at the relevant snapshot date.
• The snapshot date determines which employees are included and which pay period is used for calculations.

What the employer must decide or do

• Appoint clear ownership for the reporting process, typically involving HR, payroll and finance, with legal oversight where appropriate.
• Confirm the correct snapshot date and ensure payroll cut-off dates align with it.
• Identify worker categories that may present classification issues, such as atypical workers, casual staff, secondees or overseas employees.
• Review bonus schemes and variable pay arrangements to understand how they will feed into the reporting calculations.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Misaligned payroll data can invalidate calculations.
• Late identification of scope issues can force rushed decisions that increase error and compliance risk.

Employers with complex workforce structures should document inclusion and exclusion decisions so that approaches remain consistent and defensible across reporting years.

2. Calculating and validating the figures

Once the snapshot date has passed, the focus shifts to calculation and validation. This is the stage at which most technical errors occur.

What the law requires

• All six statutory measures must be calculated using the prescribed methodology.
• Only full-pay relevant employees must be included in hourly pay and quartile calculations.

What the employer must decide or do

• Extract payroll and bonus data for the relevant periods and reconcile this against headcount records.
• Identify employees on reduced pay during the snapshot pay period and exclude them from hourly pay calculations.
• Apply consistent treatment to allowances, premiums and commission in line with statutory definitions.
• Run internal sense checks, including year-on-year comparisons and workforce distribution analysis.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Errors discovered late may require republication, increasing scrutiny and reputational risk.
• Inaccurate figures undermine confidence in pay and reporting governance.

Many employers adopt a two-stage review: a technical review of calculations followed by a strategic review focused on how the figures may be interpreted by employees and external stakeholders.

3. Senior sign-off and accountability

For most private and voluntary sector employers, the regulations require a written statement confirming that the published information is accurate. This must be signed by an appropriate senior individual.

What the law requires

• The written confirmation statement must be signed by the correct senior person for the employer’s legal structure.
• The statement must accompany the published gender pay gap data.

What the employer must decide or do

• Identify the correct signatory early in the reporting cycle.
• Ensure the signatory understands the scope of what they are confirming.
• Provide assurance through documented methodology, validation steps and summaries.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Missing or incorrect sign-off renders the report non-compliant.
• Senior individuals may face scrutiny if figures are later challenged.

Clear briefing and documentation at this stage reduces personal and organisational risk.

4. Publishing and submitting the report correctly

Publication is the final statutory step, but it is also the most visible stage of the process.

What the law requires

• The report must be published on the employer’s website in a publicly accessible location.
• The same information must be submitted via the government Gender Pay Gap Service.
• The published data must remain accessible for at least three years.

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide where the report will sit on the website and how it will be signposted.
• Ensure consistency between the website version and the government submission.
• Coordinate internal and external communications to manage employee and stakeholder expectations.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Failure to publish correctly may still constitute non-compliance.
• Poor communication can trigger unnecessary concern or negative attention.

5. Post-publication review and record keeping

Compliance does not end once the report is published.

What the law requires

• Gender pay gap information must remain publicly available for three years.

What the employer must decide or do

• Retain calculation workings, assumptions and validation records.
• Review stakeholder feedback and internal questions.
• Incorporate lessons learned into future reporting cycles.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Inadequate records weaken the employer’s ability to defend figures if challenged.
• Repeated avoidable errors increase long-term reputational and compliance risk.

Section F summary

A defensible gender pay gap reporting process is planned, repeatable and well governed. Employers should prepare in advance of the snapshot date, apply rigorous validation controls, secure informed senior sign-off and manage publication carefully. Treating reporting as an ongoing compliance process significantly reduces legal, reputational and operational risk.

Section G: Common employer mistakes and high-risk scenarios in gender pay gap reporting

Many compliance failures in gender pay gap reporting arise not from misunderstanding the law, but from weak governance, rushed execution or failure to anticipate how published data will be interpreted. The risks below are recurring across sectors and often result in avoidable regulatory, reputational and employee relations exposure.

1. Reporting when not legally required

Some employers choose to report gender pay gap data voluntarily even where they fall below the 250-employee threshold. While this may be driven by ESG strategy or group-wide consistency, it is not a legal requirement.

What the law requires

• Employers with fewer than 250 relevant employees on the snapshot date are not required to report.

What the employer must decide or do

• Decide whether voluntary reporting serves a clear and defensible purpose.
• Ensure stakeholders understand that reporting is voluntary and explain any changes in approach year to year.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Voluntary reporting can attract scrutiny without the protection of a statutory obligation.
• Stopping voluntary reporting in later years can raise questions about transparency or governance.

Employers should avoid default voluntary reporting without a documented rationale and approval process.

2. Publishing inaccurate data and attempting to correct it later

Once gender pay gap data is published, corrections are difficult to make without drawing additional attention.

What the law requires

• Employers must publish accurate data calculated in accordance with the regulations.

What the employer must decide or do

• Build sufficient validation and review time into reporting timelines.
• Treat publication as final, not provisional.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Republication of corrected figures can undermine confidence in governance.
• Regulators and stakeholders may question the reliability of the reporting process.

In practice, accurate reporting close to the deadline is often less damaging than timely but incorrect publication.

3. Allowing gender pay gap figures to trigger unmanaged equal pay risk

A gender pay gap does not indicate unlawful pay practice. Risk arises when employers blur the line between statistical reporting and legal pay compliance.

Gender pay gap reporting does not assess whether men and women are paid equally for the same work and does not, by itself, establish liability under equal pay law.

What the employer must decide or do

• Prepare managers and HR teams to explain the distinction clearly and consistently.
• Decide whether figures justify a legally privileged equal pay audit.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Informal explanations or written statements may be relied upon in later disputes.
• Reactive pay adjustments can introduce new inconsistencies and legal exposure.

Employers should separate statistical analysis from legal equal pay review and seek specialist advice where concerns arise.

4. Inconsistent narratives and shifting explanations

Employers that publish narratives alongside their figures often struggle with consistency across reporting years.

What the law requires

• No narrative is required by statute.

What the employer must decide or do

• Ensure narratives are evidence-based and aligned with workforce data.
• Maintain continuity in explanations unless there is a clear, documented reason for change.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Shifting explanations can appear defensive or unreliable.
• Inconsistency undermines credibility with employees and external stakeholders.

Consistency does not mean repetition, but it does require coherence.

5. Treating reporting as an HR task rather than a governance issue

Gender pay gap reporting is often delegated entirely to HR. While HR plays a central role, this can underestimate the wider governance and risk implications.

What the employer must decide or do

• Involve payroll, finance, legal and senior leadership in the reporting process.
• Ensure accountability for decisions with reputational or legal impact.

What happens if you get it wrong

• Material risks may be missed or poorly escalated.
• HR teams may be left managing issues that require senior or legal input.

Section G summary

The most significant risks in gender pay gap reporting arise from avoidable mistakes: unnecessary reporting, inaccurate publication, conflating pay gaps with equal pay, inconsistent explanations and weak governance. Employers that treat reporting as a cross-functional compliance obligation are better positioned to manage scrutiny and reduce long-term risk.

Section H: Gender pay gap reporting FAQs for employers

This section addresses the questions most commonly raised by HR professionals, directors and business owners when managing gender pay gap reporting. The answers reflect the current UK legal position and focus on compliance, risk and employer decision-making.

What is gender pay gap reporting?

Gender pay gap reporting is the statutory obligation on certain UK employers to calculate and publish prescribed figures showing differences in average pay and bonuses between male and female employees. It is a transparency requirement and does not assess whether individuals are paid equally for the same work.

Which employers are required to report gender pay gap data?

Employers with 250 or more relevant employees on the applicable snapshot date are legally required to report. The obligation applies per legal employer, not automatically across group companies, and must be reassessed each reporting year.

Is gender pay gap reporting the same as equal pay?

No. Equal pay is a legal right under the Equality Act 2010 requiring men and women to receive equal pay for equal work. Gender pay gap reporting is a statistical comparison of average pay across the workforce. A gender pay gap does not, by itself, indicate unlawful pay practice.

Is having a gender pay gap illegal?

No. A gender pay gap is not unlawful. However, a significant or persistent gap may prompt scrutiny of pay practices and could highlight potential equal pay or discrimination risks if differences cannot be objectively justified.

Do employers have to reduce or eliminate their gender pay gap?

No. The regulations do not require employers to reduce or eliminate their gender pay gap or to meet improvement targets. The legal obligation is limited to accurate calculation and timely publication of the prescribed figures.

Do employers have to publish a narrative or action plan?

No. Publishing a supporting narrative or action plan is voluntary. Many employers choose to do so to provide context or demonstrate commitment, but poorly framed narratives or commitments can increase legal and reputational risk.

Who must sign the gender pay gap report?

Most private and voluntary sector employers must include a written statement confirming the accuracy of the report, signed by an appropriate senior individual such as a director or designated member. Certain public authorities are exempt from the written statement requirement.

Can employers be fined for failing to report?

There are no automatic financial penalties for failing to report. However, the Equality and Human Rights Commission can take enforcement action and seek court orders requiring compliance. Failure to comply with a court order can result in unlimited fines.

Does overtime count in gender pay gap calculations?

No. Overtime pay is expressly excluded from hourly pay calculations under the gender pay gap reporting regulations. Bonus pay is reported separately under different rules.

What happens if incorrect figures are published?

Publishing inaccurate data places the employer in breach of the regulations. Correcting figures later can attract additional scrutiny and undermine confidence in governance. Employers should prioritise accuracy and validation before publication.

How long must gender pay gap data remain available?

Employers must keep their gender pay gap information publicly accessible for at least three years from the date of publication.

Can gender pay gap reporting trigger legal claims?

The reporting obligation itself does not create liability for equal pay or discrimination claims. However, published figures may prompt employee questions or challenges, particularly where gaps are large or unexplained.

Section H summary

Gender pay gap reporting is a defined statutory obligation focused on transparency rather than outcomes. Employers must report accurately and on time but are not legally required to justify or remedy a reported gap. Understanding the limits of the legal duty, and where indirect risk arises, is critical to managing reporting defensibly.

Conclusion: Employer compliance takeaways on gender pay gap reporting

Gender pay gap reporting is a narrow statutory obligation with wide practical consequences. For employers in scope, the legal duty is clear: assess coverage each year, calculate the prescribed figures using the statutory methodology, publish them on time and retain them for the required period. The law does not require employers to justify, explain or eliminate a gender pay gap, and it does not impose targets or improvement duties.

The risk for employers lies not in the existence of a gender pay gap, but in how reporting is governed and communicated. Late or inaccurate publication, inconsistent narratives, or statements that blur the line between statistical reporting and equal pay compliance can create regulatory attention, reputational damage and workforce relations issues that extend far beyond the reporting exercise itself.

From a governance perspective, gender pay gap reporting should be treated as a repeatable compliance process rather than a one-off HR task. Clear ownership, robust data validation, informed senior sign-off and disciplined communication are essential to keeping reporting defensible. Optional steps such as narratives or action plans should only be adopted where they align with organisational strategy and can be supported by evidence, without creating unnecessary legal exposure.

Handled properly, gender pay gap reporting is a manageable and predictable obligation. Handled poorly, it can become a recurring source of risk, distraction and scrutiny. The difference lies in clarity about what the law requires, realism about what the figures do and do not show, and deliberate employer decision-making grounded in governance rather than reaction.

Glossary

Useful Links