Remote Work: Employment Law for Employers

Remote work has become a permanent feature of workforce planning for many UK employers. What began as a short-term response to the COVID-19 pandemic has evolved into a long-term shift in how organisations structure roles, manage teams and define the workplace. For some businesses, remote working is now the default operating model rather than an exception.

Despite this shift, UK employment law has not created a separate legal framework for remote work. Employees who work remotely remain subject to the same statutory rights and protections as those based in an employer’s premises. This creates a common misconception risk for employers: while the location of work may change, legal responsibility does not. In practice, remote working can increase compliance exposure if it is not managed carefully.

Remote work arrangements raise complex legal issues around contractual terms, variation of employment contracts, flexible working rights, equality and discrimination law, health and safety duties, working time compliance, data protection and performance management. Employers must also consider how remote working interacts with organisational policies, management control and long-term workforce planning. Informal or poorly documented remote working arrangements are a frequent source of disputes and tribunal claims.

What this article is about
This article provides a comprehensive UK employment law guide for employers managing employees who work remotely. It explains how remote work is treated under UK law, how it should be reflected in employment contracts and policies, and how employers can manage legal risk across health and safety, flexible working, equality law, data protection and performance management. The guide is written for business owners and HR professionals responsible for designing, approving or overseeing remote working arrangements.

Section A: What Is Remote Work Under UK Employment Law

Remote work describes a working arrangement where an employee carries out their contractual duties away from the employer’s premises, typically from home but sometimes from another agreed location. Under UK employment law, remote work is not defined as a separate legal status. Instead, it is a way in which an employee performs their role, and it must be assessed by reference to existing employment legislation, contract law principles and regulatory guidance.

This distinction matters because employers sometimes assume that remote working creates a different set of rights or a reduced level of legal responsibility. That is not the case. Employees who work remotely remain employees for all legal purposes and are entitled to the same statutory protections relating to pay, working time, health and safety, discrimination, family rights and unfair dismissal.

1. Remote work, homeworking and hybrid working

In practice, the term remote work is often used interchangeably with homeworking and hybrid working, but these concepts can carry different legal and contractual implications. Homeworking usually refers to an arrangement where an employee’s home is their primary or contractual place of work. Hybrid working involves a structured division of time between the employer’s premises and a remote location. Remote work is broader and may describe roles where there is no fixed workplace or where attendance at the employer’s premises is occasional rather than routine.

2. Why labels matter less than reality

From a legal perspective, the key issue is not the label used, but how the arrangement is documented and operated. Employment tribunals will look beyond terminology and consider the substance of the working relationship. If an employee works remotely on a long-term basis, with the employer’s knowledge and consent, this may affect how contractual terms such as place of work, mobility and flexibility are interpreted.

Remote work can arise in several ways. It may be expressly agreed at the start of employment and written into the contract. It may result from a formal flexible working request. It may also develop informally over time, particularly where remote working arrangements introduced as a temporary measure are allowed to continue without review. Each of these routes carries different legal consequences for employers, particularly when circumstances change and the employer wishes to alter or withdraw the arrangement.

3. Implied rights and custom and practice risk

Employers should be alert to the risk that remote working may become an implied contractual right. This can occur where remote working is applied in a way that is sufficiently consistent and established. Tribunal analysis in this area commonly focuses on whether the arrangement is regular and repeated, has operated for a meaningful period, and has continued with employer knowledge or acquiescence such that it can be said to form part of the contract by custom and practice.

Employers must also be aware that remote work does not remove the concept of a workplace for legal purposes. The employee’s remote location may be treated as a workplace for the purposes of health and safety law, working time compliance and, in some cases, tax and regulatory obligations. This makes clarity and documentation critical.

Section A summary
Remote work is not a distinct legal category under UK employment law, but a method of performing contractual duties away from the employer’s premises. The legal significance of remote work lies in how it is agreed, documented and managed over time. Employers that fail to define remote working arrangements clearly risk creating implied contractual rights and increasing their exposure to disputes when arrangements change.

Section B: Contracts, Variation and Place of Work Clauses

Employment contracts sit at the centre of any lawful remote working arrangement. While employers may view remote work as an operational or cultural decision, its legal enforceability depends on how it aligns with contractual terms, particularly those relating to place of work, flexibility and variation.

Most UK employment contracts specify a place of work. This may be a fixed location, such as a particular office, or it may include a degree of flexibility through a mobility or flexibility clause. Where a contract states that an employee’s place of work is the employer’s premises, allowing the employee to work remotely does not automatically change that term unless the contract is formally varied. However, over time, a remote working arrangement can become contractually binding if it is treated as permanent and not clearly framed as temporary or discretionary.

1. Contract variation and employee consent

Contract variation is a common risk area for employers. Any permanent change to an employee’s place of work will usually require the employee’s agreement. This is typically achieved through a written contract variation, issuing a revised contract, or documenting the arrangement in a clear written agreement. Employers that allow remote working without documenting the arrangement may inadvertently create an implied variation.

Employment tribunals will consider factors such as the length of time the arrangement has been in place, whether it has been applied consistently, and whether the employer has reserved the right to review or withdraw it. Where remote work is intended to remain discretionary, employers should make this explicit in writing and avoid conduct that suggests permanence.

2. Implied variation, custom and practice and withdrawal risk

Implied terms can arise through custom and practice. If remote working is allowed on a widespread and long-standing basis, with no indication that it is temporary, employees may argue that remote work has become an implied contractual right. This can significantly limit an employer’s ability to require a return to the office, even where business needs change. The risk is particularly high where remote working was introduced during the pandemic and then allowed to continue without formal review.

Employers that attempt to withdraw remote working without consultation in these circumstances risk claims for breach of contract. In some cases, an employee may resign and claim constructive dismissal if the withdrawal is handled in a way that amounts to a fundamental breach of contract or undermines the implied term of mutual trust and confidence.

3. Mobility clauses and flexibility clauses

Mobility clauses require careful handling in a remote work context. A broadly drafted mobility clause may allow an employer to require attendance at different locations, but tribunals interpret such clauses restrictively. They must be exercised reasonably and cannot be used in a way that undermines trust and confidence. A mobility clause will not automatically allow an employer to reverse a long-standing remote working arrangement if doing so would be unreasonable in the circumstances.

Employers should also consider the interaction between remote working and flexibility clauses. Some contracts include wording that allows the employer to vary working arrangements to meet business needs. While such clauses can provide useful flexibility, they do not give employers carte blanche to impose significant changes without consultation. A unilateral attempt to withdraw remote working may expose the employer to breach of contract or constructive dismissal claims if not handled carefully.

4. Imposing changes and dismissal and re-engagement risk

Where employees do not agree to changes, employers sometimes consider dismissal and re-engagement to impose new contractual terms. This approach carries heightened legal and reputational risk and should be treated as a last resort. Employers should take legal advice before pursuing dismissal and re-engagement, ensure consultation is meaningful, and consider alternative solutions to avoid avoidable disputes and potential claims.

Section B summary
Remote working arrangements must be grounded in clear contractual terms. Employers that fail to document remote work or allow informal arrangements to persist risk creating implied contractual rights. Any change to place of work should be approached as a potential contract variation, requiring careful communication, consultation and, in many cases, employee agreement.

Section C: Flexible Working, Equality Law and Statutory Rights

Remote work is closely connected to the statutory flexible working regime, but it is important for employers to understand that the two are not the same. Flexible working is a legal process governed by statute, whereas remote work is a potential outcome of that process. Confusing the two can lead to procedural errors and increased legal risk.

Under the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023, employees in the UK have the right to request flexible working from the first day of employment. A flexible working request may relate to the hours an employee works, the times they work, or the place where work is carried out. Requests to work remotely, either full-time or on a hybrid basis, therefore fall within the scope of the legislation. Employees may make up to two statutory flexible working requests in any 12-month period.

1. Handling flexible working requests lawfully

Employers are required to deal with flexible working requests in a reasonable manner. This includes consulting with the employee before making a decision and reaching a decision within the statutory timeframe. While employers are not required to agree to every request, any refusal must be based on one or more of the statutory grounds, such as the burden of additional costs, detrimental impact on performance or quality, inability to reorganise work, insufficiency of work during proposed working times, or adverse impact on customer demand. Decisions should be evidence-based rather than driven by generalised concerns about remote working.

2. Equality law and indirect discrimination risk

Equality law adds a further layer of complexity. A refusal to allow remote working may amount to indirect discrimination if it places employees with a protected characteristic at a particular disadvantage. This risk commonly arises in relation to sex discrimination, where women with childcare responsibilities may be disproportionately affected, and disability discrimination, where remote work may constitute a reasonable adjustment. In such cases, employers must be able to demonstrate that their decision is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate business aim.

Employers should be particularly careful where a role can be performed remotely but a policy requires office attendance without a clear evidence base. Blanket policies that require all employees to attend the workplace may appear neutral but can carry indirect discrimination risk if they fail to account for differing employee circumstances.

3. Reasonable adjustments and disability-related requests

Employers should distinguish between flexible working requests and reasonable adjustments. Where an employee’s request to work remotely is linked to a disability, the employer’s obligations under the Equality Act 2010 go beyond the flexible working framework. The duty to make reasonable adjustments may require an employer to agree to remote working even where it would otherwise be refused under the flexible working regime, unless doing so would be unreasonable in the circumstances.

Employers should take a structured approach, including obtaining appropriate information about the impact of the disability on the employee, considering alternatives, and documenting the rationale for any decision. This helps demonstrate compliance and reduces dispute risk.

4. Consistency, fairness and objective justification

Consistency of treatment is critical. Employers that allow remote work for some roles or individuals but not others must be able to justify the distinction. This does not require identical outcomes, but it does require transparent decision-making and objective criteria. Where remote work arrangements differ across teams, employers should be able to explain the business reasons, operational requirements or role-specific factors that support the distinction.

Section C summary
Remote work requests are often made through the flexible working framework, but employers must also consider their wider obligations under equality law. Lawful decision-making requires consultation, evidence-based reasoning and careful consideration of indirect discrimination and reasonable adjustment duties. Failure to take these factors into account can expose employers to tribunal claims even where the flexible working process itself has been followed.

Section D: Health and Safety, Duty of Care and Working Time Compliance

Employers retain full health and safety responsibilities for employees who work remotely. The fact that work is carried out away from the employer’s premises does not reduce the statutory duty owed to employees under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. Remote working arrangements must therefore be managed with the same degree of care as on-site working, adapted to the realities of a remote environment.

Under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, employers are required to assess risks to employee health and safety and implement appropriate control measures. In a remote working context, this will usually involve conducting workstation and display screen equipment risk assessments, identifying risks linked to prolonged screen use, poor posture and inadequate working conditions. Employers commonly rely on employee self-assessment for home workstations, but they remain responsible for reviewing assessments and addressing any issues identified.

1. Physical safety and workstation compliance

Remote working can create practical issues around workspace suitability, equipment provision and safe working habits. Employers should provide clear guidance on workstation setup, encourage regular breaks, and ensure employees have the equipment needed to work safely. Where issues are identified, employers should take reasonable steps to address them, which may include providing equipment or agreeing alternative arrangements.

2. Stress, mental wellbeing and duty of care

Duty of care extends beyond physical safety. Remote working can increase the risk of stress, isolation and mental health issues, particularly where employees experience blurred boundaries between work and personal life. Employers should take reasonable steps to monitor workload, ensure rest breaks are taken and provide access to wellbeing support. Managers should be trained to recognise signs of burnout or disengagement among remote workers, even where day-to-day contact is limited.

A failure to manage excessive workload and stress risk can also undermine an employer’s ability to defend stress-related personal injury claims, particularly where foreseeable risk indicators are ignored.

3. Working time, rest breaks and recording hours

Working time compliance presents practical challenges in a remote working environment. Employers remain responsible for ensuring that employees do not exceed the 48-hour average weekly working limit, unless a valid opt-out is in place, and that daily and weekly rest requirements are met. This obligation applies regardless of whether work is carried out at home or elsewhere. Clear expectations around working hours, availability and overtime are essential to demonstrating compliance.

Remote work can also create issues around the recording of working time. Employers should implement reasonable systems for monitoring hours worked, particularly where employees work flexibly. A failure to manage working time properly can lead to claims for unpaid wages, breach of working time regulations or, in more serious cases, health and safety enforcement consequences.

Section D summary
Health and safety and working time obligations apply fully to remote workers. Employers must assess and manage risks associated with remote working environments, including physical safety, mental wellbeing and excessive working hours. A structured and proactive approach is essential to meeting statutory duties and reducing legal exposure.

Section E: Data Protection, Monitoring and Surveillance of Remote Workers

Remote working arrangements significantly increase data protection and confidentiality risks for employers. Employees working remotely often access personal data, confidential information and business systems outside controlled workplace environments. This makes compliance with UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 a central consideration in any remote working model.

Employers remain data controllers for personal data processed by remote workers and are responsible for ensuring that processing is lawful, secure and transparent. Remote working does not reduce this responsibility. Employers must implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to protect personal data accessed or processed remotely, including secure networks, encryption, access controls and clear rules on the use of personal devices. In employment contexts, employers should also ensure their approach aligns with the additional safeguards expected when processing employee data, including the UK GDPR framework for employment-related processing.

1. Lawful processing and security measures

Employers should ensure remote access is controlled and secure, including the use of multi-factor authentication, secure remote connections and appropriate device management. Remote working policies should address how personal data is handled in home environments, including storage, printing, disposal and confidentiality. Employers should also ensure employees understand the importance of preventing unauthorised access by household members or third parties.

2. Monitoring remote workers lawfully

Monitoring of remote workers is a particularly sensitive area. Employers may wish to monitor performance, system usage or working time, but any monitoring must comply with data protection principles. Monitoring must be necessary, proportionate and transparent, and employees must be informed about what monitoring takes place, the purpose of monitoring and how data will be used. Covert monitoring will only be justified in exceptional circumstances and carries a high legal risk.

The Information Commissioner’s Office expects employers to carry out data protection impact assessments where monitoring is likely to be intrusive or systematic. This is particularly relevant where software is used to track keystrokes, screen activity or online behaviour. Employers should carefully assess whether such measures are genuinely necessary or whether less intrusive alternatives are available.

3. Managing data breaches and incident reporting

Remote working increases the risk of data breaches, including accidental disclosure, loss of devices or unauthorised access to systems. Employers should have clear incident reporting procedures in place and ensure that remote workers are trained to recognise and report potential breaches promptly. Failure to manage these risks can result in regulatory enforcement action, financial penalties and reputational damage.

Section E summary
Remote work heightens data protection and monitoring risks. Employers must ensure that any monitoring of remote workers is lawful, proportionate and transparent, and that robust technical and organisational measures are in place to protect personal data accessed outside the workplace.

Section F: Policies, Governance and Management Controls

Remote work cannot be managed effectively through contracts alone. While contractual terms establish the legal framework, day-to-day compliance depends on clear policies, governance structures and management controls. Employers that rely on informal arrangements or ad hoc decision-making are more likely to encounter inconsistency, disputes and legal exposure.

A dedicated remote working policy is strongly advisable where remote work is widespread or permanent. This policy should sit alongside, and cross-reference, other core workplace policies, including flexible working, health and safety, data protection, IT usage, disciplinary and absence management policies. The purpose of a remote working policy is not simply to permit remote work, but to define the conditions under which it operates and the standards expected of remote workers.

1. What a remote working policy should cover

Key areas that should be addressed include eligibility for remote work, approval processes, expectations around availability and communication, working hours, performance standards and review arrangements. Policies should also make clear whether remote working is contractual, discretionary or subject to review. Where employers wish to retain flexibility, this should be stated explicitly. Policies should align with contractual terms and avoid wording that unintentionally creates contractual rights where none are intended.

2. Governance and consistency of decision-making

Governance is particularly important where different parts of the business adopt different approaches to remote work. Inconsistent application of remote working arrangements can give rise to discrimination claims and employee relations issues. Employers should ensure that decisions about remote work are made using consistent criteria and are capable of objective justification. This does not require identical outcomes for all employees, but it does require transparency and fairness in decision-making.

3. Management capability and supervision

Management capability is a critical factor. Managing remote workers requires different skills from managing on-site teams. Employers should ensure that managers are trained to supervise remote staff effectively, including setting clear objectives, monitoring performance appropriately, managing wellbeing and handling issues promptly. A lack of management oversight can lead to performance problems being overlooked, only to surface later as disciplinary or capability issues.

4. Review mechanisms and ending remote work arrangements

Remote working policies should address review and termination of arrangements. Employers should retain the ability to review remote working arrangements periodically and to amend or withdraw them where business needs change. Clear review mechanisms reduce the risk of disputes when arrangements are no longer workable and support lawful decision-making.

Section F summary
Effective remote working depends on strong policy frameworks and governance, not informal practices. Employers should implement clear remote working policies, ensure consistent decision-making and equip managers with the skills needed to manage remote teams lawfully and effectively. Poor governance is a common source of legal and employee relations risk in remote working arrangements.

Section G: Managing Disputes, Withdrawal of Remote Work and Exit Risk

Even where remote working arrangements are implemented carefully, disputes can still arise. Changes in business needs, performance concerns or breakdowns in working relationships may lead an employer to reconsider or withdraw remote work. How this is handled is critical to managing legal risk.

Disputes commonly arise where employees believe remote working has become a contractual right. This is particularly likely where arrangements have been in place for a long period without review or where remote working was introduced as a temporary measure but allowed to continue indefinitely. Employers that attempt to withdraw remote working in these circumstances without consultation risk claims for breach of contract or constructive dismissal.

1. Withdrawal and variation: consultation and fairness

A decision to require a remote worker to return to the workplace should be approached as a change to terms and conditions unless the contract clearly allows for such a change. Employers should consult with affected employees, explain the business rationale and consider alternatives. A failure to consult meaningfully can undermine the employer’s position even where there are legitimate operational reasons for change.

Where an employer ultimately dismisses an employee for refusing to accept a change to working location, failure to consult properly may also undermine the fairness of any dismissal for some other substantial reason.

2. Grievances, discrimination allegations and evidence

Remote work can become a focal point in grievance proceedings. Employees may raise grievances alleging unfair treatment, inconsistency or discrimination in how remote work arrangements are applied. Employers should ensure that grievances relating to remote working are handled in line with internal procedures and that decisions are supported by evidence and objective reasoning.

3. Performance, capability and avoiding punitive withdrawal

Performance and conduct issues can be more difficult to identify and manage in a remote working environment. Where remote working contributes to performance concerns, employers should avoid using withdrawal of remote work as a punitive measure. Concerns should be addressed through clear objectives, support and, where necessary, capability procedures. A sudden withdrawal of remote working framed as punishment may be viewed unfavourably and can increase constructive dismissal risk.

4. Redundancy and restructuring where staff are remote

Remote working arrangements can intersect with redundancy and restructuring exercises. Employers may need to consider whether remote roles remain viable, whether a return to the workplace is required, and how selection criteria are applied. Care must be taken to ensure that remote workers are not indirectly disadvantaged in redundancy processes, for example through reduced visibility, assumptions about availability or reduced access to development opportunities.

Section G summary
Withdrawing or changing remote working arrangements carries significant legal risk if not handled carefully. Employers should treat changes as potential contractual variations, consult meaningfully and manage disputes through established procedures. A structured approach reduces the risk of claims for breach of contract, constructive dismissal and discrimination.

FAQs

1. Is remote work a legal right in the UK?

Remote work is not a standalone legal right. Employees have a statutory right to request flexible working from day one of employment, which may include a request to work remotely. Employers may lawfully refuse such requests provided the decision is based on one or more statutory grounds and the process has been followed correctly.

2. Can an employer require a remote worker to return to the office?

This depends on the employment contract and how the remote working arrangement was agreed. If remote work is discretionary or temporary, an employer may be able to require a return to the workplace with reasonable notice. Where remote work has become contractual, withdrawal will usually require consultation and employee agreement.

3. Does health and safety law apply to employees working remotely?

Yes. Employers owe the same health and safety duties to remote workers as to office-based staff. This includes assessing risks associated with home or remote working environments and taking reasonable steps to protect physical and mental wellbeing.

4. Can remote workers be monitored by their employer?

Employers may monitor remote workers, but monitoring must be proportionate, transparent and compliant with UK GDPR and data protection law. Employees must be informed about monitoring activity, and intrusive or covert monitoring will only be lawful in exceptional circumstances.

5. What are the risks of allowing employees to work remotely overseas?

Overseas remote working can create significant risks, including immigration breaches, PAYE and social security liabilities, permanent establishment exposure and conflicting employment law obligations. Employers should not permit overseas remote working without a full legal and tax assessment.

6. Is remote work a reasonable adjustment for disabled employees?

It can be. Where an employee’s disability places them at a disadvantage, remote working may constitute a reasonable adjustment under the Equality Act 2010. Employers must consider this separately from the flexible working framework and cannot refuse solely on the basis of standard flexible working criteria.

Conclusion

Remote work is now embedded in the UK employment landscape, but its widespread adoption has not simplified the legal position for employers. On the contrary, remote working arrangements often increase legal complexity by blurring traditional assumptions about place of work, supervision and control. Employers that treat remote work as an informal or purely operational decision risk exposing themselves to contractual disputes, discrimination claims and regulatory scrutiny.

For business owners and HR professionals, the legal challenge is to ensure that remote working is underpinned by clear contractual terms, supported by robust policies and managed consistently across the organisation. Flexible working requests must be handled lawfully, equality and reasonable adjustment duties must be properly considered, and health and safety, working time and data protection obligations must be actively managed rather than assumed away.

Remote work can deliver significant benefits for both employers and employees, but only where it is implemented within a clear legal and governance framework. A proactive approach, grounded in documentation, consultation and ongoing review, allows employers to retain flexibility while protecting the business from avoidable legal risk.

Glossary

Useful Links