SOC Code Guide for Employers 2026

Section A: What is a SOC Code for UK Sponsorship?

A SOC code is the four-digit occupation code used to classify the job a sponsored worker will be doing. SOC stands for Standard Occupational Classification. Employers now use SOC 2020 occupation codes when assigning a Certificate of Sponsorship.

Under the Skilled Worker route, the code identifies the occupation being sponsored and determines how that role is treated under the immigration rules. The job still has to fall within an occupation that can support sponsorship under the current rules.

SOC 2020 occupation codes are also used under other sponsored work routes, including Global Business Mobility and Scale-up. The eligible occupations and salary rules differ by route, so employers should check the rules that apply to the route they intend to use.

For an employer looking to sponsor a hire, the SOC code is one of the first things to establish. A role can have a valid occupation code without necessarily being eligible for the Skilled Worker visa.

Section B: When Should Employers Identify the SOC Code?

Employers should identify the likely SOC code early in the recruitment process, before progressing too far with a sponsored hire. The code can affect whether the role can be sponsored and which salary requirements will apply.

Checking the code early gives HR a chance to identify any problems before the salary, start date and offer are finalised. If the role does not fit an eligible occupation, or the salary does not work for the relevant code, those issues are easier to address before the employer has committed to the hire.

The occupation code should be confirmed before the Certificate of Sponsorship is assigned. The CoS records the code and other details of the job that will support the worker’s visa application.

Leaving the SOC code until the CoS stage creates avoidable risk. By that point, the candidate may already have accepted the offer and the business may have planned around a start date that depends on sponsorship succeeding.

Section C: How Do You Choose the Correct SOC Code?

The correct SOC code should reflect the job the worker will actually be doing. Job titles can help narrow the search, but they are not enough on their own. Employers need to look at the duties and responsibilities of the role and identify the SOC 2020 occupation that provides the closest fit.

The CASCOT occupation coding tool can help identify possible codes. The Office for National Statistics also publishes the SOC 2020 coding index and occupation descriptions, which employers can use to compare the role against the occupations returned by the search.

Should the SOC code match the job title or the duties?

The job title is not decisive. The code should reflect the work the worker will actually perform.

Different businesses often use different titles for similar roles, while the same title can describe very different jobs. The safer approach is to look at what the person will actually be responsible for and what they will spend most of their time doing.

What if the exact job title is not listed?

An exact title does not need to appear in the SOC index for a code to be appropriate. Employers can search for similar titles and related occupations, then compare those descriptions with the role they are recruiting for.

A close title match should not override a poor match on duties. Equally, a different occupation title does not rule out a code where the underlying work falls within that classification.

What if more than one SOC code could apply?

Some roles can reasonably fit more than one occupation. Home Office guidance recognises this and directs sponsors to use the code that most closely fits the job or contains the duties the worker will spend most of their time doing.

If two codes look plausible, compare them against the actual role rather than the immigration outcome. A less appropriate code should not be selected because the better-fitting code would make the job ineligible or carry a higher going rate.

How should employers approach hybrid roles?

Hybrid roles can combine duties associated with more than one occupation, particularly where a job crosses technical, managerial or operational functions. In those cases, the employer should identify the occupation that best reflects the main purpose of the role and the duties the worker will spend most of their time performing.

Look at the role as a whole rather than counting individual tasks. A job should not be classified under an occupation simply because some duties fall within that code if the worker’s principal responsibilities point to another occupation.

Where the balance of duties is genuinely close, the employer should document why the selected code provides the better overall fit before assigning the Certificate of Sponsorship.

Section D: Is the SOC Code Eligible for Skilled Worker Sponsorship?

Once the SOC code has been identified, check how the occupation is currently treated under the Skilled Worker rules. Home Office occupation tables classify SOC 2020 codes as Higher Skilled, Medium Skilled or Ineligible.

Higher Skilled occupations can generally be sponsored, subject to the other Skilled Worker requirements. Medium Skilled jobs face additional restrictions, while an Ineligible occupation cannot normally support a new Skilled Worker application.

When can a Medium Skilled role be sponsored?

For a new applicant, a Medium Skilled job will generally need to be on the Immigration Salary List or Temporary Shortage List, unless a specific exception applies.

Existing Skilled Workers can be treated differently. A worker in a Medium Skilled occupation may be able to extend where their first Certificate of Sponsorship was issued before 22 July 2025 and they have continuously held Skilled Worker permission since then.

Does appearing in the occupation table mean the role can be sponsored?

Not always. Some occupation codes apply only to specified jobs or come with additional conditions. Check the full entry for the code rather than relying on the occupation title or assuming that its appearance in the table is enough.

The current rules should be checked each time sponsorship is considered. A role that qualified previously may not be treated in the same way for a new hire.

Section E: How Does the SOC Code Affect Skilled Worker Salary?

The SOC code identifies the going rate for the occupation. Employers then need to check that the proposed salary meets both the applicable general Skilled Worker salary threshold and the required level of the going rate for the worker.

For most occupations, the published annual going rate is based on a 37.5-hour working week and has to be adjusted where the worker’s weekly hours differ. Some occupations use different standard hours, so check the basis given for the relevant rate rather than relying on the annual figure alone.

Does every Skilled Worker have to meet the full going rate?

No. Some workers can qualify at a permitted percentage of the going rate where they meet the conditions for the relevant salary option. The applicable general salary threshold also has to be met.

The figure listed against the SOC code is therefore not necessarily the minimum salary for the individual hire. Our SOC codes with salary guide provides the published rates by occupation, while our Skilled Worker going rate guide explains how to work out the salary requirement for a particular worker.

What about health and education occupations?

Specified health and education occupations have different salary arrangements linked to national pay scales. Employers recruiting into these roles need to check the requirements for the particular occupation and pay framework.

Section F: How Should Employers Evidence and Record the SOC Code Decision?

The employer should be able to explain how the SOC code was selected and show that the classification is consistent with the role being sponsored. The amount of supporting material an employer needs will depend on how straightforward the classification is, but the employer should be able to show how the selected code relates to the job itself rather than relying only on a job title or an undocumented assumption.

Where the classification is less obvious, the employer should draw together the information held by the people involved in the recruitment and sponsorship process. That may include HR, the hiring manager and the individual responsible for assigning or checking the Certificate of Sponsorship. No single person will necessarily hold all of the relevant information.

Who should be involved in choosing and approving the SOC code?

The people involved will depend on how the organisation manages recruitment and sponsorship. HR may understand the recruitment process and contractual terms, while the hiring manager is usually better placed to explain the substance of a specialist or technical role. The person responsible for assigning or checking the Certificate of Sponsorship should make sure the code and supporting job information are consistent before the CoS is assigned.

Where responsibility is split between different people, the organisation should avoid treating SOC coding as an isolated administrative step. The person entering the code into the Sponsor Management System may not be the person best placed to decide what occupation the role falls within, so input from the relevant business area may be needed before the classification is finalised.

How does the role’s position in the organisation help with SOC classification?

Organisational context can help where the job title or duties do not point clearly to one occupation. Relevant context can include where the role sits within the reporting structure, the level and nature of its responsibilities, the type of work carried out by the team and how the role differs from other positions in the organisation. That should support rather than replace the analysis of the actual duties. It can be particularly useful for managerial, specialist and hybrid roles where two occupation codes initially appear plausible and the employer needs to explain why one provides the better overall fit.

What records should support the SOC code?

The records should be sufficient to show why the selected occupation code fits the role. Depending on the circumstances, that may include the job description, recruitment records, details of the reporting line, information about the role’s place within the business and any internal discussion needed to resolve an uncertain classification.

The salary and working hours should also be consistent with the information used for sponsorship. Where two codes were seriously considered, a short contemporaneous note explaining why one was selected can provide a useful record of the reasoning if the decision is questioned later.

What SOC code information is recorded on the Certificate of Sponsorship?

When the Certificate of Sponsorship is assigned, the sponsor records the occupation code and information about the sponsored job through the Sponsor Management System. The occupation code, job description, salary, working hours and other relevant job details should be consistent with the role being offered.

Any obvious inconsistency should be resolved before the CoS is assigned. The sponsorship record should reflect the same role that the employer would be able to explain and evidence if UKVI later asks how the occupation was classified.

Section G: How Closely Does the Home Office Check SOC Codes?

The occupation code entered on a Certificate of Sponsorship should not be assumed to pass without scrutiny. When considering a Skilled Worker application, the Home Office can assess whether the code used by the sponsor is appropriate for the job and whether the information provided about the role supports that classification.

Questions can arise where the job description, duties or other information about the role do not appear consistent with the occupation code. UKVI can request further information or evidence where this is needed to assess the application or the sponsor’s compliance with its duties.

What can the Home Office look at when checking a SOC code?

The Home Office can consider the information provided about the sponsored role and whether it supports the occupation selected. Where there are reasonable grounds to believe that the sponsor has chosen a less appropriate code, the Skilled Worker rules allow the Home Office to examine whether the choice was made because the more appropriate code would make the job ineligible or would carry a higher going rate.

A classification based on isolated duties or a broad reading of the occupation may be harder to justify where the wider information about the role points elsewhere.

Can UKVI ask the employer for more information?

Yes. The Home Office can seek further information or evidence when assessing a sponsored application or the sponsor’s compliance with its duties. Employers should be in a position to explain the occupation used and provide information that supports the role described in the sponsorship record.

A request for information may need input from the people responsible for managing sponsorship and the business area responsible for the role. Any explanation given to the Home Office should be consistent with the job as sponsored and the records held by the organisation.

Can the SOC code be scrutinised again at extension or settlement?

The occupation and sponsored employment can remain relevant when a worker later applies to extend their permission or for settlement. Where the later application depends on the continuing sponsored role, UKVI can consider the sponsorship information and whether the relevant Skilled Worker requirements are met at that stage.

An initial visa grant should not be treated as confirmation that the original SOC code can never be questioned again. A classification issue in the sponsorship history may become relevant if the worker makes a later application and UKVI examines the role or the basis on which sponsorship has continued.

What does this mean for sponsors?

Employers should approach SOC coding on the basis that the classification may need to withstand scrutiny beyond the point at which the CoS is assigned. A coding decision that can be explained consistently against the role puts the sponsor in a stronger position if questions arise during the visa process, a later application or a Home Office compliance review.

Section H: What if the SOC Code is Wrong or the Role Changes?

What the employer needs to do depends on when the problem is identified. An incorrect occupation code found before a Certificate of Sponsorship is assigned is usually easier to correct. Once the CoS has been assigned or used for a visa application, the employer needs to check what can still be changed and whether a new CoS or further immigration action is required.

If the coding issue forms part of wider concerns about inaccurate sponsorship information or poor sponsor compliance, the consequences can extend beyond the individual application. In more serious cases, Home Office action can include suspension of the sponsor licence or revocation.

What if the SOC code is wrong before the CoS is assigned?

If the assigned CoS contains the wrong occupation code, Home Office guidance treats this as a significant error. The sponsor must withdraw the CoS and assign a new one. A wrong SOC code cannot be corrected by adding a sponsor note.

If the worker has not yet submitted their visa application, the sponsorship position should be corrected before they apply.

What if the wrong SOC code is found after the CoS is assigned?

If the worker has not yet submitted their visa application, correct the sponsorship position before they apply.

If the assigned CoS contains the wrong occupation code, Home Office guidance treats this as a significant error and requires the sponsor to withdraw the CoS and assign a new one. You cannot correct a wrong SOC code with a sponsor note.

What if the visa application has already been submitted?

Once the application is pending, avoid trying to correct the position informally through the Sponsor Management System. The employer and worker need to establish whether the error can be dealt with within the existing application or whether variation, withdrawal or a fresh application needs to be considered.

The right approach will depend on the type of error and the stage reached. At this point, it is usually sensible to take advice before making changes because the available options can affect timing, fees and the worker’s existing immigration position.

What if the problem is discovered after the visa has been granted?

First establish whether the original code was wrong or whether the worker’s job has changed since the visa was granted. Those are different problems and may require different action.

If the worker is now carrying out a role that differs materially from the job for which they were sponsored, check whether the change needs to be reported or whether a new sponsorship and visa application is required.

What if the worker’s role changes?

A change in duties or job title within the same occupation code does not normally require a new Skilled Worker application, although the employer may still need to report the change through the Sponsor Management System.

If the new job falls under a different occupation code, the worker will normally need a new Certificate of Sponsorship and must apply to update their Skilled Worker permission before starting the new role. Check the immigration position before implementing the change.

When should an employer take advice?

Take advice where the correct code remains unclear, the CoS has already been used, a visa application is pending, UKVI has raised questions or the worker is already doing work that may fall under a different occupation. The later the problem is identified, the less straightforward the options can become.

Summary

Employers should identify the SOC code early, check that it fits the role and confirm that the occupation and salary work for Skilled Worker sponsorship before assigning the Certificate of Sponsorship.

If the code is unclear, keep enough information to explain why it was chosen. UKVI can question whether the occupation matches the job, and the issue can come up again if the worker later extends their visa or applies for settlement.

Where the role changes or a coding error is found after sponsorship has progressed, check the position before making changes to the CoS, the worker’s job or their immigration arrangements.

Need Assistance?

If you are unsure which SOC code applies to a role, need to assess competing codes or have identified a potential coding issue after sponsorship has progressed, our UK immigration lawyers can advise on the appropriate classification and next steps. Contact us for advice on your organisation’s circumstances.

We also provide immigration compliance training for HR and anyone in your organisation responsible for, or involved in, sponsored recruitment.

SOC Code FAQs for Employers

Who is responsible for choosing the SOC code?

The sponsor is responsible for selecting the appropriate SOC 2020 occupation code for the sponsored role. An immigration adviser can assist with the classification, but responsibility for the information used for sponsorship remains with the sponsor.

Should the SOC code match the employee’s job title?

Not necessarily. The job title can help identify possible occupations, but the code should reflect the work the employee will actually perform. Employers should not select a code solely because its occupation title resembles their internal job title.

What if two SOC codes could apply to the same role?

Where more than one code appears plausible, the sponsor should use the code that most closely fits the job or contains the duties the worker will spend most of their time doing. A less appropriate code should not be selected to obtain a more favourable immigration outcome.

Can employers use CASCOT to find a SOC code?

Yes. The CASCOT occupation coding tool can help identify possible SOC codes. The result should then be considered against the actual role rather than treated as a definitive classification.

Does a valid SOC code mean the job can be sponsored?

No. The occupation also has to meet the current Skilled Worker requirements. Higher Skilled, Medium Skilled and Ineligible occupations are treated differently, with additional restrictions applying to Medium Skilled roles.

Does the SOC code affect the Skilled Worker salary?

Yes. The code identifies the occupation-specific going rate. The employer must then apply the relevant Skilled Worker salary rules to determine the minimum salary requirement for the individual worker.

Can UKVI question the SOC code on a Certificate of Sponsorship?

Yes. UKVI can consider whether the occupation code is appropriate for the sponsored role and can request further information or evidence where necessary to assess the application or the sponsor’s compliance.

What happens if the wrong SOC code is entered on a CoS?

If an assigned CoS contains the wrong occupation code, Home Office guidance treats this as a significant error. The sponsor must withdraw the CoS and assign a new one; a wrong SOC code cannot be corrected with a sponsor note. If the worker has already submitted their visa application, the employer and worker should check the immigration implications before taking further action.

Does a visa grant confirm that the SOC code was correct?

Not necessarily. The sponsored occupation can remain relevant in later Skilled Worker applications and sponsor compliance activity. Employers should not rely on the initial grant alone as confirmation that a questionable classification can be left unresolved.

Does a worker need a new visa if their SOC code changes?

If the worker moves into a job under a different occupation code, they will normally need a new Certificate of Sponsorship and must apply to update their Skilled Worker permission before starting the new role. Changes within the same occupation code may still need to be reported by the sponsor.

Glossary

Additional Resources & Links