Flexible Working Consultation Opens Under ERA 2025

Picture of Anne Morris

Anne Morris

Employer Solutions Lawyer

Committed to excellence:

Committed to excellence:

Committed to excellence:

Key Takeaways

 

  • Flexible working consultation runs to 30 April 2026.
  • Consultation forms part of wider preparatory stages of Employment Rights Act 2025 implementation.
  • Current flexible working rules and guidance remain in force until new provisons formally take effect.

 

The Government has launched a new consultation on improving access to flexible working as part of the implementation programme for the Employment Rights Act 2025. The consultation, led by the Department for Business and Trade, focuses on how forthcoming flexible working reforms should operate in practice once legally effecive.

The law on flexible working has not yet changed. This consultation seeks views on how a new statutory framework should be applied by employers and enforced in real workplace settings.

The consultation closes at 11:59pm on 30 April 2026.

SECTION GUIDE

 

Flexible working position under the Employment Rights Act 2025

 

The Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a revised framework for handling flexible working requests. The legislation moves the regime away from a purely request-based model and towards a more structured decision-making process.

Provision is made for employers to consult with employees before refusing a flexible working request and to explain why any refusal is reasonable in the circumstances. These principles are set out in primary legislation, but the detailed procedural mechanics have not yet been specified.

Commencement dates and supporting regulations remain outstanding.

 

Scope of the consultation

 

The consultation focuses on how the new statutory framework should be applied in practice. Views are being sought on the level of engagement expected before a request can be refused and how employers should demonstrate that refusal decisions are reasonable.

Consideration is also being given to how requests should be handled where immediate agreement is not possible. Options under discussion include staged consideration, temporary arrangements and trial periods.

The consultation does not revisit the underlying policy decision to retain an employer right to refuse flexible working requests.

 

Legal position during the consultation period

 

Publication of the consultation does not alter the current flexible working regime. No new statutory duties arise until the relevant provisions of the Employment Rights Act 2025 are commenced and supported by secondary legislation or guidance.

Employers remain subject to the existing statutory framework and associated ACAS guidance. Any suggestion that consultation obligations already apply would be incorrect.

 

Next steps

 

The consultation remains open until 30 April 2026. A Government response is expected to follow, setting out the final approach to consultation requirements and refusal processes.

Only after that stage will commencement dates, regulatory detail and enforcement expectations become clear. Until then, the consultation should be treated as a policy development to monitor rather than a change requiring operational implementation.

 

 

 

DMS Perspective

 

 

The Employment Rights Act 2025 places increasing weight on demonstrable process across employment decision-making and flexible working sits squarely within that framework.

The consultation points to tighter procedural scrutiny of flexible working decisions. Decision-making will attract closer examination where records show limited engagement, no meaningful consideration of alternatives or weak explanation of reasoning. Employers who rely on informal handling or formulaic refusals are unlikely to withstand challenge once the new regime takes effect.

No immediate policy changes are required. However, flexible working arrangements that depend on minimal documentation or delegated decisions without oversight are likely to create risk under any such new regime.

Employers handling high volumes of requests, operating decentralised management models or managing existing dispute exposure should assess whether current practices would satisfy a consultation-based standard when implemented.

At this stage, employers should focus on awareness rather than operational change.

 

 

 

 

 

About our Expert

Picture of Anne Morris

Anne Morris

Founder and Managing Director Anne Morris is a fully qualified solicitor and trusted adviser to large corporates through to SMEs, providing strategic immigration and global mobility advice to support employers with UK operations to meet their workforce needs through corporate immigration.She is recognised by Legal 500 and Chambers as a legal expert and delivers Board-level advice on business migration and compliance risk management as well as overseeing the firm’s development of new client propositions and delivery of cost and time efficient processing of applications.Anne is an active public speaker, immigration commentator, and immigration policy contributor and regularly hosts training sessions for employers and HR professionals.
Picture of Anne Morris

Anne Morris

Founder and Managing Director Anne Morris is a fully qualified solicitor and trusted adviser to large corporates through to SMEs, providing strategic immigration and global mobility advice to support employers with UK operations to meet their workforce needs through corporate immigration.She is recognised by Legal 500 and Chambers as a legal expert and delivers Board-level advice on business migration and compliance risk management as well as overseeing the firm’s development of new client propositions and delivery of cost and time efficient processing of applications.Anne is an active public speaker, immigration commentator, and immigration policy contributor and regularly hosts training sessions for employers and HR professionals.

Explore Further

Legal Disclaimer

The matters contained in this article are intended to be for general information purposes only. This article does not constitute legal advice, nor is it a complete or authoritative statement of the law, and should not be treated as such. Whilst every effort is made to ensure that the information is correct at the time of writing, no warranty, express or implied, is given as to its accuracy and no liability is accepted for any error or omission. Before acting on any of the information contained herein, expert legal advice should be sought.