US Transit Visa (C Visa) for Employers

The US transit visa is often overlooked in corporate travel planning, yet it remains a frequent source of disruption for employers with internationally mobile staff. Employees who are not intending to enter the United States can still be refused boarding or denied transit if the correct visa or travel authorisation is not in place. HR teams, business owners, and mobility managers should treat US routing decisions as part of broader US immigration risk management rather than a last-minute travel admin task.

US immigration rules take a strict approach to transit. The fact that an employee is “only passing through” the US does not remove the need for formal permission, and assumptions based on airline routing or airport layout regularly prove wrong. This is less about immigration strategy and more about operational resilience and risk control, particularly where international travel sits inside a regulated approval process.

What this article is about:
This article explains how the US Transit (C) visa works and when it is required. It is written for employers and HR professionals who manage international business travel and need to understand eligibility rules, workforce risk, compliance exposure, and practical decision-making when staff transit through the United States. It covers when a transit visa is required, who is likely to need one, how the application process works, and what employers should do to prevent disruption and liability.

Section A: What is a US Transit Visa and when is it required?

The US Transit Visa, formally known as the C visa, allows a foreign national to pass through the United States en route to another country. It is not a visitor visa and does not permit business activity, meetings, or any form of productive work in the US. Its sole purpose is to facilitate immediate and continuous transit. If an employee’s purpose is anything other than transit, you should treat the case as a broader US visa classification question rather than a transit issue.

For employers, the key point is that US immigration law does not operate on “airside transit” assumptions in the way many other jurisdictions do. Most US airports require passengers to clear immigration, collect baggage, and re-check for onward flights, even if the traveller never leaves the airport. While limited operational exceptions can exist in practice for certain routes or airline arrangements, employers should not plan on any exception unless it is confirmed in advance and the employee’s documentation is clearly compliant.

A transit visa is typically required where an employee is travelling between two non-US countries and the itinerary involves a stopover in the United States, including for refuelling or onward connection. The requirement applies even if the transit period is short and the employee has no intention of entering the US beyond what is necessary to catch the next flight.

Employers should also be alert to situations where a transit visa may be required unexpectedly. Employees who are not eligible for ESTA under the Visa Waiver Program must hold a valid visa for any US transit. In addition, individuals who would normally be ESTA-eligible may still require a visa if they fall within restricted categories, such as those with prior US immigration violations or certain criminal histories. Employers managing repeated US routing should also understand the Visa Waiver Program rules and the practical limits of authorisation checks.

Confusion often arises between the C transit visa and the B-1 business visitor visa. While both are non-immigrant classifications, they serve entirely different purposes. A B-1 visa allows limited business activity in the US, whereas a C visa does not. If the employee intends to undertake business visitor activity, the correct classification is often a B-1/B-2 visa route rather than transit. Using the wrong classification can result in refusal of boarding or denial of entry at the port of entry, with immediate consequences for the employer’s travel plans.

Section B: Who is eligible for a US Transit Visa?

Eligibility for a US Transit (C) visa is determined primarily by nationality, travel history, and immigration risk profile. From an employer perspective, this is where advance screening becomes critical, because assumptions based on passport alone often miss underlying risk factors that can trigger a visa requirement or refusal.

Most employees who require a transit visa are nationals of countries that are not part of the US Visa Waiver Program. These individuals cannot rely on ESTA and must hold a valid visa even if they are only changing planes in the US. Employers with globally diverse workforces should treat any non–Visa Waiver Program nationality as a potential transit visa case unless confirmed otherwise, and build that check into travel booking workflows rather than leaving it to the day of departure.

However, ESTA eligibility does not automatically remove transit risk. Employees who are technically eligible for ESTA may still be refused authorisation or found ineligible if they have previous US immigration breaches, prior overstays, visa refusals, or certain criminal convictions. Where there is any concern, employers should treat the issue as an ESTA application and admissibility risk assessment, rather than assuming authorisation will be granted. Specific red flags often arise where the employee has a criminal record and ESTA is in play, because even historic matters can trigger refusal or enhanced scrutiny.

Security and admissibility screening also plays a role. Transit visa applicants must demonstrate that they have a confirmed onward journey, permission to enter the final destination country, and a credible intention to depart the US immediately. Any inconsistency in travel purpose or documentation can raise concerns at interview or at the port of entry. Employers should also recognise that repeated US travel issues can affect an employee’s wider US mobility options, including future eligibility for a B-1 visa for business travel or, where relevant, longer-term assignments under a US working visa route.

Employers should be particularly cautious where employees have dual nationality, refugee travel documents, or recently issued passports. These situations often trigger additional scrutiny and may affect whether a transit visa is required. Relying on last-minute airline advice is rarely sufficient and often comes too late to resolve the issue. Where an employee has any pending US immigration matter, HR may also need to consider broader case progress and documentary readiness, including practical checks such as USCIS case status where that is relevant to the individual’s wider US position.

Section B summary:
Eligibility for a US transit visa depends on more than nationality alone. Employers should assess ESTA eligibility, prior immigration history, and security risk well in advance of travel, because failure to do so can result in refused boarding, missed connections, and operational disruption.

Section C: Employer compliance and workforce travel risk

From a compliance standpoint, US transit visa issues sit at the intersection of immigration control and business continuity. While employers are not sponsoring the visa, they remain exposed to the operational and reputational consequences of travel failure. A refused boarding or entry incident can derail projects, strain client relationships, and trigger internal scrutiny of travel governance, particularly where US routing is a recurring feature of international assignments.

One of the most common employer risks is assuming that visa compliance sits entirely with the employee. In practice, employees often rely on HR or travel teams to confirm routing and documentation requirements. Where incorrect advice is given or checks are not performed, employers may face indirect liability through disruption, employee relations issues, and failure to meet duty of care standards. For organisations operating across multiple jurisdictions, US transit issues should be treated as part of a broader US immigration compliance framework rather than an isolated travel problem.

Border refusals can also have lasting consequences for the individual employee. A failed transit attempt may be recorded on US immigration systems, increasing the likelihood of future refusals or enhanced scrutiny. This can restrict the employer’s future deployment options for that individual, particularly in senior, client-facing, or specialist roles where travel flexibility is critical. In some cases, previous transit refusals can affect eligibility for future US visas, even where the employee later applies under a different classification.

Employers should also consider data protection and duty of care obligations. Sending an employee on an itinerary that carries a foreseeable risk of refusal or detention raises questions around reasonable care, particularly where alternative routings avoiding the US are available. For regulated businesses, repeated failures may also be viewed as weak risk management or poor governance. HR teams should ensure that any US travel, including transit-only journeys, is reviewed with the same level of scrutiny as substantive US visits, especially where travel intersects with US working visa or business visitor planning.

Effective employers implement pre-travel screening processes that flag US transit automatically. This includes confirming nationality, ESTA eligibility, visa history, and routing at the point of booking rather than days before departure. Where risk is identified, HR should pause travel and seek specialist immigration advice rather than relying on airline discretion or informal guidance.

Section C summary:
US transit visa issues are a workforce risk management problem, not just an individual travel inconvenience. Employers should treat transit compliance as part of their duty of care and travel governance framework to avoid disruption, reputational damage, and long-term mobility constraints.

Section D: Application process, timing, and cost considerations

The US transit visa application process follows the standard framework for US non-immigrant visas and requires advance planning. Employees must submit a DS-160 application, pay the relevant visa fee, and attend an appointment at a US embassy or consulate outside the United States. For employers, the core risk is not complexity but timing, particularly where international travel is scheduled around fixed commercial deadlines.

Processing times vary significantly by location and demand. In some jurisdictions, interview appointments may be available within weeks, while in others waiting times of several months are common. Employers should factor US transit risk into travel planning at the point international assignments or client visits are agreed, rather than after flights have been booked. Where timing is critical, HR teams may need to monitor US visa appointment availability and build contingencies into project plans.

A transit visa application must demonstrate immediate and continuous onward travel. Applicants are expected to show confirmed flight bookings, evidence of permission to enter the destination country, and a clear explanation of the travel route. Any suggestion that the employee intends to remain in the US, even briefly, can result in refusal. Employers should ensure that travel documentation, internal approval records, and supporting letters are aligned, particularly where the employee also holds or has previously applied for another US visa.

While interview waivers exist in limited circumstances, they are discretionary and vary by post. Employers should not assume that a waiver will apply, even for repeat travellers or those with prior US visas. Where an interview is required, employees should be prepared for questions around travel purpose, routing choices, and onward destination, and HR teams may wish to provide guidance in advance. Understanding the US visa interview process can help reduce refusal risk.

Cost is usually modest in isolation but becomes material when combined with delays, rebooking fees, and lost productivity. Employers should decide in advance whether transit visa costs are borne by the business or the employee and document this clearly within travel and expenses policies. Inconsistent treatment can create employee relations issues, particularly where travel is mandatory or frequent.

In some cases, employers may choose to avoid the issue entirely by rerouting travel through non-US hubs. While this may increase ticket costs, it can be a more reliable and commercially sensible solution where visa delays or refusals would otherwise jeopardise critical business activity.

Section D summary:
US transit visas require early planning and realistic timing assumptions. Employers should account for interview delays, clarify cost responsibility, and consider alternative routing where transit risk outweighs commercial benefit.

FAQs

Can an employee work in the US on a transit visa?
No. A US Transit (C) visa does not permit any form of work or business activity in the United States. The employee must be in immediate and continuous transit to another country. If the individual intends to attend meetings, negotiate contracts, or undertake any productive activity, the correct route is usually a B-1/B-2 visa or another appropriate US working visa classification.

Is a transit visa required if the employee does not leave the airport?
In most cases, yes. US airports generally require international passengers to clear immigration and customs even when connecting to an onward international flight. Employers should not assume that remaining inside the terminal removes the need for a visa. Any exception should be confirmed in advance and never relied upon without documentary certainty.

Do employees need a transit visa if they have ESTA?
Employees who are eligible for the Visa Waiver Program and hold valid ESTA authorisation can usually transit the US without a separate transit visa. However, ESTA eligibility can be lost due to prior immigration breaches, previous refusals, or criminal history. Where ESTA is refused or unavailable, a transit visa or alternative US visa will be required.

What happens if an employee is refused transit?
If an employee is refused boarding by the airline or denied entry by US border officials, they may be returned to their point of departure or held pending removal arrangements. This can result in missed onward connections, immediate commercial disruption, and a record on US immigration systems that may affect future travel or visa applications.

Is a transit visa the same as a business visitor visa?
No. A transit visa is strictly for passing through the US en route to another country. A business visitor visa allows limited business activity within the US. Using a transit visa where business activity is intended is likely to result in refusal and may prejudice future applications.

Conclusion

US transit visa compliance is a practical risk issue for employers managing international travel. The absence of genuine airside transit in most US airports means employees can require formal immigration permission even where the United States is not their destination. Failure to identify this early exposes businesses to travel disruption, reputational damage, and longer-term workforce mobility constraints.

Employers should embed US transit checks into travel approval processes, assess ESTA and visa eligibility before bookings are made, and treat transit risk as part of wider duty of care obligations. Where uncertainty exists, early legal advice or alternative routing can prevent costly last-minute failures. Employers managing cross-border mobility at scale should position transit planning within a broader US immigration governance framework so that US routing decisions do not undermine operational delivery.

Glossary

Useful Links