Authorising Officer: Sponsor Licence Duties & Requirements

Authorising Officer: At a Glance

Every UK sponsor licence requires an eligible Authorising Officer with senior responsibility for the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements. The role sits at the centre of sponsor governance, with responsibility for ensuring that appropriate systems, people and controls are in place to manage the organisation’s sponsor duties.

The Authorising Officer should be the most senior person responsible for the recruitment of sponsored workers and for sponsor compliance. Where the organisation does not recruit sponsored workers directly, the role should instead be held by the most senior person responsible for the organisation’s activities as a licensed sponsor.

Employers therefore need to assess both eligibility and practical suitability. The individual must satisfy the Home Office requirements for key personnel and have sufficient seniority, authority and organisational visibility to exercise effective oversight of sponsorship activity.

Day-to-day administration can be delegated to HR, recruitment teams, Level 1 Users and other appropriate personnel. The employer remains responsible for compliance, with the Authorising Officer providing the senior oversight needed to keep sponsorship activity controlled.

 

 

Section A: What is a Sponsor Licence Authorising Officer?

 

The Authorising Officer is a mandatory sponsor licence key personnel role and provides senior responsibility for the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements.

The principal sponsor management roles are:

 

• Authorising Officer
• Key Contact
• Level 1 User

 

The same eligible individual can hold more than one of these roles where they satisfy the requirements applying to each appointment. In a smaller organisation, for example, the Authorising Officer may also act as the Key Contact and Level 1 User. Larger sponsors are more likely to divide these responsibilities between several people.

A sponsor can have only one Authorising Officer at any given time.

The appointment must also be maintained throughout the life of the sponsor licence. Employers therefore need to treat the role as a continuing governance requirement, with succession arrangements in place where the Authorising Officer leaves, becomes ineligible or can no longer perform the role effectively.

The Home Office also requires the sponsor to maintain at least one eligible Level 1 User throughout the life of the licence. Current sponsor guidance states that where a sponsor does not have both an eligible Authorising Officer and at least one eligible Level 1 User, the Home Office will revoke the sponsor licence.

Where the Authorising Officer changes, the sponsor needs to appoint an eligible replacement and update the Home Office through the current Sponsor Management System process.

 

1. What does the Authorising Officer do?

 

The Authorising Officer provides senior oversight of the systems, people and processes used to manage the sponsor licence.

The sponsor duties themselves remain duties of the licensed organisation. The Authorising Officer is responsible for ensuring that the organisation has appropriate controls in place to meet those duties and that sponsorship activity is subject to effective oversight.

This can include ensuring that appropriate arrangements are in place for:

 

• managing sponsored workers;
• complying with sponsor reporting duties;
• maintaining required records;
• controlling access to the Sponsor Management System (SMS);
• overseeing the activities of SMS users;
• ensuring Certificates of Sponsorship are assigned appropriately;
• identifying and escalating sponsorship compliance issues;
• ensuring relevant changes are reported to the Home Office; and
• maintaining effective sponsorship processes across the organisation.

 

The Authorising Officer does not need to perform each sponsorship task personally. Routine SMS administration may be carried out by an HR manager or Level 1 User, while recruitment, payroll, line management and external advisers may also feed into the wider sponsorship process.

The employer should nevertheless be able to demonstrate that delegated activity remains subject to senior oversight and that the Authorising Officer has sufficient visibility to identify problems, require corrective action and ensure that sponsorship controls remain effective.

 

2. Is an Authorising Officer mandatory?

 

Yes.

An organisation applying for a sponsor licence has to nominate an eligible Authorising Officer. Failure to nominate someone who meets the relevant requirements can result in the sponsor licence application being refused.

The requirement continues after the licence has been granted. Sponsors need to maintain an eligible Authorising Officer and at least one eligible Level 1 User throughout the life of the licence.

Current sponsor guidance states that where a sponsor ceases to have an eligible Authorising Officer and at least one eligible Level 1 User, the Home Office will revoke the licence.

Separately, where there is no longer a suitable and eligible Authorising Officer, or the sponsor fails to notify the Home Office of a relevant Authorising Officer change, the guidance states that the Home Office will normally revoke the licence.

Employers should therefore plan for absence, resignation, internal moves and organisational change before they create a gap in senior sponsorship oversight or key personnel coverage.

 

3. Is the Authorising Officer personally responsible for the sponsor licence?

 

The sponsor licence is held by the organisation. The organisation remains responsible for complying with its sponsor duties and for activity carried out by those authorised to operate the licence on its behalf.

The Authorising Officer occupies the senior governance role within that structure. The Home Office requires the sponsor to nominate a sufficiently senior person to take responsibility for sponsorship activity, including oversight of those given access to the SMS.

Employers should therefore avoid nominal appointments. The Authorising Officer should have genuine authority, sufficient visibility of sponsorship activity and the ability to intervene where compliance concerns arise.

For employers, the relevant question is:

“Who within the organisation has the seniority, authority and oversight to take effective responsibility for our sponsor licence?”

 

 

Back to top

 

Section B: Who Can Be an Authorising Officer?

 

 

The Authorising Officer has to satisfy both the general requirements that apply to sponsor licence key personnel and the specific requirements that apply to the Authorising Officer role.

As a starting point, the Authorising Officer should normally be a paid member of staff or an office holder within the sponsoring organisation. An external immigration adviser or other representative cannot ordinarily be appointed simply to take responsibility for the licence on the employer’s behalf.

The individual must also be sufficiently senior within the organisation.

Home Office sponsor guidance requires the Authorising Officer to be the most senior person responsible for the recruitment of all sponsored workers and for ensuring that the organisation meets its sponsor duties.

Where the organisation does not recruit sponsored workers, the Authorising Officer should instead be the most senior person responsible for the organisation’s activities as a licensed sponsor.

This does not necessarily mean that the Authorising Officer has to be the chief executive, managing director or business owner. The appropriate person will depend on how responsibility for recruitment and sponsorship is structured within the organisation.

For example, an HR Director may be a more appropriate Authorising Officer than the Chief Executive where the HR Director has senior responsibility for recruitment, immigration compliance and sponsorship across the organisation.

The important issue is whether the person has the authority and organisational responsibility required by the role, rather than simply their job title.

 

1. Authorising Officer eligibility requirements

 

When selecting an Authorising Officer, employers should consider whether the proposed individual meets the applicable Home Office requirements.

Depending on the circumstances, relevant requirements include whether the individual:

 

• is appropriately senior within the organisation;
• is responsible for sponsored-worker recruitment and sponsor compliance;
• is a paid member of staff or an office holder;
• is based in the UK for the period in which they fill the role, subject to limited exceptions;
• has a valid National Insurance number where one is required;
• has an appropriate relationship with the sponsoring organisation;
• satisfies the Home Office suitability requirements applying to key personnel;
• is not subject to circumstances that make them unsuitable to act as key personnel; and
• is capable of exercising effective oversight of the organisation’s sponsorship activities.

 

The employer should assess these requirements before nominating the individual rather than assuming that seniority alone makes someone eligible.

 

2. Does the Authorising Officer have to be a director?

 

No. There is no general requirement for the Authorising Officer to be a company director.

A director can act as the Authorising Officer where they satisfy the relevant requirements and are the appropriate senior person responsible for sponsorship.

However, other senior employees or office holders can also perform the role.

Depending on the organisation’s structure, this could include a:

 

• HR Director;
• Head of HR;
• People Director;
• senior recruitment professional;
• senior operations manager;
• managing partner;
• partner;
• company director; or
• business owner.

 

The job title itself is not decisive.

The Home Office will be concerned with the individual’s actual position and responsibilities within the organisation.

This is particularly relevant for larger employers where the Chief Executive or board members may have greater overall corporate seniority but little direct responsibility for recruitment or sponsorship compliance.

 

3. Can an HR manager be the Authorising Officer?

 

Potentially, yes.

An HR manager may be suitable where they are sufficiently senior and have the required responsibility for sponsored-worker recruitment and compliance with sponsor duties.

Employers should, however, distinguish between operational involvement and senior responsibility.

A relatively junior HR employee who processes visa documentation and uses the SMS may have extensive practical knowledge of sponsorship but may not have sufficient seniority or organisational authority to satisfy the Authorising Officer requirements.

Conversely, appointing an extremely senior executive who has virtually no knowledge of the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements can create practical compliance weaknesses even if that individual otherwise satisfies the formal eligibility requirements.

The strongest appointment will usually combine appropriate seniority with sufficient knowledge, authority and access to information to exercise genuine oversight.

 

4. Can a business owner be the Authorising Officer?

 

Yes, provided the individual satisfies the relevant requirements.

For owner-managed businesses, it is common for a director or owner to hold more than one key personnel role. The same person may, for example, act as:

 

• Authorising Officer;
• Key Contact; and
• Level 1 User.

 

This can provide a straightforward structure for a smaller sponsor, but it also creates a potential single-person dependency.

If that individual becomes unavailable, leaves the business or becomes ineligible to act as key personnel, several important sponsor licence functions can be affected at the same time.

Smaller employers should therefore consider continuity arrangements even where one individual legitimately performs several sponsorship roles.

 

5. Can a sponsored worker be an Authorising Officer?

 

Yes, potentially. A sponsored worker is not automatically prohibited from acting as an Authorising Officer.

They must, however, independently satisfy all of the general key personnel requirements and the specific eligibility requirements that apply to the Authorising Officer role.

The employer should therefore consider matters such as:

 

• the individual’s immigration status;
• their position within the organisation;
• their seniority;
• their responsibility for sponsored-worker recruitment and sponsor compliance;
• their UK presence;
• their relationship with the sponsoring organisation; and
• the wider suitability requirements applying to key personnel.

 

There can also be additional governance considerations where a sponsor proposes to place significant control over its sponsor licence in the hands of an individual whose own immigration status depends on that organisation.

The appointment should therefore be assessed against the current sponsor guidance and the individual’s actual position within the organisation rather than relying on a general assumption that sponsored workers are either eligible or ineligible.

 

6. Does the Authorising Officer have to be based in the UK?

 

As a general rule, key personnel must be based in the UK for the period in which they fill the role.

This means employers should take particular care where senior HR, recruitment or management functions are located overseas.

A multinational group should not assume that a senior employee working for an overseas parent company can be appointed as the Authorising Officer for the UK sponsor merely because they have group-wide responsibility for recruitment or mobility.

The individual also has to satisfy the requirements concerning their relationship with the licensed organisation.

There are specific provisions for the UK Expansion Worker route where an overseas business is establishing its UK presence and does not yet have suitable UK-based staff. Those cases need to be considered under the rules applying to that route rather than the normal position for an established UK sponsor.

 

7. Can an immigration solicitor or external adviser be the Authorising Officer?

 

Normally, no.

An immigration solicitor, regulated immigration adviser, external HR consultant or other professional representative cannot ordinarily be appointed as the Authorising Officer simply because they manage the organisation’s immigration work.

The Authorising Officer is intended to provide senior internal ownership of sponsorship compliance.

External advisers can provide substantial support. They may advise on sponsor duties, assist with applications, review compliance systems, provide training, help prepare reports and support the organisation in its use of the SMS where permitted.

What an adviser cannot ordinarily do is replace the employer’s own responsibility for its sponsor licence by becoming the organisation’s Authorising Officer.

There are limited exceptions in particular circumstances, including certain insolvency or administration situations, but these should not be treated as the normal model for managing a sponsor licence.

The distinction is important for employers using outsourced immigration support:

sponsorship administration and professional advice can be outsourced to an appropriate extent; ownership of sponsor compliance cannot simply be outsourced with it.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section C: Who Cannot Be an Authorising Officer?

 

 

Not every senior employee or office holder will be eligible to act as an Authorising Officer.

The Authorising Officer is part of the sponsor’s key personnel, meaning the individual has to satisfy the Home Office’s general suitability and eligibility requirements as well as the specific requirements of the Authorising Officer role.

This allows the Home Office to consider not only the individual’s current position within the organisation, but also relevant matters such as their immigration status, criminal history, previous involvement with sponsor licences and wider compliance record.

An employer should therefore carry out appropriate checks before nominating an Authorising Officer.

 

1. Contractors and consultants

 

The Authorising Officer must normally be a paid member of staff or an office holder within the sponsoring organisation.

A contractor or consultant engaged specifically to undertake a sponsorship-related role will not normally satisfy the requirements simply because they have been given responsibility for immigration compliance.

This is particularly important where employers outsource immigration, HR or recruitment functions.

An external adviser may perform substantial work supporting the sponsor, but the organisation still needs an eligible individual within the business to hold the Authorising Officer role.

There are limited exceptions in specific circumstances, such as certain insolvency or administration arrangements, but employers should not structure their sponsorship arrangements on the assumption that an external consultant can act as their Authorising Officer.

 

2. Individuals who do not have sufficient seniority

 

A person may understand the Sponsor Management System extremely well but still be inappropriate for appointment as the Authorising Officer.

For example, an HR administrator may:

 

• prepare Certificate of Sponsorship requests;
• maintain sponsored-worker records;
• monitor visa expiry dates;
• prepare Home Office reports;
• use the SMS regularly; and
• understand the practical sponsorship process better than senior management.

 

That does not necessarily make them the appropriate Authorising Officer.

The Home Office requirement focuses on the most senior person responsible for the recruitment of sponsored workers and ensuring compliance with sponsor duties.

The Authorising Officer therefore needs genuine organisational authority.

Operational expertise can sit with other members of the sponsorship team, particularly Level 1 Users, while senior responsibility and oversight sit with the Authorising Officer.

 

3. Individuals who are not sufficiently connected to the sponsor

 

Employers also need to consider the individual’s relationship with the organisation holding the sponsor licence.

The Authorising Officer cannot ordinarily be someone from another organisation merely because the businesses are connected.

This can become particularly important within corporate groups.

A group HR Director, for example, may have responsibility for recruitment across several companies, but this does not automatically mean that they can act as Authorising Officer for every licensed entity within the group.

The eligibility of key personnel needs to be considered by reference to the organisation that actually holds the sponsor licence and the applicable Home Office requirements.

Employers operating group structures should therefore avoid assuming that corporate control, common ownership or a shared HR function automatically makes an individual eligible to act for every sponsor within the group.

 

4. Criminal convictions and compliance history

 

The Home Office can take criminality and previous compliance history into account when assessing whether proposed key personnel are suitable.

Certain criminal convictions and other conduct can prevent an individual from satisfying the applicable suitability requirements. The effect of a particular conviction or compliance issue depends on the nature of the matter, the circumstances and the current Home Office sponsor guidance.

Relevant issues can include previous involvement with:

 

• serious sponsor compliance failures;
• illegal working;
• civil penalties;
• immigration offences;
• fraud or dishonesty;
• criminal conduct relevant to the suitability requirements; and
• other conduct relevant to the integrity of the sponsorship system.

 

Employers should therefore avoid treating key personnel checks as a simple confirmation of job title and employment status.

Where a proposed Authorising Officer has a complicated immigration, regulatory, criminal or previous sponsorship history, eligibility should be checked against the current Home Office suitability provisions before the sponsor licence application or appointment is made.

 

5. Previous involvement with another sponsor

 

Previous involvement with another sponsor does not, by itself, make someone unsuitable to act as an Authorising Officer.

The potential issue is the nature and timing of that involvement.

The Home Office suitability provisions contain specific circumstances in which previous involvement with another sponsor, including certain cases involving sponsor licence refusal or revocation, can affect whether a person is suitable to act as key personnel.

The applicable consequences and relevant look-back periods depend on the particular circumstances.

Employers should therefore not assume that any historical association with a sponsor that experienced compliance action automatically prevents appointment.

Equally, previous involvement in serious sponsorship failures should not be ignored.

This is particularly relevant when recruiting senior HR, recruitment or management personnel who previously held key personnel roles for another sponsor.

Where there is relevant previous sponsorship history, the employer should check the current Home Office key personnel suitability requirements before making the appointment.

 

6. Immigration status and UK presence

 

The proposed Authorising Officer must satisfy the applicable requirements relating to immigration status and presence in the UK.

As a general rule, key personnel must be based in the UK for the period in which they fill the role, subject to specific exceptions such as those applying in certain UK Expansion Worker circumstances.

Employers should not assume that an individual is eligible merely because they are lawfully working for the organisation.

A sponsored worker is not automatically prohibited from acting as an Authorising Officer, but they must independently satisfy all of the general key personnel requirements and the specific requirements applying to the Authorising Officer role.

The individual’s circumstances therefore need to be considered against the current key personnel requirements.

This becomes particularly important where the proposed Authorising Officer:

 

• has time-limited immigration permission;
• is themselves a sponsored worker;
• spends substantial periods outside the UK;
• is primarily employed overseas;
• has recently moved to the UK;
• works across several group companies; or
• has an immigration history that could raise suitability concerns.

 

The appropriate assessment is fact-specific.

 

7. Bankruptcy, director disqualification and other suitability concerns

 

The Home Office’s suitability requirements for key personnel can extend beyond immigration compliance.

Depending on the circumstances, issues involving bankruptcy restrictions, director disqualification or other relevant regulatory history can affect whether an individual is suitable to act as key personnel.

This reflects the level of trust placed in those responsible for operating the sponsorship system.

The precise effect of any such issue should be assessed against the current Home Office suitability requirements rather than assuming that every historical financial or regulatory matter automatically prevents appointment.

Where there is uncertainty, the employer should establish the individual’s eligibility before formally nominating them.

 

8. A technically eligible appointment can still be a poor appointment

 

Home Office eligibility should be treated as the minimum threshold, rather than the complete test of whether someone should become the Authorising Officer.

An individual could potentially satisfy the formal requirements but still be a weak choice if they:

 

• have little understanding of the sponsor licence;
• have insufficient time to oversee sponsorship;
• are disconnected from the HR or recruitment function;
• cannot access the information needed to identify compliance problems;
• do not understand what has been delegated to SMS users;
• have no system for checking that delegated tasks are being completed;
• are unlikely to remain with the organisation; or
• do not have sufficient authority to require corrective action.

 

This distinction becomes particularly important during Home Office compliance activity.

A sponsor should be able to demonstrate not merely that it has named an Authorising Officer, but that its sponsorship arrangements operate under credible senior oversight.

The strongest Authorising Officer appointment therefore combines three elements:

eligibility, authority and effective control.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section D: Authorising Officer Duties & Responsibilities

 

 

The Authorising Officer has overall responsibility for the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements, but this does not mean they have to perform every sponsor licence task personally.

In most organisations, sponsorship involves several people. HR teams may maintain records, recruitment teams may collect information, managers may monitor sponsored workers and Level 1 Users may carry out transactions through the Sponsor Management System.

The sponsor organisation remains legally responsible for complying with its sponsor duties. The Authorising Officer’s role is to provide senior oversight and ensure that appropriate systems, people and controls are in place so that those duties are met.

This distinction between doing and overseeing is central to understanding the role.

 

1. Overall responsibility for sponsorship

 

The Authorising Officer should have sufficient visibility of the organisation’s sponsorship activities to understand how the sponsor licence is being managed.

They should know:

 

• who is responsible for sponsorship administration;
• who has access to the SMS;
• how sponsored workers are recruited;
• how Certificates of Sponsorship are requested and assigned;
• how sponsor reporting duties are identified and completed;
• how sponsored-worker records are maintained;
• how absences and other relevant worker changes are monitored;
• how organisational changes are escalated;
• how potential compliance breaches are identified;
• who has authority to take corrective action.

 

The Authorising Officer does not need to personally process each of these matters.

They should, however, be able to explain how the organisation controls them.

 

2. Ensuring sponsor duties are being met

 

Holding a sponsor licence brings continuing duties that apply throughout the life of the licence.

These are duties of the licensed sponsor organisation. The Authorising Officer should provide senior oversight to ensure the organisation has effective systems for complying with them.

Depending on the organisation and the workers it sponsors, these systems can include arrangements dealing with:

 

• record keeping;
• reporting relevant changes;
• monitoring sponsored workers;
• right to work compliance;
• maintaining accurate contact information;
• monitoring attendance or engagement where relevant;
• identifying changes to sponsored roles;
• reporting changes to the sponsoring organisation;
• maintaining appropriate SMS access; and
• cooperating with Home Office compliance activity.

 

The Authorising Officer does not replace the operational processes needed to perform these tasks.

Their responsibility is to ensure that appropriate processes exist, responsibilities are allocated and failures are identified and addressed.

 

3. Oversight of sponsored-worker recruitment

 

The Authorising Officer should have appropriate oversight of the recruitment of workers who will be sponsored.

This matters because sponsorship compliance begins before a Certificate of Sponsorship is assigned.

Recruitment decisions can affect issues such as:

 

• whether the role is genuine;
• whether the role is eligible for sponsorship;
• whether the correct occupation code has been selected;
• whether salary requirements are met;
• whether the proposed working arrangements correspond with the sponsored role;
• whether information given on the Certificate of Sponsorship is accurate; and
• whether the organisation has appropriate evidence supporting the recruitment.

 

Specialist immigration assessments may be carried out by HR teams or professional advisers, but the organisation should have a clear process for ensuring that sponsorship is not used without appropriate checks and authorisation.

 

4. Oversight of sponsor reporting

 

Sponsors have to report specified changes to the Home Office, often within prescribed timescales.

The Authorising Officer should therefore ensure that the organisation has an effective system for identifying potentially reportable events and bringing them to the attention of the people responsible for assessing and completing the required report.

A common compliance risk is not that nobody knows how to submit a report through the SMS, but that the person responsible for the SMS is never told that something has changed.

For example, relevant information may sit with:

 

• payroll;
• line management;
• HR;
• recruitment;
• finance;
• company secretarial teams;
• senior management; or
• overseas group functions.

 

without reaching the person responsible for sponsor reporting.

The Authorising Officer should therefore ensure that internal escalation arrangements allow relevant information to reach the sponsorship function in sufficient time for the organisation to meet its reporting obligations.

 

5. Oversight of sponsor record keeping

 

The sponsor must maintain the records and documents required under the sponsorship system.

Responsibility for maintaining those records can be delegated, but the Authorising Officer should have confidence that the organisation’s record-keeping arrangements are effective.

This can involve ensuring there are clear processes governing:

 

• what records need to be retained;
• where sponsorship records are stored;
• who is responsible for maintaining them;
• when records should be updated;
• how missing documents are identified; and
• how information can be retrieved during a Home Office compliance check.

 

For larger employers, this can be particularly important where documents are distributed across different HR, payroll, recruitment and personnel systems.

A sponsor should be able to retrieve the required information regardless of how its internal systems are structured.

 

6. Controlling access to the Sponsor Management System

 

One of the Authorising Officer’s specific responsibilities concerns access to the Sponsor Management System (SMS).

The Authorising Officer decides how many members of staff should have access to the SMS and the level of permission that should be given to them, subject to the Home Office rules governing SMS users.

This should be treated as a governance decision rather than simply an administrative convenience.

Employers should consider:

 

• whether the individual genuinely needs SMS access;
• what level of access they require;
• whether they satisfy the relevant eligibility requirements;
• whether they understand their responsibilities;
• whether their access remains appropriate when their role changes;
• whether access should be removed when they leave or move roles; and
• whether the number of users remains proportionate to the organisation’s needs.

 

Unnecessary or poorly controlled SMS access increases the risk of incorrect or unauthorised activity taking place under the sponsor licence.

 

7. Responsibility for SMS users

 

The sponsor is responsible for the actions of individuals authorised to use the SMS on its behalf.

The Authorising Officer also has an important and specific oversight role in relation to those users.

It is therefore not sufficient simply to appoint Level 1 Users and assume that responsibility for the sponsor licence has passed to them.

The Authorising Officer should know:

 

• who currently has SMS access;
• what permissions they hold;
• what activities they perform;
• whether they have been appropriately trained;
• how their activities are monitored; and
• how errors or unusual activity are escalated.

 

This becomes especially important where several people use the SMS or where sponsorship activity is spread across different offices, departments or business units.

 

8. Monitoring activity on the SMS

 

Sponsors must have arrangements for checking the activities of their SMS users.

Current Home Office sponsor guidance specifically recommends that the Authorising Officer checks the Certificates of Sponsorship assigned to workers at least once a month.

This distinction is important. Having a system for checking SMS-user activity is part of the sponsor’s compliance requirements, while the monthly Authorising Officer review of assigned Certificates of Sponsorship is expressed by the Home Office as a recommended method of oversight.

A monthly review can help identify matters such as:

 

• unexpected Certificates of Sponsorship;
• incorrect worker details;
• unusual assignment activity;
• Certificates assigned without the expected internal approval;
• discrepancies between recruitment records and SMS activity; and
• patterns that require further investigation.

 

The monthly Certificate of Sponsorship review should not necessarily be the entirety of the organisation’s SMS controls, but it provides a useful point around which a wider oversight process can be built.

 

9. Ensuring Certificates of Sponsorship are properly controlled

 

A Certificate of Sponsorship is not simply an administrative document. Assigning one is an important act carried out under the authority of the sponsor licence.

The organisation should therefore have controls governing when and by whom Certificates can be assigned.

Depending on the employer, these may include:

 

• documented internal approval;
• checking the proposed role;
• checking salary and working arrangements;
• verifying the worker’s details;
• confirming the appropriate immigration route;
• checking the information to be entered on the CoS;
• retaining supporting evidence; and
• reviewing the assignment after it has been made.

 

The Authorising Officer should understand how these controls operate even where a Level 1 User performs the actual SMS transaction.

 

10. Identifying and escalating compliance problems

 

Effective sponsorship governance requires problems to reach someone with sufficient authority to act.

The Authorising Officer should therefore be part of a defined escalation process for sponsorship compliance issues.

Examples could include:

 

• a sponsored worker unexpectedly stopping work;
• prolonged unauthorised absence;
• a proposed change to a sponsored worker’s role;
• salary changes;
• changes in working location;
• suspected illegal working;
• missing sponsorship records;
• incorrect information on a Certificate of Sponsorship;
• missed Home Office reporting deadlines;
• unauthorised SMS activity;
• restructuring or changes in ownership;
• the departure of key personnel; or
• contact from the Home Office about a compliance concern.

 

The Authorising Officer should be able to ensure that the issue is investigated, specialist advice is obtained where necessary and appropriate corrective or reporting action is taken.

 

11. Maintaining oversight where tasks are delegated

 

Delegation is normal and, for many employers, essential.

A large organisation could not reasonably expect its Authorising Officer personally to maintain every immigration document, monitor every absence or make every SMS submission.

The compliance risk arises when delegation becomes detachment.

An Authorising Officer who has delegated every aspect of sponsorship but has no process for receiving information, checking activity or identifying failures may struggle to demonstrate meaningful oversight.

A stronger governance model distinguishes between:

Operational responsibility — the person who performs the task.

Supervisory responsibility — the person who checks that the task is being performed correctly.

Senior oversight — the Authorising Officer who ensures the overall sponsorship system remains controlled and effective.

The underlying sponsor duties remain duties of the licensed organisation. Delegation of operational tasks does not transfer those duties away from the sponsor.

 

12. Keeping sponsorship arrangements under review

 

Sponsor licence governance should change as the organisation changes.

A system that worked when an employer sponsored five workers from one office may no longer be adequate when it sponsors 100 workers across multiple locations.

The Authorising Officer should therefore ensure that sponsorship arrangements are periodically reviewed, particularly following:

 

• rapid recruitment growth;
• acquisitions or mergers;
• restructuring;
• opening or closing locations;
• changes in HR personnel;
• changes to key personnel;
• implementation of new HR systems;
• increased use of overseas or remote working;
• significant changes to the Immigration Rules or sponsor guidance;
• previous compliance failures; or
• Home Office compliance activity.

 

The objective is to ensure that the organisation’s sponsorship controls continue to reflect how the business actually operates.

For the Authorising Officer, effective performance of the role is therefore less about personally administering the sponsor licence and more about maintaining visibility, control, verification and escalation across the sponsorship system.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section E: Authorising Officer & the Sponsor Management System

 

 

The Authorising Officer has an important governance role in relation to the Sponsor Management System (SMS), but appointment as Authorising Officer does not automatically give the individual access to the system.

This distinction can cause confusion for employers.

The Authorising Officer is responsible for deciding who should have SMS access and for overseeing the activities of those users, but they only gain their own SMS access if they are separately appointed to an appropriate SMS user role.

 

1. Does the Authorising Officer automatically have SMS access?

 

No.

Being appointed as the Authorising Officer does not automatically make the individual an SMS user.

If the Authorising Officer needs to access the SMS personally, they must also be appointed as a Level 1 User and satisfy the requirements applying to that role.

This means an organisation could have:

 

• an Authorising Officer who does not personally use the SMS;
• one or more Level 1 Users who perform the organisation’s sponsorship transactions; and
• existing transitional Level 2 Users, where applicable, while the Level 2 role is being phased out.

 

The Authorising Officer would retain senior oversight even though operational SMS activity is performed by other people.

 

2. Can the Authorising Officer also be a Level 1 User?

 

Yes.

The Authorising Officer can also be appointed as a Level 1 User, provided they satisfy the applicable requirements for that role.

For many smaller employers, combining the roles can be practical.

For example, the same senior individual may act as:

 

• Authorising Officer;
• Key Contact; and
• Level 1 User.

 

This gives that person both senior responsibility for sponsorship and the ability to carry out the necessary SMS transactions.

For larger organisations, separating the roles may be more practical. A senior HR Director might act as Authorising Officer while members of the immigration or HR team act as Level 1 Users and perform routine SMS administration.

Neither structure is inherently preferable. The appropriate arrangement depends on the size, complexity and sponsorship activity of the organisation.

What matters is that responsibility is clear and the Authorising Officer retains effective oversight.

 

3. Can the Authorising Officer be a Level 2 User?

 

No new Level 2 Users can be appointed from 9 September 2026.

This is not a restriction that applies only to Authorising Officers. The Home Office is phasing out the Level 2 User role altogether.

Existing Level 2 Users can remain temporarily during the transitional period, but they must either be converted to Level 1 Users, where they are eligible to hold that role, or have their accounts deactivated by 8 March 2027.

An Authorising Officer who requires SMS access should therefore be appointed as a Level 1 User, provided they satisfy the applicable Level 1 User requirements.

Employers reviewing historic key personnel and SMS arrangements should be careful not to rely on older guidance or internal procedures that treat Level 2 User as an ordinarily available appointment.

 

4. Who decides who has access to the SMS?

 

The Authorising Officer decides how many members of staff should be given access to the SMS and the level of permission they should have, within the parameters of the sponsor guidance.

This makes SMS access control a substantive part of the Authorising Officer’s responsibilities.

Access should be based on organisational need rather than convenience.

Before allowing someone to use the SMS, the sponsor should consider:

 

• why the individual requires access;
• which sponsorship activities they need to perform;
• whether they satisfy the relevant eligibility requirements;
• whether they understand the sponsor’s procedures;
• whether they have received appropriate training;
• what level of permission is necessary;
• how their activity will be supervised; and
• how access will be removed when it is no longer required.

 

The organisation should also periodically review existing users rather than allowing the SMS user list to grow indefinitely as employees change roles.

The phase-out of Level 2 Users also means sponsors with existing Level 2 accounts should review those arrangements before the transitional deadline and determine whether the individuals should become eligible Level 1 Users or have their SMS access removed.

 

5. Is the Authorising Officer responsible for mistakes made by SMS users?

 

The sponsor remains responsible for actions carried out through its sponsor licence, including actions taken by people authorised to use the SMS.

The Authorising Officer also has specific responsibility for overseeing SMS users.

This means employers should not regard the appointment of a Level 1 User as transferring responsibility for SMS activity away from the Authorising Officer or the sponsoring organisation.

If a Level 1 User incorrectly assigns a Certificate of Sponsorship, fails to make a required report or carries out unauthorised activity, the fact that the Authorising Officer did not personally make the submission will not, by itself, protect the sponsor from the consequences.

The more important questions are likely to include:

 

• why the individual had access;
• whether they were appropriately trained;
• whether appropriate internal controls existed;
• whether their activity was monitored;
• whether the error was identified;
• how quickly it was corrected; and
• whether the failure indicates a wider weakness in the sponsor’s compliance systems.

 

For this reason, SMS governance should combine appropriate access with meaningful supervision.

 

6. How should the Authorising Officer monitor SMS activity?

 

The Home Office requires sponsors to have a system for checking the activities of their SMS users.

Current sponsor guidance specifically recommends that the Authorising Officer checks the Certificates of Sponsorship assigned to workers at least once a month.

The distinction is important: the sponsor must have a system for checking SMS-user activity, while the monthly Authorising Officer check of assigned Certificates of Sponsorship is a specific Home Office recommendation for how oversight should operate.

Employers can use this monthly review as part of a wider SMS control process.

For example, the Authorising Officer could review:

 

• Certificates of Sponsorship assigned during the period;
• the workers to whom they were assigned;
• the relevant roles and salary information;
• whether the expected internal approvals were obtained;
• unexpected or unusual SMS activity;
• changes to SMS users;
• outstanding sponsor reports; and
• identified errors or corrective actions.

 

For organisations with high volumes of sponsored workers, the precise control structure may be more sophisticated, but the Authorising Officer should still have sufficient information to exercise effective oversight.

 

7. Should every HR employee have SMS access?

 

No.

SMS access should be restricted to individuals who genuinely require it.

An employee does not need an SMS account simply because they work in HR or have some involvement with sponsored workers.

For example, one HR employee may collect right to work documents, another may maintain personnel files and another may manage payroll information. None necessarily needs access to the SMS if sponsorship transactions are handled by designated users.

Restricting access can make accountability clearer and reduce the risk of:

 

• unauthorised activity;
• accidental changes;
• incorrect Certificate of Sponsorship assignments;
• inconsistent reporting;
• former employees retaining access; and
• uncertainty over who performed a particular transaction.

 

For larger employers, clearly defined SMS permissions should form part of the organisation’s wider sponsorship governance framework.

 

8. What happens when an SMS user leaves the organisation?

 

The sponsor should ensure that access is dealt with promptly when an SMS user leaves or otherwise ceases to require access.

The same principle applies when an employee changes role internally and no longer needs to perform sponsorship functions.

The organisation’s offboarding process should therefore identify whether a departing or transferring employee:

 

• is the Authorising Officer;
• is the Key Contact;
• is a Level 1 User;
• holds a transitional Level 2 User account;
• has any other relevant SMS access;
• holds sponsorship records or information needed by the organisation; or
• has outstanding sponsorship actions that need to be transferred.

 

This is particularly important where a departing employee has been the organisation’s principal immigration or HR administrator.

The Authorising Officer should ensure that sponsorship responsibilities do not disappear with the individual.

 

9. SMS access should follow responsibility, not job title

 

A useful principle for employers is that SMS access should follow operational need and responsibility rather than status.

A senior executive does not need SMS access simply because they are senior.

Equally, an employee should not be given access simply because they work in HR.

The employer should be able to explain:

who has access, why they have it, what they are permitted to do and how their activity is checked.

For the Authorising Officer, this is one of the clearest practical demonstrations of effective sponsor licence governance.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section F: Authorising Officer vs Other Sponsor Licence Key Personnel

 

 

The Authorising Officer is one of several key personnel roles within the sponsor licence system. Understanding the distinction between these roles is important because they perform different functions.

The Authorising Officer provides senior responsibility and oversight. The Key Contact provides a principal point of contact with the Home Office, while Level 1 Users perform operational activities through the Sponsor Management System.

The same eligible individual can hold more than one role, but the responsibilities associated with each role remain distinct.

 

Role	Primary Function	SMS Access	Number
Authorising Officer	Senior responsibility and oversight of sponsorship arrangements	Not automatic; must also be an eligible Level 1 User to access the SMS	One
Key Contact	Principal point of contact between the sponsor and the Home Office	Not automatic	One
Level 1 User	Operational management of the sponsor licence through the SMS	Yes	One or more, subject to the applicable requirements
Level 2 User	Historic restricted SMS user role, now being phased out	Restricted access for existing transitional users	No new appointments from 9 September 2026; existing users must be converted to Level 1 where eligible or deactivated by 8 March 2027

 

1. Authorising Officer vs Level 1 User

 

The distinction between the Authorising Officer and Level 1 User is particularly important.

The Authorising Officer is primarily a governance role.

The Level 1 User is primarily an operational SMS role.

A Level 1 User may carry out activities such as:

 

• managing information through the SMS;
• assigning Certificates of Sponsorship;
• making permitted sponsor reports;
• updating relevant sponsor information;
• managing aspects of the sponsor licence through the SMS; and
• undertaking other functions permitted to Level 1 Users.

 

The Authorising Officer may oversee those activities without personally carrying them out.

This is why appointment as Authorising Officer does not automatically provide SMS access.

If the Authorising Officer needs to perform SMS functions personally, they must also be appointed as a Level 1 User and satisfy the requirements applying to that role.

 

2. Can the Authorising Officer and Level 1 User be the same person?

 

Yes.

The same person can act as both Authorising Officer and Level 1 User where they satisfy the requirements for both roles.

This arrangement is common among smaller sponsors because it allows the person with senior responsibility for sponsorship to carry out the organisation’s SMS activity directly.

There can, however, be a continuity risk where one individual becomes responsible for almost every aspect of the licence.

If that person:

 

• leaves unexpectedly;
• becomes seriously ill;
• takes extended leave;
• changes role;
• loses eligibility to act as key personnel; or
• otherwise becomes unavailable,

 

the organisation may simultaneously lose its Authorising Officer and its principal operational SMS user.

Sponsors using this structure should therefore consider appropriate continuity arrangements.

 

3. Authorising Officer vs Key Contact

 

The Key Contact performs a different function from the Authorising Officer.

The Key Contact acts as the principal point of contact between the sponsoring organisation and the Home Office.

The Authorising Officer, by contrast, has senior responsibility for the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements and oversight of its sponsor duties.

The same individual can hold both roles where eligible, but employers should not assume that being the Home Office contact makes someone responsible for managing the entire sponsor licence.

In a larger organisation, for example:

 

• the HR Director could act as Authorising Officer;
• a senior immigration or HR manager could act as Key Contact; and
• members of the immigration team could act as Level 1 Users.

 

This can create a clear division between senior governance, Home Office communication and operational SMS administration.

 

4. Authorising Officer vs Level 2 User

 

The Level 2 User role is now a transitional role that is being phased out.

From 9 September 2026, sponsors can no longer appoint new Level 2 Users.

Existing Level 2 Users can continue temporarily, but sponsors must either convert them to Level 1 Users, where they satisfy the relevant eligibility requirements, or deactivate their accounts by 8 March 2027.

As a result, an Authorising Officer who requires access to the SMS should be appointed as an eligible Level 1 User.

Employers with historic Level 2 arrangements should review their SMS user structure as part of their sponsorship governance and ensure the required changes are completed before the transitional deadline.

 

5. Can the same person hold several key personnel roles?

 

Yes.

Subject to the individual satisfying the requirements applying to each role, the same person can hold several sponsor management roles.

For example, one person could potentially act as:

 

• Authorising Officer;
• Key Contact; and
• Level 1 User.

 

There can only be one Authorising Officer and one Key Contact at any given time, although a sponsor can have more than one eligible Level 1 User.

Whether roles should be combined is a governance decision as well as an eligibility question.

Combining roles can simplify sponsorship administration, particularly for smaller organisations. Separating them can provide greater resilience, segregation of duties and operational capacity for larger or more complex sponsors.

 

6. Governance, communication and administration

 

A useful way of distinguishing the principal sponsor management roles is to divide sponsorship activity into three broad functions:

Governance — Authorising Officer

Senior oversight of sponsorship arrangements, including responsibility for ensuring the organisation has appropriate systems and controls.

Communication — Key Contact

The principal contact between the sponsoring organisation and the Home Office.

Administration — Level 1 User

Operational management of the licence through the Sponsor Management System.

These functions can be performed by the same individual where permitted, but understanding the distinction helps employers allocate responsibilities properly.

 

7. Can other employees help manage sponsor compliance?

 

Yes.

Many employees can contribute to sponsor compliance without formally being appointed as key personnel or being given access to the SMS.

Depending on the organisation, sponsorship processes may involve:

 

• HR administrators;
• recruitment teams;
• payroll staff;
• line managers;
• global mobility teams;
• legal teams;
• finance teams;
• company secretarial teams;
• site managers; and
• external immigration advisers.

 

For example, a line manager may be responsible for alerting HR when a sponsored worker stops attending work, while payroll may identify a salary change and HR may determine whether the change needs to be reported.

A Level 1 User may then make the required SMS report.

The Authorising Officer does not have to perform any of those individual operational steps, but should ensure that the overall system enables relevant information to reach the correct person and that appropriate action is taken.

 

8. The Authorising Officer should sit above the process, not outside it

 

The Authorising Officer should generally sit above the sponsorship process without becoming detached from it.

This means the organisation should have a clear chain of responsibility:

Business activity → Operational sponsorship administration → Verification and escalation → Authorising Officer oversight.

For example, a line manager may identify a change affecting a sponsored worker. HR may assess the change. A Level 1 User may complete the required SMS action. The Authorising Officer may receive assurance that the issue has been dealt with correctly.

The precise structure will vary between organisations, but the underlying principle remains the same.

The sponsor should be able to demonstrate:

 

• who identifies sponsorship issues;
• who assesses them;
• who performs required SMS actions;
• who checks that those actions have been completed correctly;
• who escalates failures; and
• how the Authorising Officer maintains senior oversight.

 

This creates a sponsorship governance structure in which responsibilities are delegated without becoming disconnected from senior control.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section G: How the Authorising Officer Role Should Work in Practice

 

 

Home Office eligibility requirements establish who can act as an Authorising Officer. They do not, by themselves, create an effective system for managing a sponsor licence.

The practical challenge for employers is turning the Authorising Officer role into a functioning governance structure.

For most sponsors, effective Authorising Officer oversight can be considered through five connected elements:

Ownership → Delegation → Verification → Escalation → Evidence

This framework allows operational sponsorship activity to be delegated while maintaining appropriate senior control.

 

1. Ownership

 

The starting point is clear ownership of the sponsor licence.

The Authorising Officer should understand how sponsorship operates within the organisation and where responsibility sits for the different elements of compliance.

This does not require the Authorising Officer to become the organisation’s immigration lawyer or personally administer every sponsored worker.

It does require sufficient understanding to exercise meaningful oversight.

The Authorising Officer should know:

 

• why the organisation holds a sponsor licence;
• which immigration routes it is licensed to sponsor under;
• approximately how many sponsored workers it employs;
• which parts of the organisation recruit sponsored workers;
• who manages sponsorship administration;
• who currently has SMS access;
• how Certificates of Sponsorship are controlled;
• how sponsor reporting duties are identified;
• how required records are maintained;
• how sponsored workers are monitored;
• how compliance problems are escalated; and
• when specialist immigration advice is obtained.

 

An Authorising Officer who cannot answer these basic governance questions may have difficulty demonstrating effective oversight of the licence.

 

2. Delegation

 

Operational sponsorship activity can and usually should be delegated to appropriate people.

Depending on the organisation, responsibilities may be distributed between:

 

• Level 1 Users;
• HR teams;
• recruitment teams;
• global mobility teams;
• payroll;
• line managers;
• finance;
• company secretarial teams;
• legal teams; and
• external immigration advisers.

 

Effective delegation should be deliberate rather than assumed.

For each important sponsorship activity, the organisation should be able to identify:

 

• who performs the task;
• who checks the task;
• who needs to be informed;
• what deadline applies;
• when the matter should be escalated; and
• who provides cover if the responsible person is unavailable.

 

For example, a line manager might identify that a sponsored worker has changed duties, HR might assess the change, an immigration adviser might advise on its significance and a Level 1 User might make any required SMS report.

The Authorising Officer does not need to perform each step, but should understand that the process exists and who is responsible for it.

 

3. Verification

 

Delegation without verification creates compliance risk.

The Authorising Officer should have a proportionate means of checking that the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements are operating as intended.

Depending on the size and complexity of the sponsor, verification could include:

 

• reviewing Certificates of Sponsorship that have been assigned;
• reviewing relevant SMS activity;
• checking outstanding sponsorship actions;
• reviewing reports submitted to the Home Office;
• sampling sponsored-worker files;
• reviewing compliance exceptions;
• checking who currently has SMS access;
• reviewing identified reporting failures;
• considering internal or external audit findings; and
• checking that agreed remedial action has been completed.

 

Current Home Office sponsor guidance recommends that the Authorising Officer checks Certificates of Sponsorship assigned to workers at least once a month.

For employers with substantial sponsorship activity, this can form part of a wider periodic compliance reporting process.

For smaller sponsors, a simpler documented review may be sufficient.

The objective is the same: the Authorising Officer should not have to rely solely on an assumption that everything is being done correctly.

 

4. Escalation

 

Sponsorship problems often originate outside the immigration or HR team.

A line manager may know that a worker has stopped attending work. Payroll may know that salary has changed. Finance may know that the business is restructuring. The company secretary may know that ownership is changing.

If this information does not reach the sponsorship function, the employer may fail to identify a reporting or compliance issue.

The Authorising Officer should therefore ensure that clear escalation routes exist for events that may affect the sponsor licence.

These can include:

 

• a sponsored worker resigning or being dismissed;
• unauthorised or prolonged absence;
• changes to job duties;
• changes to salary;
• changes to working hours;
• changes to work location;
• changes to working arrangements;
• right to work concerns;
• suspected illegal working;
• errors on Certificates of Sponsorship;
• missed reporting deadlines;
• unexpected SMS activity;
• changes to key personnel;
• the departure of an SMS user;
• corporate restructuring;
• mergers or acquisitions;
• changes in ownership;
• insolvency issues;
• changes to business premises; and
• Home Office correspondence or compliance activity.

 

The organisation should determine who receives the initial information, who assesses whether sponsorship action is required and when the matter must be escalated to the Authorising Officer.

 

5. Evidence

 

Effective sponsor compliance should be capable of being demonstrated.

This does not mean creating unnecessary paperwork simply to show that the Authorising Officer is involved.

It means retaining proportionate evidence that the organisation has genuine systems for managing sponsorship and that those systems operate in practice.

Depending on the organisation, evidence of Authorising Officer oversight could include:

 

• written sponsorship procedures;
• documented allocation of responsibilities;
• Certificate of Sponsorship approval processes;
• records of periodic sponsorship reviews;
• records of relevant Authorising Officer checks;
• internal compliance reports;
• sponsor licence audit records;
• training records;
• records of compliance issues and escalation;
• remediation plans; and
• evidence that identified weaknesses were subsequently rechecked.

 

The objective is not to create a parallel bureaucracy around the sponsor licence.

It is to ensure that, if challenged, the organisation can explain how sponsorship is controlled and provide evidence supporting that explanation.

 

6. The Authorising Officer Oversight Framework

 

Employers can use the following framework to test whether their Authorising Officer arrangements provide effective oversight:

 

Element	Key Question
Ownership	Do I understand how our sponsor licence is managed and where responsibility sits?
Delegation	Is responsibility for each important sponsorship task clearly allocated?
Verification	How do I know that delegated sponsorship tasks are being completed correctly?
Escalation	Will sponsorship problems and relevant business changes reach me when they need to?
Evidence	Could we demonstrate our sponsorship controls to the Home Office if required?

 

This framework is an employer governance tool rather than a separate Home Office legal test. It is intended to help organisations translate their sponsor duties and Authorising Officer responsibilities into practical controls.

 

7. Delegated activity should not become invisible activity

 

The central principle behind effective Authorising Officer oversight is straightforward:

delegated activity should not become invisible activity.

The Authorising Officer does not need to perform every sponsorship function, but should have sufficient visibility to know how the licence is being operated, identify material problems and require corrective action.

This becomes increasingly important as an organisation grows.

A small sponsor may be able to manage sponsorship through direct involvement by one or two senior employees. A larger employer may require formal reporting structures, compliance dashboards, sampling, periodic audits and documented escalation processes.

The governance structure can therefore be proportionate to the organisation, but the underlying requirement for effective control remains.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section H: Authorising Officer Compliance Checklist

 

 

The Authorising Officer should have a proportionate process for reviewing how the sponsor licence is being managed.

This does not necessarily require constant involvement in day-to-day sponsorship administration. The objective is to create sufficient oversight to identify errors, changes and emerging compliance risks before they develop into more serious problems.

A practical Authorising Officer review structure can combine:

 

• monthly oversight;
• event-driven review; and
• periodic governance review.

 

The precise level of review should reflect the organisation’s size, number of sponsored workers, volume of sponsorship activity and compliance risk.

 

1. Monthly Authorising Officer checks

 

Current Home Office sponsor guidance recommends that the Authorising Officer checks the Certificates of Sponsorship assigned to workers at least once a month.

This should be distinguished from the wider requirement for the sponsor to have a system for checking the activities of its SMS users. The monthly Certificate of Sponsorship check is a specific Home Office recommendation and provides a useful foundation for broader Authorising Officer oversight.

A monthly review could consider:

 

• Certificates of Sponsorship assigned during the period;
• which workers received those Certificates;
• whether the sponsored roles correspond with the underlying recruitment decisions;
• whether the expected internal approvals were obtained;
• whether Certificate information appears consistent with HR and recruitment records;
• unexpected or unusual SMS activity;
• changes to SMS users;
• outstanding sponsor reports;
• compliance issues raised during the month;
• errors identified through routine administration; and
• whether agreed corrective actions have been completed.

 

The review does not necessarily have to involve the Authorising Officer repeating every immigration assessment performed by HR or an adviser.

Its purpose is to provide a reasonable level of senior assurance that sponsorship activity is controlled and that unusual or potentially problematic activity is identified.

 

2. Event-driven Authorising Officer review

 

Some events should trigger consideration of the sponsor licence without waiting for the next scheduled review.

The organisation should have escalation arrangements allowing relevant matters to reach the sponsorship function and, where appropriate, the Authorising Officer.

Potential trigger events can include:

 

• a sponsored worker resigning;
• dismissal or termination of employment;
• prolonged or unexplained absence;
• a change in a sponsored worker’s duties;
• a change in salary;
• a change in working hours;
• a change in work location;
• a significant change in working arrangements;
• a right to work concern;
• suspected illegal working;
• an error on a Certificate of Sponsorship;
• a missed Home Office reporting deadline;
• unexpected or potentially unauthorised SMS activity;
• the departure or proposed departure of key personnel;
• the departure of an SMS user;
• a merger or acquisition;
• a change in ownership;
• corporate restructuring;
• insolvency;
• opening or closing business premises;
• a significant change to the organisation’s structure;
• Home Office correspondence;
• notification of a compliance visit; or
• another identified sponsorship compliance breach.

 

Not every event will require the Authorising Officer personally to take action.

The important point is that the organisation has a process for identifying the issue, assessing whether sponsor action is required and escalating material matters appropriately.

 

3. Periodic key personnel review

 

The Authorising Officer should ensure that the organisation periodically checks whether its key personnel arrangements remain appropriate.

The review should consider:

 

• whether the current Authorising Officer remains eligible;
• whether the Key Contact remains appropriate;
• whether the organisation continues to have at least one eligible Level 1 User;
• whether additional Level 1 Users are necessary for operational resilience;
• whether existing SMS users still require access;
• whether any SMS user has changed role;
• whether former employees have been removed from relevant access arrangements;
• whether key personnel details held by the Home Office remain accurate; and
• whether the organisation has adequate cover for absence or departure.

 

Employers with existing Level 2 Users should also review those accounts as part of this exercise.

No new Level 2 Users can be appointed from 9 September 2026. Existing Level 2 Users must either be converted to Level 1 Users, where they satisfy the applicable requirements, or have their accounts deactivated by 8 March 2027.

This makes the current transitional period an appropriate time for sponsors to review their wider SMS access arrangements rather than treating the Level 2 change as an isolated administrative exercise.

 

4. Periodic sponsored-worker review

 

The organisation should also have appropriate arrangements for reviewing its sponsored-worker population.

Depending on the employer, this could involve checking:

 

• which sponsored workers remain employed;
• the roles in which they are working;
• their current salary and working arrangements;
• their principal work locations;
• relevant visa or permission expiry dates;
• whether required records are available;
• whether relevant changes have been reported;
• whether unexplained absences or attendance issues have arisen; and
• whether there are discrepancies between HR records and sponsorship information.

 

The purpose is not necessarily for the Authorising Officer to personally audit every sponsored worker.

The Authorising Officer should instead be satisfied that the organisation has an appropriate process for identifying material discrepancies and escalating them where necessary.

 

5. Periodic reporting review

 

Sponsor reporting is an area where failures can occur even when the organisation has competent immigration personnel.

The problem is often the flow of information.

The Authorising Officer should periodically consider whether the people responsible for sponsor reporting are receiving relevant information from the rest of the organisation.

This could involve reviewing the connection between the sponsorship function and:

 

• HR;
• recruitment;
• payroll;
• line management;
• finance;
• global mobility;
• legal;
• company secretarial functions; and
• senior management.

 

For example, payroll may process a salary change without appreciating that it could have immigration consequences. A manager may approve a change in duties without informing HR. Senior management may restructure a business unit without considering whether the change affects the sponsor licence.

The governance question is therefore not simply:

“Does our Level 1 User know how to make an SMS report?”

It is:

“Will the Level 1 User receive the information needed to identify that a report may be required?”

 

6. Periodic record-keeping review

 

The sponsor should be able to produce the records required under the sponsorship system when requested.

The Authorising Officer should therefore have confidence that record-keeping processes are functioning in practice.

A periodic review could consider:

 

• whether required documents are being retained;
• whether sponsored-worker files are complete;
• whether information is stored consistently;
• whether records can be retrieved promptly;
• whether responsibilities are clear;
• whether new document requirements have been incorporated into procedures; and
• whether weaknesses identified in previous reviews have been corrected.

 

For larger organisations, sample testing may be more practical than reviewing every worker file.

The review should be proportionate to the organisation’s sponsorship activity and risk profile.

 

7. Review SMS access when responsibilities change

 

SMS access should not remain unchanged simply because an individual continues to work for the organisation.

An employee may move from immigration to another HR function, transfer to another group company, take extended leave or change responsibilities in a way that means SMS access is no longer appropriate.

The Authorising Officer should ensure there is a process for reviewing access when roles change.

Relevant questions include:

 

• Does the individual still need access?
• Do they remain eligible?
• Are their current permissions appropriate?
• Have their responsibilities changed?
• Should another Level 1 User be appointed?
• Does the organisation retain adequate operational cover?

 

Access control should therefore be treated as a continuing governance issue rather than a one-off decision made when the SMS account is created.

 

8. Test written procedures against actual practice

 

A written sponsor compliance policy is useful only if it reflects how the organisation actually operates.

Over time, business practices can diverge from written procedures.

For example:

 

• the policy may say managers report absences to HR, but managers may not know they are required to do so;
• the policy may require CoS approval by a senior manager, while in practice Level 1 Users assign them without documented approval;
• the policy may identify an employee who has since left the organisation;
• the organisation may introduce a new HR system without updating sponsorship procedures; or
• responsibility may shift between teams without the written process being amended.

 

The Authorising Officer should therefore periodically test whether documented procedures correspond with actual organisational practice.

This is particularly valuable before a Home Office compliance visit or following significant organisational change.

 

9. Keep proportionate evidence of Authorising Officer oversight

 

The organisation should be capable of demonstrating how sponsorship is governed.

Evidence does not need to become unnecessarily bureaucratic.

Depending on the size of the sponsor, useful evidence might include:

 

• records of periodic Authorising Officer reviews;
• CoS approval records;
• monthly CoS review records;
• SMS user reviews;
• compliance meeting notes;
• internal audit reports;
• external sponsor licence audit reports;
• training records;
• documented escalation of compliance problems;
• remediation records; and
• confirmation that corrective actions were subsequently checked.

 

The purpose is not to create evidence for its own sake.

The purpose is to demonstrate that senior oversight is genuine and that the organisation responds appropriately when compliance issues arise.

 

10. Distinguish Home Office requirements from employer best practice

 

Employers should distinguish between specific Home Office requirements and additional governance controls adopted as good practice.

For example, the Home Office requires sponsors to have a system for checking SMS-user activities and recommends that the Authorising Officer checks Certificates of Sponsorship assigned to workers at least monthly.

An employer may choose to go further by introducing:

 

• quarterly sponsorship governance meetings;
• annual sponsor licence audits;
• formal CoS approval procedures;
• compliance dashboards;
• exception reporting;
• file sampling;
• annual SMS access reviews; or
• documented succession planning.

 

These additional controls should not be presented as separate Home Office legal requirements where they are not.

They are practical measures that employers can use to help demonstrate effective control of sponsorship.

 

11. Authorising Officer compliance cycle

 

A practical compliance cycle for the Authorising Officer can be expressed as:

Review → Identify → Escalate → Correct → Record → Recheck

Review sponsorship activity and relevant controls.

Identify discrepancies, failures or emerging risks.

Escalate matters requiring specialist or senior attention.

Correct the immediate problem and make any required report or other action.

Record what happened and the action taken.

Recheck the issue to ensure that corrective measures have worked.

This is an employer governance framework rather than a separate Home Office-prescribed legal test. Its purpose is to help the Authorising Officer translate senior responsibility into a repeatable oversight process.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section I: Changing Your Authorising Officer

 

 

An organisation can change its Authorising Officer during the life of its sponsor licence.

Changes may be necessary because the existing Authorising Officer:

 

• leaves the organisation;
• changes role;
• is promoted or transferred;
• becomes ineligible to act as key personnel;
• will be unavailable for an extended period;
• is no longer the appropriate senior person responsible for sponsorship;
• moves to another group company; or
• can no longer provide effective oversight of the sponsor licence.

 

The important compliance issue is continuity. Sponsors are required to maintain an eligible Authorising Officer throughout the life of the licence.

A change of Authorising Officer should therefore be treated as a sponsor licence governance event rather than simply an HR administrative change.

 

1. What happens if the Authorising Officer leaves?

 

If the Authorising Officer leaves the organisation, the sponsor needs to ensure that an eligible replacement is appointed and the required Home Office process is completed.

Where a departure is known in advance, the replacement should ideally be identified before the existing Authorising Officer leaves.

This allows the employer to consider:

 

• whether the proposed replacement is eligible;
• whether they have sufficient seniority;
• whether they understand their responsibilities;
• whether they also need SMS access;
• whether they should become a Level 1 User;
• whether the Key Contact needs to change;
• whether existing Level 1 User coverage remains adequate;
• whether outstanding sponsorship matters need to be transferred; and
• whether the departure reveals any wider continuity weakness.

 

An unexpected departure can create greater risk, particularly where the Authorising Officer also acts as the organisation’s Key Contact and principal Level 1 User.

This is why succession planning should form part of sponsor licence governance.

 

2. How do you change the Authorising Officer?

 

Changes to sponsor licence key personnel are generally managed through the Sponsor Management System.

A Level 1 User can use the SMS to request the replacement of the existing Authorising Officer.

The precise process and supporting evidence should be checked against the current Home Office sponsor guidance and SMS instructions at the time the change is made.

Under the current arrangements, an Authorising Officer replacement can be updated automatically in certain circumstances where the relevant conditions are met.

These conditions include the sponsor:

 

• having a fully active sponsor licence;
• holding an A-rating; and
• meeting the applicable postcode conditions for the new key personnel appointment.

 

Employers should not interpret an automatic SMS update as meaning that no further requirements apply.

Where the Authorising Officer is being replaced, the sponsor is still required to provide the relevant signed submission sheet and any supporting documents required by the Home Office.

UKVI can also carry out its standard checks on the proposed new key personnel.

 

3. Does the 20-working-day reporting deadline apply when replacing the Authorising Officer?

 

Employers should be careful not to apply the general sponsor reporting rules mechanically to an Authorising Officer replacement.

Current Home Office sponsor guidance provides a general requirement to report specified organisational changes within 20 working days, but specifically distinguishes the replacement of an Authorising Officer or Key Contact from that general provision.

Employers should therefore not state simply that every Authorising Officer replacement is governed by a 20-working-day reporting deadline.

The replacement should instead be dealt with promptly through the applicable SMS key personnel procedure, taking account of the continuing requirement for the sponsor to maintain an eligible Authorising Officer.

This distinction is particularly important where an Authorising Officer is leaving unexpectedly. The fact that some organisational changes are subject to a 20-working-day reporting period should not be treated as allowing the sponsor to operate without an eligible Authorising Officer during that period.

 

4. Does the new Authorising Officer have to meet the same requirements?

 

Yes.

A replacement Authorising Officer must satisfy the relevant Home Office requirements applying to the role.

The employer should therefore assess the proposed replacement in the same way it would assess an Authorising Officer when making a new sponsor licence application.

This should include considering:

 

• their position within the organisation;
• their seniority;
• their responsibility for sponsored-worker recruitment and sponsor compliance;
• whether they are a paid member of staff or office holder as required;
• whether they are based in the UK for the period in which they will fill the role, subject to any applicable exception;
• their immigration status;
• their National Insurance number where required;
• their relationship with the licensed organisation;
• their previous sponsorship history;
• relevant criminal, regulatory or compliance issues; and
• whether they otherwise satisfy the key personnel suitability requirements.

 

An employer should not assume that the next most senior HR employee automatically qualifies.

 

5. What if the Authorising Officer is temporarily absent?

 

A temporary absence does not necessarily mean that the sponsor must immediately replace its Authorising Officer.

The appropriate response will depend on the circumstances, including:

 

• the expected duration of the absence;
• whether the individual remains eligible to hold the role;
• whether they remain based in the UK for the period in which they fill the role in accordance with the applicable requirements;
• whether effective senior oversight can continue;
• whether the sponsor has adequate Level 1 User coverage;
• whether important sponsorship decisions are likely to arise during the absence; and
• whether the absence becomes sufficiently significant to require a change in the organisation’s arrangements.

 

A short period of annual leave is fundamentally different from an indefinite absence, permanent overseas relocation or circumstances in which the individual can no longer exercise the responsibilities associated with the role.

Employers should assess the substance of the arrangement rather than treating the individual’s continued job title as determinative.

 

6. What if the Authorising Officer changes job internally?

 

An internal job change should trigger a review of whether the individual remains the appropriate Authorising Officer.

For example, an HR Director may move into a different strategic role and cease to have responsibility for sponsored recruitment or sponsor compliance.

Even though the individual remains employed by the same organisation, their new responsibilities may mean another senior employee is now the appropriate person to hold the Authorising Officer role.

The employer should consider:

 

• whether the individual still meets the specific Authorising Officer requirements;
• whether they continue to have the necessary senior responsibility;
• whether they retain sufficient access to sponsorship information;
• whether they can still exercise effective control; and
• whether a replacement should be appointed.

 

This is another reason why key personnel details should be reviewed whenever senior HR, recruitment or management responsibilities change.

 

7. Changing the Authorising Officer should trigger a wider governance review

 

Replacing an Authorising Officer provides an opportunity to review the wider sponsor licence structure.

Employers should consider whether:

 

• the Key Contact remains appropriate;
• there is at least one eligible Level 1 User;
• additional Level 1 Users are needed for resilience;
• SMS access remains appropriate;
• any transitional Level 2 accounts need to be converted or deactivated;
• sponsorship procedures identify the correct personnel;
• internal escalation routes remain accurate;
• outstanding sponsor reports have been completed;
• outstanding Certificates of Sponsorship or applications require attention;
• compliance records are complete;
• the new Authorising Officer requires training; and
• there are unresolved compliance issues that should be brought to the new Authorising Officer’s attention.

 

This is particularly important where the previous Authorising Officer also performed significant operational sponsorship functions.

 

8. Authorising Officer succession planning

 

Employers should avoid waiting until the Authorising Officer resigns before considering how the sponsor licence would continue without them.

A proportionate succession plan should answer questions such as:

 

• Who could replace the Authorising Officer if necessary?
• Would that individual satisfy the eligibility requirements?
• Who would manage the SMS during the transition?
• Would the organisation continue to have an eligible Level 1 User?
• Where are sponsorship procedures and records maintained?
• Who knows about outstanding sponsorship matters?
• Who has access to relevant Home Office correspondence?
• How would responsibilities be transferred?
• Would the replacement need training?

 

For smaller sponsors where the Authorising Officer is also the Key Contact and only Level 1 User, succession planning is especially important.

The objective is to prevent the departure of one employee from creating an immediate breakdown in the organisation’s ability to manage its sponsor licence.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section J: What Happens If There Is No Eligible Authorising Officer?

 

 

Maintaining an eligible Authorising Officer is a continuing requirement of holding a sponsor licence.

The requirement does not end once the sponsor licence application has been approved. The organisation must maintain appropriate key personnel throughout the life of the licence.

This makes the loss of an eligible Authorising Officer a potentially serious sponsor compliance issue.

Current Home Office sponsor guidance contains two important formulations that employers should distinguish.

First, the guidance requires the sponsor to have an eligible Authorising Officer and at least one eligible Level 1 User throughout the life of the sponsor licence. Where the sponsor does not have these required key personnel in place, the guidance states that the Home Office will revoke the sponsor licence.

Separately, the specific Authorising Officer provisions state that where the sponsor no longer has a suitable and eligible Authorising Officer, or fails to tell the Home Office of a relevant change to its Authorising Officer, the Home Office will normally revoke the sponsor licence.

Employers should therefore avoid treating the Authorising Officer appointment as an administrative detail that can simply be corrected at some later point.

 

1. How can an Authorising Officer become ineligible?

 

An Authorising Officer who was eligible when appointed may cease to satisfy the requirements later.

This can happen because of changes affecting either the individual or the organisation.

Examples can include:

 

• the Authorising Officer leaving the organisation;
• moving to another group company;
• ceasing to be a paid member of staff or office holder where this is required;
• changing role and no longer having the required senior responsibility;
• relocating overseas in circumstances inconsistent with the requirement to be based in the UK while filling the role;
• a change in immigration status;
• relevant criminal or regulatory developments;
• circumstances affecting their suitability to act as key personnel;
• corporate restructuring that changes their relationship with the licensed entity; or
• another change that means they no longer satisfy the applicable key personnel or Authorising Officer requirements.

 

The sponsor should therefore consider continuing eligibility when relevant circumstances change rather than assuming that an appointment remains valid indefinitely.

 

2. What if the Authorising Officer leaves without a replacement?

 

An unexpected departure can create an immediate compliance risk.

This risk is particularly acute where the departing Authorising Officer is also:

 

• the Key Contact;
• the organisation’s only Level 1 User;
• the main person responsible for immigration compliance;
• the holder of important sponsorship records; or
• the only person who understands the organisation’s sponsorship processes.

 

The employer should establish what roles the departing individual holds and take prompt action to maintain compliant key personnel arrangements.

The organisation should not assume that a general reporting period allows it to remain without an eligible Authorising Officer.

As explained above, replacement of the Authorising Officer is specifically distinguished in the current sponsor guidance from the general 20-working-day rule applying to specified organisational changes.

The continuing requirement to maintain an eligible Authorising Officer remains critical.

 

3. What if the sponsor fails to report a change of Authorising Officer?

 

Failing to update the Home Office when the Authorising Officer changes can itself create a sponsor compliance problem.

The sponsor should ensure that its SMS information accurately reflects the organisation’s current key personnel arrangements and that the applicable procedure for replacing the Authorising Officer is followed promptly.

Current Home Office guidance states that where the sponsor no longer has a suitable and eligible Authorising Officer, or fails to tell the Home Office of a relevant change to the Authorising Officer, the Home Office will normally revoke the sponsor licence.

This means the risk is not limited to situations where the organisation has nobody performing the role in practice.

An employer can also create risk where its internal arrangements have changed but its Home Office records have not been properly updated.

 

4. Can poor Authorising Officer oversight put the licence at risk?

 

Yes.

Having an eligible person named as Authorising Officer does not remove the sponsor’s wider obligation to comply with its sponsor duties.

Problems can arise where the Authorising Officer exists formally but the organisation does not exercise effective control over sponsorship activity.

Examples could include:

 

• the Authorising Officer having no meaningful involvement in sponsorship governance;
• nobody monitoring SMS-user activity;
• Certificates of Sponsorship being assigned without adequate controls;
• reportable events not reaching the sponsorship team;
• sponsored-worker records being incomplete;
• SMS access remaining with inappropriate users;
• compliance failures being identified but not escalated;
• the sponsor relying entirely on one administrator without supervision; or
• the organisation being unable to explain how its sponsor duties are managed.

 

In these circumstances, the issue may extend beyond the performance of the individual Authorising Officer and indicate wider failures by the licensed sponsor.

 

5. What action can the Home Office take?

 

The consequences of sponsor compliance failures depend on the nature and seriousness of the issue, the applicable sponsor guidance and the wider circumstances.

Depending on the case, Home Office action can include:

 

• requests for further information or evidence;
• additional compliance scrutiny;
• restrictions or other action affecting the licence where provided for under the sponsor regime;
• downgrading of the sponsor licence where applicable;
• implementation of an action plan where the relevant provisions permit this;
• suspension of the sponsor licence; or
• revocation of the sponsor licence.

 

Employers should not assume that every Authorising Officer problem automatically produces the same outcome.

However, the absence of required eligible key personnel is treated particularly seriously in the sponsor guidance, and the express revocation provisions should not be understated.

 

6. An Authorising Officer failure can expose wider governance problems

 

A problem involving the Authorising Officer may prompt wider questions about how the organisation manages its sponsor licence.

For example, if the Home Office identifies that the recorded Authorising Officer left the organisation several months earlier, it may be relevant to establish:

 

• why the change was not identified;
• who was overseeing sponsorship during the period;
• whether the SMS information was accurate;
• whether Level 1 Users remained eligible;
• whether sponsor reports were made correctly;
• whether Certificates of Sponsorship were assigned during the period;
• whether those assignments were appropriately controlled;
• whether sponsored-worker records were maintained;
• whether other organisational changes were also missed; and
• whether the sponsor’s compliance systems were operating effectively.

 

The original key personnel problem can therefore become evidence of a wider governance weakness.

 

7. What if an SMS user makes a serious mistake?

 

Where an SMS user makes a serious mistake, the sponsor should consider both the immediate error and the system that allowed the error to occur.

For example, if an incorrect Certificate of Sponsorship has been assigned, the organisation may need to consider:

 

• whether the information can or should be corrected;
• whether the Home Office needs to be informed;
• whether the worker’s immigration position is affected;
• how the error occurred;
• whether the SMS user understood the process;
• whether appropriate approval was obtained;
• whether similar errors may have occurred elsewhere;
• whether access permissions remain appropriate; and
• whether additional controls or training are required.

 

The Authorising Officer should have sufficient oversight to ensure that significant problems are escalated and addressed.

 

8. Correction and remediation are not the same thing

 

Correcting an individual sponsorship error is important, but it may not address the underlying compliance weakness.

For example:

Correction may involve fixing an inaccurate record or making an outstanding report.

Remediation considers why the error occurred and changes the organisation’s processes to reduce the risk of recurrence.

If a reporting deadline was missed because a line manager failed to tell HR about a worker change, correcting the report addresses the immediate problem.

Remediation may additionally involve:

 

• changing the manager reporting process;
• providing training;
• introducing an escalation mechanism;
• clarifying responsibilities;
• checking whether similar reports were missed; and
• testing the revised process afterwards.

 

For the Authorising Officer, this distinction is important because effective oversight should consider both the individual compliance incident and the governance weakness that caused it.

 

9. Maintaining continuity of sponsorship control

 

The central objective is to ensure that the organisation maintains both:

an eligible Authorising Officer; and effective control of its sponsorship activities.

These are related but distinct issues.

An organisation can have a formally eligible Authorising Officer but weak sponsorship systems.

Equally, it may have capable HR and immigration personnel but create a serious compliance problem if it ceases to maintain the mandatory eligible key personnel required under the sponsor guidance.

Effective sponsor licence governance therefore requires employers to maintain the formal appointments required by the Home Office while ensuring those appointments operate within a functioning compliance system.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section K: Authorising Officer & Home Office Compliance Visits

 

 

The Authorising Officer can play an important role during a Home Office sponsor compliance visit because they are the senior person responsible for the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements.

A compliance visit may test not only whether the sponsor holds the required documents, but whether the organisation understands its sponsor duties and has effective systems for complying with them in practice.

The Home Office may therefore examine how sponsorship is governed, who performs key tasks, how information moves through the organisation and how senior oversight is exercised.

The Authorising Officer should be capable of explaining these arrangements even where most day-to-day sponsorship administration is performed by HR personnel, Level 1 Users or external advisers.

 

1. Will the Home Office interview the Authorising Officer?

 

The Authorising Officer should not assume that they will necessarily be interviewed during every compliance visit.

The Home Office may speak with different people depending on the purpose and circumstances of the compliance activity.

These could include:

 

• the Authorising Officer;
• Level 1 Users;
• the Key Contact;
• HR personnel;
• recruitment staff;
• line managers;
• other employees involved in sponsorship administration; and
• sponsored workers.

 

The important point is that the sponsor should not depend on one individual being able to provide every answer.

The people involved in sponsorship should understand the parts of the compliance system for which they are responsible, while the Authorising Officer should understand the overall governance structure.

 

2. What should the Authorising Officer understand?

 

The Authorising Officer does not need to memorise every provision of the Immigration Rules or sponsor guidance.

They should, however, have sufficient knowledge of the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements to explain how the licence is controlled.

Depending on the organisation, the Authorising Officer should be able to explain matters such as:

 

• why the organisation holds a sponsor licence;
• which parts of the organisation recruit sponsored workers;
• approximately how many sponsored workers the organisation employs;
• who manages sponsorship on a day-to-day basis;
• who currently has access to the SMS;
• how SMS-user activity is monitored;
• how sponsored roles are assessed before sponsorship;
• how Certificates of Sponsorship are approved and assigned;
• how sponsored workers are monitored;
• how absences are identified;
• how changes affecting sponsored workers reach HR or the sponsorship team;
• how potential reportable events are assessed;
• how required sponsorship records are maintained;
• how right to work compliance is managed;
• how compliance problems are escalated;
• what happens when key personnel leave; and
• how the organisation obtains specialist advice where necessary.

 

The precise level of detail expected will depend on the organisation and the issue being examined.

 

3. Does the Authorising Officer need to know immigration law?

 

The Authorising Officer does not have to be an immigration lawyer.

Organisations can use specialist HR teams, immigration professionals and legal advisers to help assess complex sponsorship and immigration issues.

The Authorising Officer should nevertheless have sufficient understanding of the sponsor’s principal duties and internal processes to exercise meaningful oversight.

For example, they should understand that the organisation has obligations relating to:

 

• sponsored-worker record keeping;
• reporting specified changes;
• monitoring sponsored workers;
• maintaining appropriate key personnel;
• controlling SMS access;
• ensuring Certificates of Sponsorship are assigned appropriately; and
• cooperating with Home Office compliance activity.

 

They should also know when an issue requires escalation for specialist advice rather than attempting to make an unsupported immigration assessment themselves.

 

4. Can the Authorising Officer say that HR manages everything?

 

Operational sponsorship responsibilities can legitimately be delegated to HR or another appropriate team.

The compliance concern arises where the Authorising Officer has no meaningful understanding of what has been delegated or how the organisation checks that those responsibilities are being performed correctly.

A stronger explanation would identify:

 

• what has been delegated;
• who performs each function;
• how the individual or team is supervised;
• how the Authorising Officer receives assurance;
• what happens when a problem is identified; and
• how material issues are escalated.

 

This demonstrates a controlled delegation model rather than detachment from sponsorship compliance.

 

5. What evidence can demonstrate Authorising Officer oversight?

 

The evidence available will vary between sponsors, but an organisation may be able to demonstrate its sponsorship governance through documents and records such as:

 

• sponsor compliance policies;
• allocation of responsibility documents;
• organisational charts;
• Certificate of Sponsorship approval records;
• SMS-user records;
• records of Authorising Officer reviews;
• records of monthly CoS checks;
• staff training records;
• internal compliance reports;
• sponsor licence audit reports;
• sponsored-worker file checks;
• records of compliance issues and escalation;
• remediation plans; and
• evidence that identified problems were corrected and subsequently rechecked.

 

Not every sponsor needs every type of document.

The evidence should be proportionate to the size, complexity and sponsorship activity of the organisation.

The objective is to be able to demonstrate that the sponsor’s compliance arrangements are genuine and operational rather than existing only on paper.

 

6. What if the Authorising Officer cannot answer a question?

 

The Authorising Officer should not guess when they do not know the answer to a detailed question.

In a larger organisation, it is entirely possible that another employee will have greater knowledge of a particular operational process.

For example, payroll may be best placed to explain salary administration, while a Level 1 User may be better placed to explain the mechanics of a particular SMS transaction.

The Authorising Officer should nevertheless understand who is responsible for the issue and how it fits within the organisation’s sponsorship controls.

Where appropriate, the Authorising Officer should be able to explain:

 

• who performs the relevant task;
• where the relevant records are held;
• how the process operates;
• how the activity is checked; and
• how problems are escalated.

 

This is different from an Authorising Officer who simply has no knowledge of how the sponsor licence is managed.

 

7. Home Office compliance can test actual practice

 

A sponsor should not assume that having comprehensive written policies will, by itself, demonstrate compliance.

Compliance activity can examine whether the organisation actually follows the procedures it says it follows.

For example, the Home Office may identify differences between:

 

• the written sponsorship procedure and staff explanations;
• HR records and SMS information;
• the sponsored role and the work actually being performed;
• the stated absence-monitoring procedure and actual attendance records;
• the recorded key personnel and the people currently managing sponsorship; or
• formal CoS approval procedures and what happens in practice.

 

The Authorising Officer should therefore be concerned with how sponsorship operates in reality, not merely whether a compliant policy document exists.

 

8. Common Authorising Officer weaknesses exposed during compliance activity

 

Potential weaknesses that may become apparent during compliance activity include:

 

• the Authorising Officer being unable to explain the sponsorship structure;
• the organisation not knowing who has SMS access;
• no meaningful review of SMS activity;
• weak control over Certificates of Sponsorship;
• complete dependence on one Level 1 User;
• excessive dependence on an external immigration adviser;
• poor communication between managers and HR;
• no clear process for escalating sponsorship changes;
• key personnel information being out of date;
• written procedures not reflecting actual practice;
• required records being difficult to locate;
• the organisation being unable to identify its sponsored-worker population; or
• identified compliance problems not being followed through to remediation.

 

The presence of one of these issues does not necessarily determine the outcome of a compliance visit. The significance will depend on the facts, the applicable sponsor duties and the wider evidence.

However, they can indicate weaknesses in the organisation’s sponsorship governance that should be addressed.

 

9. Preparing the Authorising Officer for a compliance visit

 

Preparation should focus on helping the Authorising Officer understand the organisation’s actual sponsorship arrangements rather than teaching scripted answers.

A useful preparation exercise is to ensure the Authorising Officer can explain:

Who manages each element of sponsorship?

What controls are used?

How are sponsor duties carried out?

Where are relevant records maintained?

When are issues reviewed or reported?

What happens when something goes wrong?

This approach helps test whether the organisation itself understands its sponsorship system.

 

10. The central compliance question for the Authorising Officer

 

The Authorising Officer should ultimately be able to demonstrate that the organisation exercises effective senior oversight of its sponsor licence.

This does not require the Authorising Officer to personally undertake every sponsorship task.

It requires the organisation to be able to show that:

 

• responsibilities are clearly allocated;
• appropriate people perform sponsorship tasks;
• SMS access is controlled;
• activity is monitored;
• relevant information reaches the sponsorship function;
• problems are escalated;
• corrective action is taken; and
• the Authorising Officer has sufficient visibility to oversee the system.

 

For employers preparing for Home Office scrutiny, this is one of the most important practical tests of whether the Authorising Officer role is functioning as intended.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section L: Common Authorising Officer Problems

 

 

Many Authorising Officer problems do not begin with a deliberate breach of the sponsor rules. They develop because responsibilities become unclear, business practices change or sponsorship activity becomes more complex without the organisation’s governance arrangements changing with it.

Identifying these weaknesses early can help employers address them before they result in missed reports, inaccurate SMS activity or wider sponsor compliance failures.

 

1. The Authorising Officer leaves unexpectedly

 

An unexpected departure can create an immediate sponsorship risk, particularly where the Authorising Officer also acts as the:

 

• Key Contact;
• only Level 1 User;
• main immigration contact;
• principal administrator of sponsored workers; or
• person holding most of the organisation’s sponsorship knowledge.

 

The organisation may suddenly lose both senior oversight and operational capability.

Employers should therefore know who could potentially replace the Authorising Officer and how sponsorship responsibilities would continue during a transition.

 

2. The Authorising Officer is too detached from sponsorship

 

Appointing the most senior person in the organisation is not necessarily the strongest approach if that individual has almost no involvement in recruitment or sponsorship compliance.

A Chief Executive, for example, may have considerable corporate authority but little visibility of how sponsored workers are recruited or how the sponsor licence is operated.

The risk is that the appointment becomes nominal.

The Authorising Officer should have sufficient access to the sponsorship function to understand how it operates, receive appropriate assurance and intervene where necessary.

 

3. The Authorising Officer knows too little about the sponsor licence

 

The Authorising Officer does not need to be an immigration specialist, but they should understand the principal features of the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements.

A potential weakness exists where the Authorising Officer cannot explain:

 

• who manages the sponsor licence;
• who has SMS access;
• how Certificates of Sponsorship are controlled;
• how sponsored workers are monitored;
• how relevant changes are identified;
• how sponsor reports are made;
• where sponsorship records are maintained; or
• what happens when a compliance problem arises.

 

Training and periodic governance reviews can help prevent the Authorising Officer becoming disconnected from the system they are expected to oversee.

 

4. HR manages everything without Authorising Officer oversight

 

It is entirely legitimate for HR or a specialist immigration team to manage day-to-day sponsorship administration.

The problem arises where operational responsibility becomes effectively unsupervised.

For example, a Level 1 User may be able to assign Certificates of Sponsorship, submit reports and manage SMS information without the Authorising Officer ever reviewing what activity has taken place.

This can create a gap between operational administration and senior governance.

A proportionate assurance process should allow the Authorising Officer to understand what sponsorship activity is taking place and whether material problems have arisen.

 

5. Too many people have SMS access

 

Providing SMS access to numerous employees can make accountability more difficult and increase the potential for mistakes.

The organisation should be able to explain why each SMS user requires access.

Common problems can include:

 

• users retaining access after changing roles;
• former employees not being dealt with promptly;
• employees receiving access simply because they work in HR;
• uncertainty about who performed particular SMS actions;
• inconsistent approaches between users; and
• users carrying out transactions without appropriate internal approval.

 

The Authorising Officer should ensure that SMS access remains proportionate to operational need.

 

6. The Authorising Officer never reviews SMS activity

 

The sponsor must have a system for checking the activities of its SMS users.

Current Home Office guidance also recommends that the Authorising Officer checks the Certificates of Sponsorship assigned to workers at least once a month.

An Authorising Officer who never reviews SMS activity may have limited ability to identify:

 

• unexpected CoS assignments;
• incorrect worker information;
• unauthorised activity;
• unusual patterns of sponsorship;
• errors by SMS users; or
• weaknesses in internal approval processes.

 

A proportionate review process can provide evidence that SMS activity is subject to genuine senior oversight.

 

7. Nobody owns sponsor reporting deadlines

 

Reporting failures often arise because responsibility is divided between several people without a clear process.

For example, a line manager may know that a worker’s duties have changed, HR may update the employment record and the Level 1 User may know how to use the SMS, but nobody is clearly responsible for connecting those steps.

For potentially reportable events, the organisation should be able to identify:

 

• who identifies the change;
• who decides whether sponsor action is required;
• who provides the necessary information;
• who makes any required SMS report;
• who checks that the action was completed; and
• who escalates a missed or uncertain case.

 

Clear ownership is particularly important where sponsor reporting deadlines apply.

 

8. The employer assumes its immigration adviser is responsible

 

External immigration advisers can provide significant support, but the licensed organisation remains responsible for complying with its sponsor duties.

An adviser may:

 

• provide legal advice;
• assist with sponsor licence applications;
• advise on Certificates of Sponsorship;
• help assess reportable changes;
• support permitted SMS activity;
• conduct compliance audits;
• provide training; and
• assist with Home Office compliance matters.

 

However, an external adviser will generally only know about internal business events if the organisation tells them.

If a line manager changes a sponsored worker’s duties without informing HR, for example, an external adviser cannot assess or report an event they do not know has occurred.

The Authorising Officer should therefore ensure that the organisation retains effective internal ownership of sponsorship even where specialist support is outsourced.

 

9. Restructuring has blurred sponsorship responsibilities

 

Corporate and organisational change can undermine sponsorship arrangements that previously worked effectively.

Problems can arise following:

 

• mergers;
• acquisitions;
• TUPE transfers;
• internal restructuring;
• changes in ownership;
• changes to group structures;
• centralisation of HR;
• outsourcing;
• site closures; or
• changes to reporting lines.

 

The organisation should consider not only whether the change itself has sponsor licence implications, but whether the people and processes used to manage sponsorship remain appropriate afterwards.

 

10. The Authorising Officer is absent for an extended period

 

Temporary absence does not automatically require the Authorising Officer to be replaced.

However, an extended absence should prompt consideration of whether the individual can continue to provide the necessary senior oversight and whether they continue to satisfy the applicable requirements.

The sponsor should consider:

 

• how long the absence is expected to continue;
• whether the individual remains eligible;
• whether they remain based in the UK for the period in which they fill the role in accordance with the applicable requirements;
• who is overseeing sponsorship during the absence;
• whether Level 1 User coverage is adequate;
• how significant issues will be escalated; and
• whether a replacement Authorising Officer is required.

 

The assessment should reflect the actual circumstances rather than relying solely on the individual continuing to hold the same job title.

 

11. The organisation grows but its sponsorship system does not

 

A sponsorship system designed for a business employing three sponsored workers may become inadequate when the organisation employs 50 or 100.

Growth can increase:

 

• the number of Certificates of Sponsorship assigned;
• the number of recruitment decisions;
• the number of reportable events;
• the number of managers responsible for sponsored workers;
• the number of business locations;
• the volume of sponsorship records;
• the number of SMS users required; and
• the consequences of process failures.

 

The Authorising Officer should therefore ensure that governance arrangements remain proportionate as sponsorship activity expands.

This may require clearer written procedures, additional Level 1 Users, formal CoS approval processes, periodic reporting, internal audits or more structured escalation arrangements.

 

12. The organisation fixes errors but not the underlying system

 

A sponsor may respond quickly when an individual mistake is discovered but fail to address the reason the mistake occurred.

For example, correcting an overdue report may resolve the immediate issue, but it does not resolve the underlying problem if managers do not know when they need to tell HR about changes affecting sponsored workers.

Effective remediation should therefore consider:

 

• what happened;
• why it happened;
• whether the same problem could affect other workers;
• whether responsibilities were unclear;
• whether training was inadequate;
• whether the control process failed;
• what changes are required; and
• how the organisation will confirm that the changes have worked.

 

The Authorising Officer should have sufficient oversight to ensure that significant compliance failures result in systemic remediation where necessary, rather than repeated isolated corrections.

 

13. Warning signs of weak Authorising Officer governance

 

Statements such as the following can indicate that sponsorship arrangements need closer review:

 

• “Only one person knows how our sponsor licence works.”
• “Our immigration adviser deals with all of that.”
• “We do not know who currently has SMS access.”
• “The Authorising Officer does not really get involved.”
• “HR tells the SMS user when something changes, but there is no formal process.”
• “We have never reviewed the Certificates of Sponsorship that have been assigned.”
• “Nobody has checked our key personnel details for several years.”
• “Our policy says one thing, but we do it differently in practice.”
• “We usually find out about employee changes after they have happened.”
• “We would struggle to manage the licence if our main Level 1 User left tomorrow.”

 

None of these statements automatically establishes a breach of sponsor duties.

They are, however, indicators that the organisation should examine whether its sponsorship governance remains effective.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section M: Authorising Officer Governance for Different Types of Employer

 

 

There is no single governance model that every sponsor must use.

The appropriate structure will depend on factors such as the size of the organisation, the number of sponsored workers, the frequency of sponsorship activity, the number of business locations and the complexity of the employer’s operations.

The underlying objective remains the same: the Authorising Officer should have sufficient visibility, authority and control to provide effective senior oversight of the sponsor licence.

A proportionate approach is therefore important. A small employer sponsoring two workers does not necessarily need the same governance structure as a multinational organisation sponsoring hundreds of workers across multiple locations.

 

1. Small employers

 

In a smaller organisation, sponsorship responsibilities are often concentrated in one or two people.

The same individual may legitimately act as:

 

• Authorising Officer;
• Key Contact; and
• Level 1 User.

 

This can provide a simple and effective structure where sponsorship activity is limited.

The principal risk is dependency on one individual.

If that person becomes unavailable, leaves the organisation or becomes ineligible, the employer may simultaneously lose senior oversight, its Home Office contact and its principal SMS user.

Smaller sponsors should therefore consider:

 

• who could take over if the Authorising Officer leaves;
• whether another eligible Level 1 User would provide useful resilience;
• where sponsor licence records and procedures are maintained;
• whether another senior employee understands the basic sponsorship arrangements;
• how outstanding sponsorship matters would be identified during an absence; and
• how access to relevant Home Office correspondence would be maintained.

 

A simple sponsorship system can still be robust if responsibilities and continuity arrangements are clear.

 

2. Growing employers

 

Sponsorship governance can become vulnerable when an organisation grows quickly.

A founder, director or HR manager may initially manage almost every aspect of the sponsor licence personally. As recruitment increases, individual tasks may gradually be passed to other employees without a formal redesign of the compliance structure.

This can result in informal delegation where nobody has a complete picture of the sponsorship process.

Growing employers should consider introducing clearer arrangements for:

 

• allocation of responsibilities;
• Certificate of Sponsorship approval;
• SMS access;
• reporting sponsored-worker changes;
• manager escalation;
• record keeping;
• periodic compliance reviews;
• Authorising Officer assurance; and
• continuity if key employees leave.

 

The governance model should develop alongside the organisation rather than only being reconsidered after a compliance problem occurs.

 

3. Large employers

 

Large employers are more likely to operate a distributed sponsorship model.

The Authorising Officer may be a senior member of:

 

• HR;
• People;
• Recruitment;
• Global Mobility; or
• another senior function responsible for sponsored recruitment and compliance.

 

Operational sponsorship may then involve multiple Level 1 Users, specialist immigration personnel, recruitment teams, payroll, HR business partners, line managers and external advisers.

In this environment, effective Authorising Officer oversight is unlikely to depend on personal involvement in every case.

Instead, the organisation may use governance tools such as:

 

• periodic sponsorship compliance reports;
• formal Certificate of Sponsorship approval processes;
• exception reporting;
• sample file reviews;
• SMS-user reviews;
• internal compliance audits;
• external sponsor licence audits;
• compliance dashboards;
• documented escalation procedures;
• regular sponsorship governance meetings; and
• formal remediation tracking.

 

The objective is to provide the Authorising Officer with sufficient reliable information to exercise senior oversight without requiring them to personally administer individual sponsorship cases.

 

4. Employers with multiple sites

 

Multiple-site employers face a particular information-flow challenge.

Sponsor licence administration may be centralised, while important information about sponsored workers originates locally.

For example, a site manager may be the first person to know that a sponsored worker:

 

• has stopped attending work;
• has changed duties;
• has moved to another location;
• has changed working arrangements;
• is working different hours;
• has been promoted;
• has resigned; or
• is facing disciplinary or capability action that could affect their employment.

 

If the site manager does not understand that the information may have sponsorship implications, the central immigration team may never receive it.

The Authorising Officer should therefore ensure there is an effective connection between local management and the central sponsorship function.

This may require:

 

• manager training;
• clear escalation procedures;
• central reporting channels;
• defined HR responsibilities;
• periodic compliance reminders; and
• testing whether local practices correspond with central policies.

 

5. Corporate groups

 

Corporate groups can create additional complexity because commercial management structures do not necessarily correspond with sponsor licence structures.

The organisation holding the sponsor licence remains responsible for its own sponsor duties.

A central HR team, shared payroll system or group-wide Global Mobility function does not remove the need to understand which legal entity is the licensed sponsor and how responsibilities operate for that entity.

This can create issues where:

 

• employees work across several group companies;
• HR is centralised in a parent company;
• senior managers hold roles across multiple entities;
• workers transfer between group companies;
• businesses merge or are acquired;
• shared-service arrangements are introduced;
• ownership changes; or
• the corporate structure is reorganised.

 

A group-level HR Director should not automatically be assumed to be eligible to act as Authorising Officer for every licensed company in the group.

Eligibility and sponsorship responsibility need to be considered by reference to the relevant licensed entity and the applicable Home Office requirements.

The Authorising Officer should also ensure that group-wide processes do not obscure entity-level sponsor responsibilities.

 

6. Employers using external immigration advisers

 

External immigration advisers can form an important part of the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements.

Depending on the engagement, an adviser may:

 

• advise on sponsor licence eligibility;
• assist with Certificates of Sponsorship;
• advise on reportable changes;
• support permitted SMS activity;
• provide sponsor compliance training;
• conduct audits;
• advise on complex worker changes;
• assist with Home Office correspondence; and
• support the organisation during compliance action.

 

The employer nevertheless remains responsible for complying with its sponsor duties.

The Authorising Officer should understand how the adviser fits into the governance structure.

This should include clarity over:

 

• which tasks the adviser performs;
• which tasks remain with the employer;
• who instructs the adviser;
• how internal business changes are communicated to the adviser;
• who approves significant sponsorship decisions;
• who monitors deadlines;
• what SMS access the adviser has, where permitted;
• how urgent issues are escalated; and
• what happens if the adviser is unavailable.

 

External advice can strengthen sponsorship governance, but it should not create a situation where the organisation itself no longer understands how its sponsor licence is being managed.

 

7. Employers with decentralised HR or recruitment

 

Decentralised organisations can face the opposite problem to highly centralised sponsors.

Different business units may recruit independently, while immigration expertise sits in a central team.

The local team may understand the proposed job and candidate, while the central team understands sponsorship requirements.

Neither has all the information independently.

The Authorising Officer should ensure the process connects these functions before sponsorship decisions are made.

For example, the process may need to establish:

 

• who confirms the genuine recruitment need;
• who provides the job description;
• who confirms salary and working arrangements;
• who assesses sponsorship eligibility;
• who approves the use of a Certificate of Sponsorship;
• who assigns the CoS;
• who retains the supporting evidence; and
• who monitors subsequent changes to the worker’s role.

 

This helps prevent gaps between operational knowledge and immigration compliance expertise.

 

8. Scaling Authorising Officer governance to the organisation

 

The level of governance required should be proportionate to the organisation’s sponsorship risk and complexity.

Relevant factors can include:

 

• the number of sponsored workers;
• the frequency with which Certificates of Sponsorship are assigned;
• the number of Level 1 Users;
• the number of business locations;
• the complexity of sponsored roles;
• the volume of international recruitment;
• staff turnover within HR and recruitment;
• whether HR is centralised or decentralised;
• the use of external advisers;
• previous sponsorship compliance issues;
• the frequency of corporate change; and
• the organisation’s wider compliance environment.

 

A sponsor with limited activity may be able to demonstrate effective control through relatively simple processes.

A complex multinational employer may need substantially more formal governance.

The objective is not to create the maximum possible amount of compliance administration.

It is to ensure that the Authorising Officer can see what is happening, understand material risks and exercise effective senior oversight of the sponsor licence.

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section N: Authorising Officer Selection Decision Framework

 

 

Selecting an Authorising Officer should involve more than identifying the most senior person available or automatically appointing the head of HR.

The proposed individual must first satisfy the applicable Home Office eligibility requirements. Employers should then consider whether that person is practically capable of exercising effective oversight of the sponsor licence.

A useful framework is:

Authority → Eligibility → Knowledge → Capacity → Access → Control → Continuity

The first two elements focus particularly on whether the individual can properly hold the role. The remaining elements help employers assess whether the appointment is likely to work effectively in practice.

This is an employer governance framework rather than a separate Home Office eligibility test.

 

1. Authority

 

The starting point is whether the proposed Authorising Officer holds the appropriate level of senior responsibility.

Under the sponsor guidance, the Authorising Officer should be the most senior person in the organisation responsible for the recruitment of all sponsored workers and ensuring that the organisation complies with its sponsor duties.

If the organisation does not recruit sponsored workers, the Authorising Officer should be the most senior person responsible for the organisation’s activities as a licensed sponsor.

The employer should therefore consider:

 

• What is the individual’s position within the organisation?
• Are they sufficiently senior?
• Are they responsible for sponsored-worker recruitment?
• Do they have responsibility for sponsor compliance?
• Can they require HR, recruitment and management teams to follow sponsorship procedures?
• Can they challenge decisions that create immigration compliance risk?
• Can they require problems to be corrected?

 

Seniority should be considered in relation to the individual’s actual responsibilities rather than job title alone.

 

2. Eligibility

 

The proposed Authorising Officer must satisfy the relevant Home Office requirements applying to key personnel and to the Authorising Officer role specifically.

The employer should check matters including:

 

• whether the individual is a paid member of staff or office holder as required;
• their relationship with the licensed organisation;
• whether they are based in the UK for the period in which they will fill the role, subject to any applicable exception;
• whether they have a valid National Insurance number where required;
• their immigration status;
• relevant criminal history;
• relevant regulatory or compliance issues;
• previous involvement with sponsor licence holders where relevant;
• bankruptcy or director disqualification issues where relevant;
• whether any suitability concerns arise; and
• whether they satisfy the specific requirements of the Authorising Officer role.

 

Eligibility should be assessed against the current sponsor guidance rather than assumptions based on previous Home Office rules or historic practice.

Where the proposed Authorising Officer is themselves a sponsored worker, this does not automatically prevent appointment. The employer should assess whether the individual independently satisfies the applicable general key personnel and Authorising Officer requirements.

 

3. Knowledge

 

An Authorising Officer does not have to be an immigration lawyer or personally administer every sponsored-worker case.

They should, however, understand enough about the sponsor licence to exercise meaningful oversight.

The employer should consider whether the proposed Authorising Officer understands, or can be appropriately trained to understand:

 

• the organisation’s principal sponsor duties;
• how sponsored workers are recruited;
• how sponsorship eligibility is assessed;
• how Certificates of Sponsorship are approved and assigned;
• how the SMS is controlled;
• who has SMS access;
• how sponsored-worker changes are identified;
• how potential reporting requirements are escalated;
• how sponsorship records are maintained;
• how sponsored workers are monitored;
• how compliance problems are escalated; and
• when specialist immigration advice should be obtained.

 

A technically knowledgeable HR administrator may understand the SMS better than the Authorising Officer, but the Authorising Officer should understand the overall system sufficiently to oversee it.

 

4. Capacity

 

The proposed Authorising Officer should have sufficient capacity to perform the role effectively.

This does not mean that they must personally undertake routine sponsorship administration.

It does mean that they should have sufficient time and organisational support to exercise appropriate oversight.

Relevant considerations include:

 

• the number of sponsored workers;
• the volume of Certificates of Sponsorship assigned;
• the number of SMS users;
• the number of business locations;
• the complexity of the organisation;
• the frequency of international recruitment;
• the availability of HR or Global Mobility support;
• the availability of compliance reporting;
• the individual’s existing responsibilities; and
• whether they can respond when significant sponsorship issues arise.

 

A senior executive may appear appropriate on paper but be a weak practical appointment if their workload means sponsorship matters rarely receive attention.

 

5. Access

 

The Authorising Officer needs access to the information required to oversee sponsorship.

Depending on the organisation, relevant information may originate from:

 

• HR;
• recruitment;
• payroll;
• line managers;
• finance;
• Global Mobility;
• legal;
• company secretarial teams;
• senior management; and
• external immigration advisers.

 

The employer should consider whether information from these functions can reach the Authorising Officer or sponsorship team when necessary.

An Authorising Officer cannot provide effective oversight if material events remain invisible to them.

For example, a salary change processed by payroll, a change of duties agreed by a manager or a corporate restructuring approved by senior management may have sponsorship implications even though none of those events originates within the immigration function.

 

6. Control

 

Effective oversight requires more than receiving information.

The Authorising Officer should have sufficient organisational authority to act when sponsorship risks are identified.

The employer should consider whether the proposed Authorising Officer can:

 

• challenge questionable sponsorship decisions;
• require appropriate checks before a Certificate of Sponsorship is assigned;
• control who is permitted to use the SMS;
• require investigation of compliance failures;
• escalate serious issues to senior management;
• obtain specialist legal advice where required;
• require procedures to be changed;
• ensure corrective action is completed; and
• require remediation of systemic weaknesses.

 

An individual may have excellent technical knowledge but still be a weak Authorising Officer if they lack the authority to influence the organisation’s conduct.

 

7. Continuity

 

The final consideration is whether the appointment provides sufficient continuity.

No employer can guarantee that an employee will remain indefinitely, but foreseeable risks should be considered.

Relevant questions include:

 

• Is the individual likely to remain with the organisation?
• Is their role expected to change?
• Will they spend significant periods overseas?
• Who could replace them if necessary?
• Is there adequate Level 1 User coverage?
• Are sponsorship procedures documented?
• Could another person identify outstanding sponsorship actions?
• Are records accessible if the Authorising Officer becomes unavailable?
• Is there sufficient organisational knowledge beyond one individual?

 

Continuity is particularly important where the Authorising Officer also acts as the Key Contact and principal Level 1 User.

 

8. Authorising Officer selection framework

 

Test	Key Question	What the Employer Should Consider
Authority	Does the individual have the required senior responsibility?	Seniority, sponsored recruitment responsibility, sponsor compliance responsibility and ability to direct relevant teams.
Eligibility	Can the individual lawfully and properly hold the role?	Employment or office-holder status, UK presence, National Insurance number where required, immigration status, suitability, relevant history and other Home Office requirements.
Knowledge	Do they understand how sponsorship is managed?	Sponsor duties, CoS controls, SMS governance, reporting, records, worker monitoring and escalation.
Capacity	Can they devote sufficient attention to the role?	Workload, sponsorship volume, organisational complexity, support and ability to respond to compliance issues.
Access	Will relevant information reach them?	Links with HR, recruitment, payroll, managers, corporate functions and external advisers.
Control	Can they act when a problem is identified?	Authority to challenge, restrict access, investigate, escalate, obtain advice and require remediation.
Continuity	Can the organisation maintain effective oversight if circumstances change?	Succession planning, documented procedures, backup personnel, Level 1 coverage and accessibility of records.

 

9. Formal eligibility and practical suitability are different questions

 

Employers should distinguish between whether someone is formally eligible to act as Authorising Officer and whether they are the strongest practical appointment for the organisation.

An individual may satisfy the Home Office requirements but have:

 

• limited visibility of recruitment;
• insufficient time;
• poor access to relevant information;
• little understanding of sponsorship processes; or
• insufficient practical authority over the teams carrying out sponsorship activity.

 

These issues do not necessarily mean the individual is formally ineligible. They may, however, create weaknesses in the sponsor’s governance arrangements.

Conversely, an employee may have extensive immigration expertise but still be unable to act as Authorising Officer if they do not satisfy the applicable Home Office requirements for the role.

Both questions therefore need to be addressed.

 

10. Who makes the strongest Authorising Officer?

 

The strongest Authorising Officer is not necessarily the most senior person in the organisation, nor the employee with the greatest technical knowledge of immigration law.

The appropriate appointment is an individual who satisfies the Home Office requirements and occupies the required senior position while having sufficient authority, visibility, capacity and organisational control to oversee sponsorship effectively.

For many employers, the key question is therefore not simply:

“Who can we name as Authorising Officer?”

It is:

“Who is eligible to hold the role and best placed within our organisation to exercise the senior responsibility the role requires?”

 

 

Back to top

 

 

Section O: Authorising Officer FAQs

 

 

The following questions address common practical issues employers face when appointing and managing a sponsor licence Authorising Officer.

 

Does an Authorising Officer have to be British?

No. There is no general requirement for the Authorising Officer to be a British citizen.

The proposed Authorising Officer must instead satisfy the applicable Home Office requirements for key personnel and the specific requirements applying to the Authorising Officer role.

This includes considering their immigration status and whether they are based in the UK for the period in which they will fill the role, subject to any applicable exception.

 

Does the Authorising Officer need immigration experience?

The Home Office does not require the Authorising Officer to be an immigration lawyer or professional immigration adviser.

However, the individual should understand the organisation’s principal sponsor duties and how its sponsorship system operates sufficiently to exercise effective senior oversight.

Where necessary, the Authorising Officer can be supported by trained HR personnel, Level 1 Users and specialist immigration advisers.

 

Does the Authorising Officer have to be the CEO or Managing Director?

No.

The Authorising Officer should be the most senior person in the organisation responsible for the recruitment of all sponsored workers and ensuring compliance with sponsor duties.

Where the organisation does not recruit sponsored workers, the relevant person is the most senior person responsible for the organisation’s activities as a licensed sponsor.

Depending on the organisation, this could potentially be a senior HR, People, Recruitment or Global Mobility professional rather than the Chief Executive.

The employer should assess actual responsibilities rather than relying on job title alone.

 

Can a part-time employee be the Authorising Officer?

Part-time working does not, by itself, necessarily prevent an individual from acting as Authorising Officer.

The individual must still satisfy the applicable eligibility requirements and be the appropriate senior person for the role.

The employer should also consider whether their working arrangements allow them to exercise effective oversight of the sponsor licence, particularly where the organisation has substantial sponsorship activity.

 

Can a sponsored worker be the Authorising Officer?

Being a sponsored worker does not automatically prevent an individual from acting as Authorising Officer.

The employer should assess whether the individual independently satisfies all applicable general key personnel requirements and the specific eligibility requirements for the Authorising Officer role.

This should include consideration of their immigration status, relationship with the sponsor, position within the organisation, UK presence, seniority and suitability.

Employers should therefore avoid treating either sponsored status or immigration status alone as determining eligibility.

 

Does the Authorising Officer need a National Insurance number?

Key personnel are generally required to have a valid National Insurance number unless an applicable exception applies.

The employer should check the current sponsor guidance when appointing or replacing an Authorising Officer, particularly where the proposed individual does not yet have a National Insurance number.

 

Can a remote worker be the Authorising Officer?

Remote working does not necessarily prevent someone from acting as Authorising Officer.

The important distinction is between an individual who works remotely while remaining appropriately based in the UK and an individual whose circumstances mean they are based overseas.

The general key personnel requirement is that the individual must be based in the UK for the period in which they fill the role, subject to the relevant exceptions in the sponsor guidance.

The employer should also consider whether the individual’s working arrangements allow effective access to the people, information and systems needed to oversee sponsorship.

 

Can the Authorising Officer travel or work temporarily outside the UK?

Temporary overseas travel should not automatically be treated in the same way as being based overseas.

The relevant question is whether the individual’s circumstances remain consistent with the applicable requirement to be based in the UK for the period in which they fill the role.

Where overseas working becomes prolonged or the individual’s normal working arrangements materially change, the sponsor should review whether they remain eligible and practically able to perform the Authorising Officer role.

 

Can a sponsor have two Authorising Officers?

No. A sponsor can only have one Authorising Officer at any one time.

This differs from the Level 1 User role, where an organisation can have more than one eligible user.

Employers concerned about continuity should therefore consider succession planning and adequate Level 1 User coverage rather than attempting to appoint multiple Authorising Officers.

 

Does the Authorising Officer automatically have access to the SMS?

No.

Appointment as Authorising Officer does not automatically provide access to the Sponsor Management System.

If the Authorising Officer requires SMS access, they must also be appointed as a Level 1 User and satisfy the applicable requirements for that role.

 

Can the Authorising Officer also be a Level 1 User?

Yes.

The same person can hold more than one key personnel role where they satisfy the applicable requirements for each role.

It is common, particularly among smaller sponsors, for the Authorising Officer also to act as a Level 1 User.

This can simplify administration but can also create dependency on one individual, making succession and continuity planning particularly important.

 

Can the Authorising Officer be a Level 2 User?

The Level 2 User arrangements are being phased out.

From 9 September 2026, sponsors can no longer appoint any new Level 2 Users.

Existing Level 2 Users are subject to transitional arrangements and must either:

 

• be converted to Level 1 Users where they satisfy the applicable requirements; or
• have their accounts deactivated by 8 March 2027.

 

An Authorising Officer who requires SMS access should therefore be appointed as a Level 1 User, provided they satisfy the relevant eligibility requirements.

 

Can an external HR consultant be the Authorising Officer?

Ordinarily, no.

The Authorising Officer must generally be a paid member of staff or an office holder within the sponsor organisation.

An external consultant or contractor engaged for a specific purpose would not ordinarily satisfy the requirements for the role.

Limited exceptions can apply in particular circumstances, including certain administration or insolvency arrangements, so the current sponsor guidance should be checked where unusual circumstances arise.

 

Can an immigration solicitor be the Authorising Officer?

An external immigration solicitor or other external representative cannot ordinarily act as the sponsor’s Authorising Officer simply because they advise the organisation on immigration matters.

The sponsor needs its own eligible Authorising Officer who satisfies the Home Office requirements.

An immigration solicitor can nevertheless support the Authorising Officer by providing advice, training, audits, compliance support and assistance with Home Office processes.

 

What happens if the Authorising Officer resigns?

The employer should act promptly to identify an eligible replacement and complete the applicable Home Office key personnel process.

Employers should not assume that the general 20-working-day reporting rule applying to specified organisational changes governs replacement of the Authorising Officer. Current sponsor guidance specifically distinguishes replacement of the Authorising Officer and Key Contact from that general provision.

The sponsor must maintain an eligible Authorising Officer throughout the life of its licence, making continuity planning important where a departure is anticipated.

 

Can the Authorising Officer be changed?

Yes.

The Authorising Officer can be replaced during the life of the sponsor licence.

The proposed replacement must satisfy the applicable requirements, and the sponsor should follow the current SMS and Home Office procedure for changing key personnel.

A change of Authorising Officer is also a useful point at which to review wider sponsorship governance, including Level 1 User coverage, SMS access, outstanding compliance issues and succession arrangements.

 

Is the Authorising Officer personally responsible for every sponsor licence mistake?

No. The licensed sponsor organisation remains responsible for complying with its sponsor duties.

The Authorising Officer has senior responsibility for the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements and the activities of its SMS users, but this does not mean that they must personally perform every immigration or sponsorship task.

Operational responsibilities can be allocated to HR personnel, Level 1 Users and other appropriate employees, with external advisers providing specialist support where required.

The important issue is that delegation operates within an effective system of oversight, control and escalation.

The Authorising Officer should therefore be neither expected to perform every sponsorship task personally nor treated as a nominal appointment with no meaningful involvement in sponsorship governance.

 

Back to top

 

 

Section P: How DavidsonMorris Can Help

 

 

The Authorising Officer is central to the governance of a sponsor licence. Problems with eligibility, succession, SMS oversight or internal reporting can expose the organisation to wider sponsor compliance risk.

DavidsonMorris advises employers on the appointment and management of Authorising Officers and other sponsor licence key personnel, as well as the wider systems required to maintain effective sponsorship compliance.

Support can range from advice on an individual appointment or change of Authorising Officer through to comprehensive sponsor licence audits, governance reviews, training and assistance with Home Office compliance action.

 

1. Authorising Officer eligibility and appointment

 

We can advise employers on whether a proposed Authorising Officer meets the relevant Home Office requirements and is appropriate for the organisation’s sponsorship structure.

This can include consideration of:

 

• the individual’s position and seniority;
• responsibility for sponsored-worker recruitment;
• responsibility for sponsor compliance;
• employment or office-holder status;
• UK presence requirements;
• immigration status;
• National Insurance number requirements;
• relevant suitability considerations;
• previous involvement with sponsor licence holders;
• corporate group arrangements;
• overseas working arrangements;
• appointments involving sponsored workers;
• whether the same individual can hold multiple key personnel roles; and
• whether the Authorising Officer should also be appointed as a Level 1 User.

 

This can be particularly important where the proposed appointment does not fit a straightforward senior HR structure.

 

2. Changing your Authorising Officer

 

We can advise where an existing Authorising Officer is leaving, changing role, becoming unavailable or is no longer appropriate for the position.

Support can include:

 

• assessing the proposed replacement;
• advising on eligibility requirements;
• advising on the applicable Home Office process;
• assisting with supporting documentation;
• advising on SMS procedures;
• reviewing Level 1 User coverage;
• reviewing other key personnel arrangements;
• identifying outstanding sponsorship actions;
• assessing continuity risks; and
• considering whether the change gives rise to any wider sponsor reporting or corporate change issues.

 

Where the departure is unexpected, early action can be important to protect continuity of the organisation’s sponsor licence arrangements.

 

3. Authorising Officer training

 

An Authorising Officer does not need to become an immigration lawyer, but they should understand the sponsor licence sufficiently to exercise effective senior oversight.

DavidsonMorris can provide tailored training covering areas such as:

 

• the Authorising Officer role;
• key personnel responsibilities;
• principal sponsor duties;
• SMS governance;
• Level 1 User responsibilities;
• Certificate of Sponsorship controls;
• sponsor reporting duties;
• record-keeping requirements;
• sponsored-worker monitoring;
• internal escalation arrangements;
• responding to compliance problems;
• Home Office compliance visits; and
• when specialist advice should be obtained.

 

Training can also be extended to HR personnel, recruitment teams, line managers and other employees whose actions or decisions feed into the sponsorship compliance process.

 

4. Sponsor licence governance reviews

 

For employers with established sponsor licences, we can review whether the organisation’s governance arrangements remain appropriate for its current sponsorship activity.

A governance review can consider:

 

• allocation of sponsorship responsibilities;
• Authorising Officer oversight;
• key personnel eligibility;
• Level 1 User coverage;
• SMS access controls;
• Certificate of Sponsorship approval processes;
• sponsor reporting procedures;
• record keeping;
• sponsored-worker monitoring;
• manager-to-HR escalation processes;
• the use of external immigration advisers;
• continuity arrangements;
• succession planning; and
• areas of potential compliance exposure.

 

This can be particularly valuable where the organisation has grown significantly since obtaining its sponsor licence or where its HR and recruitment structures have changed.

 

5. Sponsor licence compliance audits

 

A sponsor licence compliance audit provides a more detailed assessment of the organisation’s records, systems and actual working practices.

Audits can be useful following:

 

• rapid growth in sponsored-worker numbers;
• changes to the HR or immigration team;
• departure of key personnel;
• corporate restructuring;
• mergers or acquisitions;
• suspected reporting failures;
• record-keeping problems;
• changes to sponsorship processes;
• significant SMS errors; or
• concerns about readiness for Home Office scrutiny.

 

The audit can examine both individual compliance issues and the underlying systems responsible for preventing, identifying and correcting sponsorship failures.

 

6. Preparing for a Home Office compliance visit

 

Where an employer is expecting a Home Office compliance visit, preparation should extend beyond assembling documents.

DavidsonMorris can assist with reviewing:

 

• sponsorship records;
• sponsored-worker files;
• SMS information;
• key personnel arrangements;
• Certificate of Sponsorship processes;
• reporting procedures;
• right to work processes;
• internal policies;
• actual working practices;
• identified compliance weaknesses; and
• remedial action already taken or required.

 

We can also help the Authorising Officer and other relevant personnel understand the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements and prepare to explain how compliance responsibilities operate in practice.

The objective is not to provide scripted answers. It is to identify weaknesses before the visit and ensure that relevant personnel understand the systems for which they are responsible.

 

7. Responding to sponsor compliance problems

 

Where a compliance issue has already occurred, employers should consider both the immediate problem and its underlying cause.

We can advise on issues involving:

 

• missed sponsor reports;
• incorrect Certificates of Sponsorship;
• key personnel failures;
• inappropriate or unexplained SMS activity;
• record-keeping deficiencies;
• right to work and illegal working concerns;
• Home Office investigations;
• compliance visit findings;
• sponsor licence downgrading;
• sponsor licence suspension; and
• potential sponsor licence revocation.

 

Depending on the circumstances, this may involve correcting the immediate issue, assessing whether additional Home Office action is required and implementing remediation to address the underlying governance weakness.

 

8. Addressing the issue and the underlying cause

 

Effective sponsor compliance advice should not stop once an individual error has been corrected.

Where appropriate, DavidsonMorris can help employers establish:

 

• what happened;
• why it happened;
• whether other sponsored workers may be affected;
• whether a reporting or record-keeping failure occurred;
• whether the issue indicates a wider control weakness;
• what immediate corrective action is required;
• what longer-term remediation should be implemented; and
• how the revised process should subsequently be tested.

 

This approach allows the employer to address both the individual compliance incident and the organisational weakness that caused or contributed to it.

For Authorising Officers, this can provide greater assurance that identified problems have been properly resolved rather than simply corrected on a case-by-case basis.

 

Back to top

 

 

Section Q: Authorising Officer Glossary

 

The following terms are commonly used when managing an Authorising Officer and the wider sponsor licence compliance framework.

 

Term	Meaning
Authorising Officer	The Authorising Officer is the senior person appointed by the sponsor with responsibility for the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements. Under the sponsor guidance, the Authorising Officer should be the most senior person responsible for the recruitment of all sponsored workers and ensuring that the organisation complies with its sponsor duties. If the organisation does not recruit sponsored workers, the Authorising Officer should be the most senior person responsible for its activities as a licensed sponsor. A sponsor can only have one Authorising Officer at any one time.
Key Personnel	Key Personnel are the individuals appointed to specified sponsor licence management roles. The principal roles are:   Authorising Officer; Key Contact; and Level 1 User.   These roles can be held by different people or, where the applicable eligibility requirements are satisfied, the same individual can perform more than one role. The sponsor must maintain an eligible Authorising Officer and at least one eligible Level 1 User throughout the life of the sponsor licence.
Key Contact	The Key Contact acts as the principal point of contact between the sponsor and UK Visas and Immigration in relation to the sponsor licence. The Key Contact role is different from the Authorising Officer role, although the same eligible person can hold both positions. A sponsor can only have one Key Contact at any one time.
Level 1 User	A Level 1 User is an individual with access to the Sponsor Management System and the permissions associated with that role. Level 1 Users can carry out key sponsor licence administration through the SMS, subject to the applicable Home Office rules and system permissions. The Authorising Officer does not automatically receive SMS access. If the Authorising Officer needs to use the SMS, they must also be appointed as an eligible Level 1 User. A sponsor can have more than one Level 1 User.
Level 2 User	A Level 2 User is a legacy SMS user category that is now being phased out. From 9 September 2026, sponsors can no longer appoint any new Level 2 Users. Existing Level 2 Users can continue temporarily under the transitional arrangements, but they must either:   be converted to Level 1 Users where they meet the applicable eligibility requirements; or have their accounts deactivated by 8 March 2027.   Employers with existing Level 2 Users should therefore review those accounts and their wider SMS access arrangements before the transitional deadline.
Sponsor Management System (SMS)	The Sponsor Management System, usually referred to as the SMS, is the Home Office online system used by licensed sponsors to manage specified aspects of their sponsor licence. Depending on the action and the user’s permissions, the SMS is used for functions such as:   managing sponsor licence information; managing key personnel and users; requesting and assigning Certificates of Sponsorship; reporting specified worker changes; reporting relevant organisational changes; and carrying out other sponsor licence administration.   SMS access should be restricted to appropriate and eligible users and should remain subject to effective sponsor oversight.
Certificate of Sponsorship (CoS)	A Certificate of Sponsorship, or CoS, is an electronic sponsorship record assigned by a licensed sponsor to an eligible worker for a relevant sponsored work route. It is not a physical certificate. The CoS contains information about the worker, their proposed employment and the sponsorship being provided. Because the information recorded on a CoS can be central to the worker’s immigration application and the sponsor’s compliance position, employers should have appropriate controls over how Certificates are requested, approved and assigned. Current Home Office guidance recommends that the Authorising Officer checks Certificates of Sponsorship assigned to workers at least once a month.
Sponsor Duties	Sponsor duties are the continuing obligations imposed on organisations holding a sponsor licence. They include responsibilities relating to areas such as:   record keeping; reporting specified changes; monitoring sponsored workers; maintaining appropriate sponsorship systems; cooperating with the Home Office; maintaining suitable key personnel; and preventing abuse of the immigration system.   The licensed organisation remains responsible for compliance with its sponsor duties. The Authorising Officer provides senior oversight of the organisation’s sponsorship arrangements, but this should not be confused with every sponsor duty being imposed personally on the Authorising Officer.
Sponsor Reporting Duties	Sponsor reporting duties require licensed sponsors to notify the Home Office of specified changes affecting sponsored workers or the sponsor organisation. Different reporting requirements and procedures can apply depending on the type of change. Employers should therefore avoid assuming that every sponsor change is governed by the same reporting deadline or SMS procedure. In particular, the current sponsor guidance distinguishes replacement of the Authorising Officer or Key Contact from the general 20-working-day reporting requirement applying to specified organisational changes.
Sponsor Compliance	Sponsor compliance refers to the systems, processes and conduct through which an organisation meets the requirements associated with holding a sponsor licence. Effective sponsor compliance can involve:   appropriate recruitment processes; accurate CoS assignment; worker monitoring; timely reporting; record keeping; SMS controls; appropriate key personnel; right to work compliance; internal escalation; and effective governance and remediation.   Sponsor compliance is a continuing organisational responsibility rather than a one-off exercise completed when the licence is granted.
Home Office Compliance Visit	A Home Office compliance visit is a compliance activity through which the Home Office can assess whether an organisation meets, and continues to meet, the requirements associated with sponsorship. Compliance activity can examine documentation, systems and actual working practices. The Home Office may speak to relevant personnel and may examine whether the organisation understands and effectively operates its sponsorship arrangements. The Authorising Officer may therefore be important during compliance activity, although they should not be assumed to be interviewed in every case.
Sponsorship Governance	Sponsorship governance describes the organisational framework through which sponsor licence responsibilities are allocated, controlled, reviewed and escalated. It can include:   allocation of responsibilities; Authorising Officer oversight; SMS access controls; CoS approval processes; reporting procedures; record-keeping arrangements; internal assurance; compliance audits; training; escalation arrangements; succession planning; and remediation.   The term is useful for distinguishing the wider system of organisational control from individual administrative sponsorship tasks.
Remediation	Remediation is the process of addressing the underlying cause of a sponsor compliance failure rather than only correcting the immediate error. For example, if a required sponsor report is missed: Correction may involve determining what Home Office action is now required and addressing the outstanding issue. Remediation involves establishing why the reporting failure occurred and improving the process to reduce the risk of it happening again. This could involve:   clarifying responsibilities; changing internal procedures; training managers or HR personnel; introducing additional checks; reviewing other sponsored-worker cases for similar failures; and testing whether the revised process operates effectively.   This distinction is important for Authorising Officers because effective senior oversight should consider both the individual error and the governance weakness that allowed it to occur.

 

Back to top

 

 

Section R: Primary Legal & Home Office Sources

 

 

The Authorising Officer requirements form part of the wider Home Office sponsor licence framework. Employers should use the current version of the relevant sponsor guidance when appointing an Authorising Officer, changing key personnel or reviewing their sponsorship arrangements.

Sponsor guidance and Sponsor Management System procedures are updated periodically. Historic internal procedures, previous versions of guidance or established organisational practice should therefore not be assumed to reflect the current requirements.

 

1. Workers and Temporary Workers: Guidance for Sponsors – Part 1

 

The principal Home Office source for the Authorising Officer role is Workers and Temporary Workers: Guidance for Sponsors – Part 1: Apply for a licence.

Section L4 of the guidance addresses sponsor licence key personnel and contains the principal requirements relevant to the Authorising Officer.

These include provisions dealing with:

 

• the mandatory key personnel roles;
• general eligibility requirements for key personnel;
• who can and cannot undertake key personnel roles;
• the requirement to nominate an eligible Authorising Officer;
• the Authorising Officer’s position within the organisation;
• the required level of senior responsibility;
• the number of Authorising Officers permitted;
• responsibility for deciding how many people should have SMS access;
• responsibility for the activities of SMS users;
• the relationship between the Authorising Officer role and SMS access;
• the ability of one eligible person to perform multiple key personnel roles;
• monitoring SMS-user activity;
• the Home Office recommendation that the Authorising Officer checks Certificates of Sponsorship assigned to workers at least monthly; and
• the continuing requirement to maintain an eligible Authorising Officer.

 

The guidance should be checked directly when assessing eligibility because the precise requirements can depend on the individual’s circumstances and the sponsorship route involved.

 

2. Workers and Temporary Workers: Guidance for Sponsors – Part 3

 

Workers and Temporary Workers: Guidance for Sponsors – Part 3: Sponsor duties and compliance is particularly relevant once the organisation holds its sponsor licence.

Part 3 addresses continuing sponsor duties and the management of changes affecting the sponsor organisation and its sponsored workers.

Relevant areas include:

 

• changes to sponsor circumstances;
• changes to key personnel;
• replacing the Authorising Officer;
• replacing the Key Contact;
• adding or changing Level 1 Users;
• organisational changes;
• sponsor reporting requirements;
• record keeping;
• compliance responsibilities;
• Home Office compliance activity; and
• potential action where sponsor duties are not met.

 

Employers changing their Authorising Officer should pay particular attention to the specific key personnel provisions rather than assuming that the general reporting rule applying to specified organisational changes governs the replacement.

Current guidance distinguishes replacement of the Authorising Officer and Key Contact from that general 20-working-day provision.

 

3. GOV.UK Sponsorship Management Roles

 

The GOV.UK guidance on sponsorship management roles provides an employer-facing overview of the principal roles used to manage a sponsor licence.

It explains the functions of the:

 

• Authorising Officer;
• Key Contact;
• Level 1 User; and
• relevant transitional Level 2 User arrangements.

 

The guidance describes the Authorising Officer as a senior and competent person responsible for the actions of staff and representatives who use the Sponsor Management System.

It also explains that the sponsorship management roles can be undertaken by the same person or by different people, provided the applicable requirements are met.

The GOV.UK overview is useful for understanding the basic structure, while the detailed sponsor guidance should be used for the full eligibility and compliance requirements.

 

4. Sponsor Management System guidance and manuals

 

The Home Office also publishes guidance and manuals dealing with operation of the Sponsor Management System.

These materials are particularly important when the sponsor needs to carry out a specific administrative action.

Depending on the circumstances, SMS guidance can explain the process for matters such as:

 

• changing key personnel;
• adding or changing SMS users;
• updating sponsor details;
• reporting organisational changes;
• requesting Certificates of Sponsorship;
• assigning Certificates of Sponsorship;
• reporting sponsored-worker changes; and
• managing other sponsor information.

 

Employers should distinguish between the sponsor guidance, which explains the relevant compliance requirements, and the SMS manuals, which commonly provide the procedural instructions for completing an action through the system.

In practical terms:

The sponsor guidance explains what the sponsor is required to do.

The SMS guidance helps explain how the relevant system action is carried out.

Both may therefore need to be considered when changing an Authorising Officer or managing another key personnel issue.

 

5. Check the current guidance when circumstances change

 

Sponsor licence rules and administrative processes can change.

Employers should therefore check the current Home Office material when:

 

• appointing an Authorising Officer;
• replacing an Authorising Officer;
• appointing or changing other key personnel;
• changing SMS access;
• dealing with existing Level 2 Users;
• restructuring the organisation;
• changing ownership;
• transferring employees between entities;
• reporting significant organisational changes;
• responding to a sponsorship compliance problem; or
• preparing for Home Office compliance activity.

 

This is particularly important where an organisation has held a sponsor licence for several years and its internal procedures were designed around earlier versions of the sponsorship system.

 

6. Current guidance should take priority over historic internal procedures

 

An employer may have followed the same sponsorship procedure for many years without previously encountering a problem.

That does not necessarily mean the procedure remains compliant.

Changes to Home Office guidance can affect:

 

• key personnel requirements;
• SMS-user arrangements;
• reporting processes;
• document requirements;
• Certificate of Sponsorship procedures;
• compliance expectations; and
• the administrative steps required through the SMS.

 

The 2026 changes to Level 2 Users provide a clear example. A sponsor may historically have relied on Level 2 Users as part of its SMS structure, but from 9 September 2026 no new Level 2 Users can be appointed and existing Level 2 Users must either be converted to Level 1 Users, where eligible, or have their accounts deactivated by 8 March 2027.

Authorising Officers should therefore ensure that sponsorship procedures are reviewed when the Home Office changes the applicable rules or system arrangements.

The organisation’s compliance position should be determined by the current Home Office requirements, not simply by what the organisation has done historically.

 

Back to top

 

 

Section S: Useful Links & Related Sponsor Licence Guides

 

 

Resource	URL
Workers and Temporary Workers: Guidance for Sponsors – Part 1 Part 1 – detailed Home Office guidance covering sponsor licence applications, key personnel eligibility and the Authorising Officer requirements.	https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/workers-and-temporary-workers-guidance-for-sponsors-part-1-apply-for-a-licence
Workers and Temporary Workers: Guidance for Sponsors – Part 3 Part 3 – Home Office guidance covering sponsor duties, compliance, organisational changes and changes to key personnel.	https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/workers-and-temporary-workers-guidance-for-sponsors-part-3-sponsor-duties-and-compliance
UK Visa Sponsorship for Employers: Sponsorship Management Roles GOV.UK overview of the Authorising Officer, Key Contact and SMS user roles.	https://www.gov.uk/uk-visa-sponsorship-employers/sponsorship-management-roles
Sponsor Management System Guidance and Manuals procedural guidance for sponsors using the SMS to manage their licence, key personnel, Certificates of Sponsorship and reportable changes.	https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/use-the-sponsorship-management-system-sms-user-manual
UK Visa Sponsorship for Employers GOV.UK guidance for employers sponsoring workers under the UK immigration system.	https://www.gov.uk/uk-visa-sponsorship-employers

 

 

Back to top